ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Which do you prefer? | |||
Red Sub (1680) | 40 | 26.14% | |
BLNR (116710) | 82 | 53.59% | |
Pepsi GMT (1675) | 15 | 9.80% | |
Something else | 16 | 10.46% | |
Voters: 153. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
6 January 2015, 10:29 AM | #1 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 45
|
Which To Choose?!
Hello:
Over the last year or so, I have purchased a number of watches, traded, sold, consolidated, etc. I currently own two watches: a Patek 5167 SS (pictured below) and a Rolex Milgauss GV. I absolutely love the Patek and I like the Milgauss, but I want something with at least a date function. I will be trading in the Milgauss and my intent is to add cash and acquire another Rolex to stay with the 1 Patek and 1 Rolex combo. I am in my late 20s and I intend to keep both this new watch and the Patek for the foreseeable future in hopes that my watch addiction is cured! My criteria for this watch is the following: --will retain it's value well --has some sort of "cool factor" --will compliment my Patek well --has at least a date function --can have the versatility to be a dress up/down watch My budget is about $8-12k and I have narrowed down my search to the following, in no particular order: 1) Red Sub 1680 2) BLNR 3) GMT 1675 Please let me know which you think would be the best fit given my age, criteria listed above, and please share any experiences with any of those 4 watches! If there is something else you would recommend that fits the criteria, please let me know as I am trying to keep an open mind. Thanks in advance! |
6 January 2015, 10:35 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,036
|
Hi Zack! You can't go wrong with any of these. But I would go for the Red Sub. I recently got one and absolutely love it. Good luck whichever you decide!!
|
6 January 2015, 10:37 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Cleveland
Posts: 557
|
The red sub or vintage GMT will retain value better than the BLNR GMT.
As for the other check boxes, they are largely personal preference. Of the three, I heavily favor the BLNR, but feel the other two watches check off more boxes on your list. |
6 January 2015, 10:38 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
|
1680
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
6 January 2015, 10:39 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
Zack I agree with Joe ya can't go wrong but of the choices you gave I like new so would go with BLNR
|
6 January 2015, 10:46 AM | #6 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Gone
Posts: 217
|
BLNR, even more so given your age. All 3 will retain their value, but on the subject of versatility unlike the BLNR or 1675 on the Jubilee there's just no way to dress that sub up.
|
6 January 2015, 10:46 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: USA
Posts: 479
|
Any Rolex will retain its value, vintage ones may even appreciate in the mid term.
Will this watch be a daily wearer or an occasional weekender?? For the former I would pick the BLNR, which is also a bit more dressy than your PP, for the latter, you can't go wrong with the "vintage" pieces. Good luck!! |
6 January 2015, 10:52 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
You can come up with all the criteria necessary to fit your needs, but I'd go with the BLNR simply because I like it best.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
6 January 2015, 11:19 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Ft. Lauderdale
Posts: 234
|
red sub
|
6 January 2015, 11:41 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Depends on the condition of the Red Sub.
Is that the actual watch in your photo? |
6 January 2015, 12:17 PM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
BLNR really says cool to me, yo!
|
6 January 2015, 12:19 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Gmt!
|
6 January 2015, 12:22 PM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,661
|
1. Red Sub (1680)
2. BLNR (116710) Great choices... All are great!
__________________
✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ Daytona C 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron. |
6 January 2015, 01:18 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
|
BLNR for me but I am not a Vintage guy. If the red sub was mint that would be my choice all day. That of course in mint condition would cost a fortune.
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki |
6 January 2015, 01:44 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Wales
Watch: 126603
Posts: 2,606
|
If you are staying with two pieces go for the BLNR, if you build your collection in the future maybe add a vintage then.
|
6 January 2015, 01:46 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Austin, TX
Watch: 116610LV HULK
Posts: 639
|
BLNR is great. Maybe consider a Hulk (green date sub). You might also want to look at a TT Daytona. The vintage beaters are cool, but don't really belong in the collection with your Patek, IMO. PS - that Patek is gorgeous!
|
6 January 2015, 01:48 PM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA
Watch: me flip
Posts: 1,021
|
I'm a sucker for the 1680 dial
|
6 January 2015, 03:11 PM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Aliso Viejo, Ca
Watch: Timex
Posts: 668
|
Blnr
|
6 January 2015, 03:14 PM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Andy
Location: GMT +7
Watch: Sub, Daytona, DD2
Posts: 742
|
Red sub, it's awesome a true classic
|
6 January 2015, 03:19 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
|
BLNR. Can be dressed up an down. Will keep you happy for a number of years.
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 |
6 January 2015, 03:25 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Eric Chan
Location: Vancouver, BC CAN
Watch: Day-Date 118238
Posts: 8,798
|
Voted BLNR.
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016 |
6 January 2015, 03:40 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: New York
Posts: 7,630
|
I would go with the blnr. I love the modern features
|
6 January 2015, 03:40 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Baris
Location: Toronto
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 477
|
BLNR.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 January 2015, 04:22 PM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: SF, south bay
Posts: 5,222
|
Blnr
|
6 January 2015, 04:59 PM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
|
BLNR for me although a Red Sub would be fantastic too.
I am wearing my BLNR today after 2 weeks away from it over Christmas and I am loving it. It's a great piece and fits very nicely into my 3 watch rotation.
__________________
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum |
6 January 2015, 05:02 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Me & Papa
Location: Echo
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 3,428
|
Gmt Blnr
|
6 January 2015, 05:39 PM | #27 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Alan
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,204
|
Have you considered the Explorer 2, 42mm, 216570? White or black dial can easily make a "one Rolex does it all" watch choice. I have a Polar and never expected to love it much as I do.With your given alternatives though, I'd vote BLNR too.
|
6 January 2015, 06:35 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,145
|
116710 for me.
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
6 January 2015, 07:31 PM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
|
Being a modern Rolex guy, I'd go for the BLNR.
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974) |
6 January 2015, 07:37 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Watch: Smurf/Hulk/1680
Posts: 2,920
|
Given your age and the fact you intend to keep the watch I would go BLNR. It is an amazing piece.
You could always look at a Hulk too. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.