ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 September 2014, 04:52 AM | #1 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: Aaron
Location: Calgary AB
Watch: Explorer II 42
Posts: 15
|
LV the real deal...?
Looking at a 16610LV and not being a Sub guy wanted to find out the obvious tells to authenticity, or not as the case may be. I came across a seemingly well written article but since that too came from the net I'd like to get some independant verification of it as well. Here is the key snippet from it I am questioning.
Quote:
I'd really like some positive yay or nay on this if possible. I'll add a few photos of the watch in question in a moment. The other issue on it I see is the brushing on the lugs. It could just be the lighting, but it looks poorly done and 'heavier' that typical of Rolex, and certainly WAY heavier than that of my Explorer II or even my Tudors. Quick edit: that snippet is from an ebay guide to spotting fake Subs on their site. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.