ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 May 2008, 08:36 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Posts: 184
|
Day Date II
I think I must be the only person on here who actually dislikes the Deep Sea. It's arguably the most "tool" based of all of the range now but I'd rather buy two subs to be honest. Maybe it's just me, but the DD II is by far the best new thing to come out of Basel.
(Image stolen from an earlier post) |
1 May 2008, 08:38 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
I'm in the opposite camp.
I know it's a matter of personal taste and preference, but I for my part am not too fond of the DD II. Although I do like the increased case diametre (41 mm), the bezels are far too broad for my liking. Otto called them "cartoon-ish". A very apt description, imho: (Source: Pics from Basel 2008, taken by a member of a German watch forum).
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
1 May 2008, 08:40 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
I like them both but really like the new DD.
|
1 May 2008, 08:47 PM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 59
|
Quote:
|
|
1 May 2008, 08:51 PM | #5 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Simon
Location: UK
Posts: 568
|
This is absolutely down to taste. I'm a sports watch / tool watch bloke so the DD does nothing for me. The new DSSD on the other hand...........yes please.
Cheers - Simon |
1 May 2008, 09:03 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Posts: 184
|
I'm a tool watch person too but I love this one! The others look, for want of a better word, ridiculous. But this one really stands out. I also have no idea on the MSRP but guessing will be high as they're only available in WG, YG or Platty I think.
|
1 May 2008, 10:32 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,460
|
I like the way that my DD looks now,not sure about the larger size until I see one for real.
Plus the cost of a new DD II will put it out of my range. But the DSSD was a very different story, as soon as I saw it on the Rolex web site, I liked it instantly
__________________
|
1 May 2008, 10:44 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 1,001
|
I am on the fence when it comes to the DDII. I have always been a fan of the DD and love mine, still from some images I have seen including the Rolex web site, something does not look right to me. I will get a better opinion if I get a chance to see one in person.
Still I love the older model and do not feel I have less than, just because they changed the size and design a little. Just my 2C
__________________
Collection Stainless DJ II Rhodium with Arabic Dial 116334, Longines RG Master Collection Chronograph Triple Date Moon, Maurice Lacroix TT Masterpiece Triple Date Moon, Vintage Gallet SS Flying Officer Chronograph |
1 May 2008, 10:46 PM | #9 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: John
Location: Houston
Watch: Sea-dwller
Posts: 255
|
Quote:
|
|
1 May 2008, 10:55 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Steve
Location: Collegeville PA
Watch: Day-Date
Posts: 752
|
I think Rolex made an attempt to please the "Bigger is Better" tool watch crowd, but failed IMO. Just adding a big case isn't the answer. They should have scaled the bezel and dial to match. The scale and proportion look out of sorts to me.
Does anyone know if the bracelet is any wider/bulkier then the standard DD bracelet |
1 May 2008, 11:14 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Posts: 184
|
I think the goal of Rolex here is to cater to a younger audience with the DD. I'm only 22 and whilst I wouldn't consider the current DD as it's very dressy and "presidential", this new one I kinda like. I don't think many DD owners are under 30 or so and I wouldn't be surprised if this was designed to cater to a slightly younger crowd, who would usually be more likely to buy the sports models. Just my thoughts.
|
2 May 2008, 01:34 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Khanh
Location: Texas
Watch: SSGMTc
Posts: 1,227
|
I like the DDII, but must see one in person to really decide. If it looks as good as in the pics, it will be my grail watch.
The DSSD, on the other hand, is just plain too much for me.
__________________
Sea Dweller M series SS GMT IIc M series Omega SMP Electric Blue Dial Wife's SS WG MOP Ladies DJ Z series |
2 May 2008, 04:08 AM | #13 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
The new DDII in 41 mm looks fabulous. Sadly, the price would be waaaaaaaaay out of my reach.
JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
2 May 2008, 04:13 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,217
|
Depends on the dial. Some look stunning, some look hideous. I will admit the larger size does add to the overall appeal. Like JJ, it's way out of my reach. But then again, so is the 36mm DD.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668 Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation The Crown & Shield Club Honorary Member of P-Club |
2 May 2008, 04:15 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jeff
Location: Florida
Watch: PAM 1090
Posts: 3,723
|
I love the DD - I just can't afford one...
__________________
Member #471 |
2 May 2008, 04:16 AM | #16 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 739
|
Very smart looking watch! Sorry NO DSSD for me.
|
2 May 2008, 04:17 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 507
|
In my opinion, the DD is meant to be for older established gentlemen. I'm not sure Rolex has any intention to appeal to the 21-30 age group as their potential buyers would be very small. Most well established individuals probably find it hard to drop $20k on a watch. I know at my age(22) it basically took me 4 years to save for my GMT. Just my two cents.
__________________
Audemars 15707ce Lange 191.032 Patek 5990/1a Rolex 126610LN |
2 May 2008, 05:16 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Simon
Location: UK
Watch: OP and daytona
Posts: 1,783
|
I like the new DD II and have one on order but will reserve mu judgement till I see it on my wrist.
|
2 May 2008, 06:53 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: Vukota Brajovi
Location: Belgrade,Serbia
Watch: ing movies!
Posts: 3,812
|
I like new DD II!Much,much more than DS.
And,have anybody seen new Tudor Date - Day?I got only this picture and it looks kinda...odd!Let`s compare it with old ,IMHO much more ellegant model! O.K.,I know I went a little bit ,but who cares?
__________________
My fashion blog and Instagram: https://stylebyvukota.com/ https://instagram.com/vukotabrajovic/ |
2 May 2008, 07:27 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Jamie
Location: Georgia
Watch: Stainless Sub Date
Posts: 3,023
|
While I agree the proportions didn't remain the same as the size increased, I still like the watch quite a lot! 40/41mm is probably the maximum size for my wrist, but 36mm seems to be missing something since I bought my Sub. That's my perception on the new size issue so far. Having a 40mm watch seems to have changed that a bit. I wanna see one in person!
Its still, ah, very cost prohibitive of course... P.S.- love the German day text!
__________________
SUBMARINER OWNERS' CLUB
ESTABLISHED 1953 TRF Member # 5464 |
2 May 2008, 08:15 AM | #21 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
|
|
2 May 2008, 08:16 AM | #22 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Real Name: dan
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: keystone pocket
Posts: 5,917
|
i do not like the new Day Dates. The older style is classier, and IMHO, the DD white face with roman numerals is the ultimate watch.
best, dan |
2 May 2008, 08:17 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Neil
Location: West Midlands UK
Watch: DJ,DD,GMTIIc,Sub
Posts: 7,063
|
Definitely agree with you, Dan - but, then, I do have a vested interest here!
__________________
Neil 116231 SS/RG DATEJUST 2007 118238 YG DAY-DATE 2007 116713 LN SS/YG GMT IIc 2008 116613 LB SS/YG SUBMARINER 2009 216570 SS EXPLORER II 2013 116520 SS DAYTONA 2014 |
2 May 2008, 08:22 AM | #24 |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Bobby
Location: Manassas Virginia
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 305
|
I can't lie I love any rolex I see....I love them all
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.