ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Mr DateJust · 7 November 2014, 07:42 PM

Considering the 116622 YM blue dial as my next watch. Not had a chance to see one at an AD yet as none in my area have one at the moment. Can anyone comment on how it is for size. I am not a big watch person and am used to my DateJust. I also find the 40mm explorer II fine for size. On the too big side is the new 42mm explorer II and also the Sub C I find to be pushing it due to its bulk. The GMT2-C is about on the threshold for me. Obviously it's best I go and check it out in person but wondered if anyone with the YM could give some input.

Thanks.

viper9669 · 7 November 2014, 08:19 PM

It wears a bit on the smaller side for me because of the case design, imo. My wrist is 7.5".
Go for it!👍

toneafficianado · 7 November 2014, 08:46 PM

I have tried one out against a DJII also blue. Compared for half an hour.It looks smaller and feels lighter than DJII for sure and what a glamour piece it is! I say "Go For It". It'll be more like 40mm Exp II

Racerdj · 7 November 2014, 08:50 PM

Stunning picture Patrick! It is a stunning piece! Good luck

zama · 7 November 2014, 09:34 PM

Cracking choice, i like it a lot

brandrea · 7 November 2014, 09:48 PM

I like it!

Ken B · 7 November 2014, 10:00 PM

Thanks for that image Patrick. I also have a 7.5" wrist and have been looking at that piece. I just can't get over the looks of it.
Funny thing, the watch is basically a submariner but it looks so much better. IMHO..
Mr. DJ I say go for it!

Mr DateJust · 7 November 2014, 11:56 PM

Thanks. I guessed due to the more tapered/rounded case it would wear similar to the 40mm explorer II. Just need to find one locally to try on. When making a deal on it should I be aiming for discount similar to a two tone model as technically the 116622 is part precious metal and part steel or should I be looking at it as a steel sports? I also don't suspect they are Rolex biggest seller.

ltmgeller · 8 November 2014, 12:10 AM

Go for it. It should be similar in size to the gmt II c. Happy hunting.

Camel · 8 November 2014, 12:30 AM

Mine, on my 9¼ inch wrist - added two more links to standard Oyster bracelet after photo was taken.

AK797 · 8 November 2014, 12:42 AM

Similar to subc.

Nycturbovr6 · 8 November 2014, 01:23 AM

I like that watch a lot.

afc1 · 8 November 2014, 01:26 AM

I find it wears similar to a non-ceramic Submariner Date.

acr · 8 November 2014, 01:30 AM

Most comfortable Rolex I've ever worn!!!

Rolex-RC · 8 November 2014, 02:38 AM

Now I want to switch to the blue face!

tkerrmd · 8 November 2014, 02:54 AM

here it is with my GMT and sub...

my son...

watchwatcher · 8 November 2014, 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr DateJust

Thanks. I guessed due to the more tapered/rounded case it would wear similar to the 40mm explorer II. Just need to find one locally to try on. When making a deal on it should I be aiming for discount similar to a two tone model as technically the 116622 is part precious metal and part steel or should I be looking at it as a steel sports? I also don't suspect they are Rolex biggest seller.

I would bet your best discounts would be right here in the classifieds...seen some pretty good deals lately.

vitalsignsrn · 8 November 2014, 05:16 AM

I've tried both DJ II & this YM. I found the YM wore smaller & was more comfortable. It felt the same as my Sub 14060. :-)

Mr DateJust · 8 November 2014, 06:23 AM

Great pics Tom. It does look slightly less bulky than the SubC and the GMT2C. Think I need to try and see one in the metal and try it on next to my 116200 and 16570. Also need to see what sort of deal I can swing.

7 November 2014, 07:42 PM	#1
Mr DateJust "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Glasgow, UK Watch: 16570 Posts: 909	116622 blue. How is it for size. Considering the 116622 YM blue dial as my next watch. Not had a chance to see one at an AD yet as none in my area have one at the moment. Can anyone comment on how it is for size. I am not a big watch person and am used to my DateJust. I also find the 40mm explorer II fine for size. On the too big side is the new 42mm explorer II and also the Sub C I find to be pushing it due to its bulk. The GMT2-C is about on the threshold for me. Obviously it's best I go and check it out in person but wondered if anyone with the YM could give some input. Thanks.

7 November 2014, 08:19 PM	#2
viper9669 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Real Name: Patrick Location: SIN Watch: Rolex Posts: 5,066	116622 blue. How is it for size. It wears a bit on the smaller side for me because of the case design, imo. My wrist is 7.5". Go for it!👍

7 November 2014, 08:50 PM	#4
Racerdj 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Indianapolis Watch: Patek-Philippe Posts: 16,832	Stunning picture Patrick! It is a stunning piece! Good luck __________________ Rolex and Patek Philippe

7 November 2014, 09:34 PM	#5
zama "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Craig Location: Sydney Watch: 4 Broken glass Posts: 5,808	Cracking choice, i like it a lot __________________ Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed..... Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze

7 November 2014, 10:00 PM	#7
Ken B "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Location: Phoenix, AZ USA Watch: To many to count Posts: 766	Thanks for that image Patrick. I also have a 7.5" wrist and have been looking at that piece. I just can't get over the looks of it. Funny thing, the watch is basically a submariner but it looks so much better. IMHO.. Mr. DJ I say go for it! __________________ Omega Planet Ocean 600m Chrono 45.5mm Tudor Heritage Chrono (blue) 42mm Breitling Chronomat GMT 44mm Tudor Black Bay Bronze 43mm KRB Imaging and Photography

7 November 2014, 08:46 PM	#3
toneafficianado 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Alan Location: Australia Posts: 2,204	I have tried one out against a DJII also blue. Compared for half an hour.It looks smaller and feels lighter than DJII for sure and what a glamour piece it is! I say "Go For It". It'll be more like 40mm Exp II

7 November 2014, 09:48 PM	#6
brandrea 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Brian (TBone) Location: canada Watch: es make me smile Posts: 78,129	I like it!

7 November 2014, 11:56 PM	#8
Mr DateJust "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Glasgow, UK Watch: 16570 Posts: 909	Thanks. I guessed due to the more tapered/rounded case it would wear similar to the 40mm explorer II. Just need to find one locally to try on. When making a deal on it should I be aiming for discount similar to a two tone model as technically the 116622 is part precious metal and part steel or should I be looking at it as a steel sports? I also don't suspect they are Rolex biggest seller.

8 November 2014, 12:10 AM	#9
ltmgeller 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Real Name: Mike Location: New York Watch: Rolex Posts: 22,585	Go for it. It should be similar in size to the gmt II c. Happy hunting.

8 November 2014, 12:30 AM	#10
Camel "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: Willem Location: Pretoria RSA Watch: ROLEXROLEXROLEX Posts: 1,072	Mine, on my 9¼ inch wrist - added two more links to standard Oyster bracelet after photo was taken. Attached Images __________________ Rolex Datejust II WG/SS Blue 116334 "8368xxxx" Rolex Sea-Dweller SD43 126600 "94A6xxxx" Rolex Deepsea Sea-Dweller 116660 "V84xxxx" Rolex Deepsea D-Blue Horizon 116660 "3170xxxx" Rolex Explorer II Polar 16570 "T20xxxx" Rolex Explorer II Black 216570 "G53xxxx" Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "P32xxxx" Rolex GMT-Master II Ceramic 116710LN "V97xxxx" Rolex Submariner 16610 "Z61xxxx" Rolex Submariner Ceramic 116610LN "G79xxxx"

8 November 2014, 12:42 AM	#11
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,369	Similar to subc.

8 November 2014, 01:23 AM	#12
Nycturbovr6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: New York Posts: 7,630	I like that watch a lot.

8 November 2014, 01:26 AM	#13
afc1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: Boston Posts: 1,848	I find it wears similar to a non-ceramic Submariner Date. __________________ afc1 Watch Collection: Rolex and AP

8 November 2014, 01:30 AM	#14
acr "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Mo Location: Tampa Bay Watch: GMT Posts: 280	Most comfortable Rolex I've ever worn!!!

8 November 2014, 02:38 AM	#15
Rolex-RC "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Canada Posts: 6	Now I want to switch to the blue face!

8 November 2014, 02:54 AM	#16
tkerrmd "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Real Name: Tom Location: In a race car! Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES Posts: 24,123	here it is with my GMT and sub... my son...

8 November 2014, 05:16 AM	#18
vitalsignsrn "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Judy Location: Ontario Watch: 116234 - 14060M Posts: 4,607	I've tried both DJ II & this YM. I found the YM wore smaller & was more comfortable. It felt the same as my Sub 14060. :-)

8 November 2014, 06:23 AM	#19
Mr DateJust "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Location: Glasgow, UK Watch: 16570 Posts: 909	Great pics Tom. It does look slightly less bulky than the SubC and the GMT2C. Think I need to try and see one in the metal and try it on next to my 116200 and 16570. Also need to see what sort of deal I can swing.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode