The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 13 August 2014, 01:37 AM   #1
Mick P
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
Jubilee Bracelt Stretch

Chaps

I am being pressed to make a quick decision on whether to make a purchase of a 1968 GMT 1675.

It comes with a Jubilee bracelet and hopefully the pic will come out below.

Simple question - is the level of stretch acceptable ?

Regards

Mick

Name:  image001.jpg
Views: 360
Size:  52.4 KB
Mick P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 01:59 AM   #2
inLine4
"TRF" Member
 
inLine4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: KC
Location: GMT-5
Watch: GSAR
Posts: 2,104
Looks fine to me.
__________________
"Be Real, Buy Real."
inLine4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 07:53 AM   #3
KBM
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by inLine4 View Post
Looks fine to me.
What he said!
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 02:05 AM   #4
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,216
Works for me too. Wear it on the snug side, perform a regular cleaning regimen, and it will look that way for years.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 02:14 AM   #5
erikw
"TRF" Member
 
erikw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Erik
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 33
Looks good to me.
erikw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 02:19 AM   #6
Time Exposure
"TRF" Member
 
Time Exposure's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Sac Valley, CA US
Watch: Patek 5980/1A
Posts: 2,860
Absolutely acceptable. In fact it looks so good I wonder if it's original to the watch?
Time Exposure is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 02:43 AM   #7
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
For a 1968 watch it's splendid.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 02:50 AM   #8
MortgageGuy
"TRF" Member
 
MortgageGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
Looks great, a lot of life left in that bracelet
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki
MortgageGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 02:52 AM   #9
rmfnla
"TRF" Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Richard
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: TT DJ
Posts: 4,456
Jubilee band is much more flexible than the Oyster, which is why it is so comfortable.

As the others have said, that band looks fine...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Lug Hole Lover®
rmfnla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 02:55 AM   #10
cop414
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
cop414's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,244
I've seen much much worse, love the GMT on the jubilee!
__________________

Rolex Submariner 14060M
Omega Seamaster 2254.50
DOXA Professional 1200T

Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron
P Club Member #17
2 FA ENABLED
cop414 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 03:01 AM   #11
1995akcoop
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,162
that old yes, and if it wasnt that old, still yes


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
1995akcoop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 03:31 AM   #12
bp1000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,975
I've seen a 2004 watch with about the same amount of stretch. I classed that as bad but for the age of your watch this is very surprising. Especially as I think this is an oval link jubilee which is prone to more stretch.

This will wear fine on the wrist providing you can get it to fit it quite snug.

I wouldn't buy without a rehaul on anything worse because it tends to sit a bit sideways on the wrist.
bp1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 07:45 AM   #13
rmfnla
"TRF" Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Richard
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: TT DJ
Posts: 4,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by bp1000 View Post
I've seen a 2004 watch with about the same amount of stretch. I classed that as bad but for the age of your watch this is very surprising. Especially as I think this is an oval link jubilee which is prone to more stretch.
This will wear fine on the wrist providing you can get it to fit it quite snug.

I wouldn't buy without a rehaul on anything worse because it tends to sit a bit sideways on the wrist.
Actually, the photo looks more like a D link, at least to me...
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Lug Hole Lover®
rmfnla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 09:24 AM   #14
bp1000
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,975
Quote:
Originally Posted by rmfnla View Post
Actually, the photo looks more like a D link, at least to me...
Ah then that explains why for its age there is such little (relative to age) stretch.

Rolex don't make oval link jubilee bracelets anymore, it does indeed look like it has the slightly more peaked D links so it must have had a bracelet swap at some point.
bp1000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 August 2014, 06:04 AM   #15
rmfnla
"TRF" Member
 
rmfnla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Richard
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: TT DJ
Posts: 4,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by bp1000 View Post
Ah then that explains why for its age there is such little (relative to age) stretch.

Rolex don't make oval link jubilee bracelets anymore, it does indeed look like it has the slightly more peaked D links so it must have had a bracelet swap at some point.
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here...
Lug Hole Lover®
rmfnla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 03:42 AM   #16
Rolexpharm
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Bensalem, Pa
Posts: 638
Yes that is fine. That is less than most
Rolexpharm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 03:44 AM   #17
Chaching
"TRF" Member
 
Chaching's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: None of ya #@!
Location: Somewhere
Watch: Many! 116718 GOLD
Posts: 2,137
not bad at all
Chaching is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 04:17 AM   #18
Rolex1603
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 75
Also if you don't like the stretch then u can send it to Michael Young. I just got mine back today. Here is a pic of the before and after
Attached Images
 
Rolex1603 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 08:50 AM   #19
Vishy26
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Krishna
Location: Australia
Posts: 611
This is acceptable stretch I think.
Vishy26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 08:52 AM   #20
mjclark32
"TRF" Member
 
mjclark32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: MJC
Location: PHL USA
Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP
Posts: 29,232
Looks OK
__________________
mjclark32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 09:36 AM   #21
THC
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
THC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 126333
Posts: 10,666
As far as a jubilee band goes, yours is in great shape. I would grade it at 80% which is awesome...
THC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 10:14 AM   #22
azguy
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
That ain't bad....
azguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 10:28 AM   #23
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
it is fine imho and it is indeed d link
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 10:31 AM   #24
14060m
"TRF" Member
 
14060m's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Watch: 116610 , 16233
Posts: 1,802
Looks great
__________________
14060m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 August 2014, 11:20 AM   #25
CCI24
"TRF" Member
 
CCI24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: colin
Location: Maryland
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 287
Works well for me
CCI24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 August 2014, 12:17 PM   #26
broulstone
"TRF" Member
 
broulstone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Bruce
Location: Alexandria, VA
Watch: EXP II, DJ,PP5066
Posts: 1,597
Not bad and for a couple $100 you can have Michael Young make it like new
__________________
Bruce, 16570 Explorer II, DJ 16234 DJ 16013, 6466, 1947 Rolex Oyster, JLC Grande Reverso 976, PP 5066, Ellipse, Omega Seamaster
broulstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 August 2014, 12:19 PM   #27
T. Ferguson
"TRF" Member
 
T. Ferguson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
That bracelet has barely hit puberty.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints.
T. Ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.