ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
10 May 2008, 02:15 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Mike
Location: Virginia, US
Watch: SD 16600
Posts: 4,319
|
Are watches old school?
I've seen many references here on TRF to the fact that the younger generation relies on their cell phone to tell the time. I have have never really bought into this but I was out at a sports bar tonight and virtually everyone under 35 years old did not wear a watch. I have never paid attention to this in the past but it is true! The "younger" generation seems to be turning their back on watches.
Not only did they not wear a mechanical watch but they didn't wear a watch period. Not a Casio, Seiko, not even the latest fad watch of the day. What to make of this!! I have always relied on a watch and I must admit I have always assumed that wearing a watch is a given but I see that is not the case. Is it the end of our beloved Rolex? I certainly hope not but my sense is that the hey-day of the mechanical watch may be up for rough time. That, of course, has been said before! What are your thoughts?
__________________
The fool, with all his other faults, has this also - he is always getting ready to live. - Epicurus (341–270 BC) |
10 May 2008, 02:30 PM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: Canada
Watch: 16753; Bellini Dia
Posts: 1,770
|
In life, i have found there are certain kinds of people who apprieciate fine things in life, whatever form this may take. While the street hanging gangs of youths may rely upon the latest blackberry to play with the time on.
Those of the younger generation that respect the engineering and skill that went into the design and production will always enjoy the higher end watches. Rolex has nothing to worry about. Also as the watches demand quite the dollar value, it will always be a case where a certain part of the sales will be due to status symbol as well as 'shes wearing, hes wearing' thing. Never fear, quality will outlast fad.
__________________
The trouble with having an open mind, of course, is that people will insist on coming along and trying to put things in it. SS Submariner no date 1992 (sold); SS GMT II 2007 (sold); SS GMT II C 2008 ('M' series) (sold); SS Sub C 2011 (sold); BB GMT 1971 (sold); Omega 50th GMT |
10 May 2008, 02:39 PM | #3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Phil
Location: Perth Australia
Watch: LV
Posts: 201
|
Most of the music clips still have artists wearing a watch
|
10 May 2008, 03:28 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,824
|
Mike, I think that watches will be around pretty much forever. In some form, anyway. In addition to being tools to tell time, they do other things. Several companies are working to integrate communications devices (cell phone or text devices) into a wrist unit= Dick Tracy. There will always be people who appreciate quality as stated by shedlock. Unfortunately, mechanical watches are less in demand and fewer people are learning to make them. So ultimately, there will be much less of them. In some way, I think that Rolex's recent intro of very expensive watches in very limited numbers is a tactic to position themselves for this future. Now Rolexes are expensive, but most people (in the industrialized world) can aspire to own one. It may take a while and some discipline, but do-able. That's not as true about some of the even higher end watches. I think Rolex is trying to move into a more rarefied market to compete in a time when they can make fewer watches, yet retain market value. Definitely a long term plan, but one, IMHO, that will work. And then again they may start making cheap plastic watches that double as garage openers.
__________________
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." "So you have enemies. Good. You must have stood up for something, sometime in your life." Winston Churchill |
10 May 2008, 04:48 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: rolexforums.com
Posts: 5,438
|
considering myself still young (mid 30s)... when not wearing my rolex... i do rely on my mobile phone for the time but, then again i use it for text, music, camera, email, video, gps etc etc its become the new tool of a newer generation.
__________________
And ever has it been that love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation. |
10 May 2008, 06:59 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Posts: 184
|
I'm only young but I've more or less always worn a watch. I think there's something cold and boring about looking at the time on a phone. A watch is something more "alive" so to speak. The other thing of course is that until the age of about 18, you don't really care what time it is anyway!
|
10 May 2008, 07:10 PM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
Old School Rocks!!!
Well...we must admit it, we're already old now!!! lol!!!
OLD SKOOL ROCKS!!! |
10 May 2008, 07:17 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Bo
Location: Denmark
Watch: Rolex, of course!
Posts: 22,436
|
Might sound like old school (might sound like something else? ...wait for it!) but I feel naked without my Rolex on my wrist.
__________________
With kind regards, Bo LocTite 221: The Taming Of The Screw... |
10 May 2008, 07:19 PM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
|
|
10 May 2008, 07:47 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: SF BAY AREA CA
Watch: 16710 Coke
Posts: 3,047
|
I do double check the correct time on my cell every now and then...but when I'm on vacation...( or holiday for those across the pond...) my rolex is the only thing I take....and a book...and some sun screen.....and.....well you get my drift.
__________________
Rolex Blue TT Submariner (95) Rolex SS GMT IIc (08) Rolex GMT II 16710 COKE (08 for me..) Rolex Explorer II Blk (91) Breitling SuperOcean Steelfish (07) Panerai 104 & 177ti ( 04/03) |
10 May 2008, 07:53 PM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Peter
Location: Sydney
Watch: The Game
Posts: 17,415
|
I think we talking about the generation gap. Its real and is here now. Does this mean our Rolex's won't be worth a fortune as was posted in another thread today. no one will want them in 30 years time.!!!!!!!!!!!!
|
10 May 2008, 07:53 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: Oxfordshire, UK
Watch: 116680 & 116622
Posts: 3,953
|
I totally agree
__________________
"...why oh why, didn't I take the blue pill...?" http://www.helenanddouglas.org.uk/ www.cheetah.org |
11 May 2008, 12:02 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
A watch is timeless. Watches were cool before school even had a name.
|
11 May 2008, 12:07 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Brendan
Location: Cougar Country
Posts: 825
|
|
11 May 2008, 12:12 AM | #15 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
Maybe they leave their watches at home because they don't want to immediately be picked out as someone who hasn't yet "made it"
Nothing is worse for today's youth than to be found out as a poser..
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
11 May 2008, 12:34 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Sir
Location: Melbourne
Watch: F-series SD
Posts: 8,589
|
Frankly, I think that mobile phones are terribly inelegant objects - I associate them with rushing about and having to listen to the meaningless life story of the loud halfwit at the next table. They're simply tools with neither grace nor charm. Besides, has anybody heard of a mobile that's classic in the same manner as a DRSD or a Paul Newman Daytona? An old mobile phone's simply a relic that's only fit for the rubbish tip because it doesn't have the latest capabilities.
__________________
You buy a Casio to make sure you're on time; you wear a Rolex because you don't have to be on time. |
11 May 2008, 01:01 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sri Lanka
Watch: PP 5146 & AP 15300
Posts: 281
|
The earliest watch I had was a TMNT (Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles) Michaelangelo wristwatch - think I got it when I was around 3years old. Over the years I've been though many Swatches and for the longest time had a very yellow G-Shock.
I then received a Tissot PRS200 Chrono (quartz) for my 18th birthday from Mom and a Tissot LeLocle on my 20th - which was my first mechanical, automatic. For 25 years old, I am rather old fashioned; this may be why I seem to have trouble making friends in my own age group. Not only do I love my timepieces, I also do feel naked without having one my wrist. I'm also into fountain pen collection, fine wines and oh do I love my single malts and cubans ;-)
__________________
Here's my 2016 Watch collection with Patek, Audemars, Rolex, Omega - SOTC Video 2016 |
11 May 2008, 01:07 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Hamilton, MI USA
Watch: My beloved TT DJ
Posts: 3,831
|
Simply, "No". I hope I never see that day that wrist watches fall out of popular favor.
__________________
My Trusty TT DJ |
11 May 2008, 01:12 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Real Name: Allen
Location: SC
Posts: 2,766
|
Same here, even sitting around the house I prefer to have one on.
__________________
Instagram @HDHNTER |
11 May 2008, 01:16 AM | #20 |
-
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Erwin
Location: Hollywood, Ca
Watch: SD
Posts: 1,032
|
I think this new generation's more focus on the new technology that's evolved ( iphones, gps ipods apple comp ) and watches for them is not really a necessity anymore!
__________________
Your watch silently speaks about your character! sd/datejust/tudor/a couple of vintage omegas/tissotMB Meisterstuck Bordeaux pen/MB Noblesse Oblige/Starwalker/MB Classique Fountain pen/MB no 149 |
11 May 2008, 01:23 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Funny. I've noticed this also. I work in an industry where the median age is 34-35, and most of the under 30 crowd doesn't wear watches. In fact, one 25 year old ask me recently - "you still wear a watch" ? I chuckled and said - "why, of course, I need to be at my appointments on time".
|
11 May 2008, 02:27 AM | #22 | |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: John Kim
Location: Cerriros, CA
Watch: Blue Submariner TT
Posts: 380
|
Quote:
I have 2 Casios that I adore.... but man, they haven't got any wrist time in 2 years. Good thing they are solar powered and Atomic. It keeps time without any adjustment, and I just keep it beside my bed for "power failure" backups. The day I stop wearing my watch for the sake of "fashion" is the day that underwear goes out of style. Even then, I'll keep wering my watch. |
|
11 May 2008, 02:43 AM | #23 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Dal
Location: Seattle
Watch: 168000
Posts: 1,614
|
[QUOTE=Trurolexer;580565]Well...we must admit it, we're already old now!!! lol!!QUOTE]
speak for yourself buddy, I'm gonna invest on getting some new hair, new pecs and hot young girlfriend. Get a new lease on life or something. |
11 May 2008, 03:29 AM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,824
|
[QUOTE=Dalton;580907]
Hey, Dalton, you live in the factory outlet store for eternal youth. Go see my younger brother's best bud from grade school-college, Garth Fisher, Plastic Surgeon to the Stars. He'll supply everything but the girlfriend. Of course hot young girlfriends are available by the truckload, if your wallet biopsy turns up positive. Come to think of it, save what you were going to spend of the makeover and buy her a Rolex (or 3.)
__________________
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." "So you have enemies. Good. You must have stood up for something, sometime in your life." Winston Churchill |
11 May 2008, 04:47 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 41
|
I am in the under 30 group (27) and I do the same thing. I would always check my cell phone for the time even when I’m wearing a watch.
But I do have the same problem as Bo, will feel naked without a watch. Almost never leave the house without a watch on, even I know I would be using my cell phone to tell time. |
11 May 2008, 04:53 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 3,295
|
Watches are still alive and well in the young generation.
__________________
__________________ |
11 May 2008, 05:42 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Syracuse, NY
Watch: LV C
Posts: 2,204
|
I have NEEDED a watch on my wrist since 2nd grade. I have no idea why this passion for timepieces came about in my young life but it did. Haven't been without one on my wrist since. Of course back then calculator watches were the thing!!
|
11 May 2008, 05:54 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: UK
Posts: 7,023
|
Youngsters and watches
Well my oldest is 18 and he loves his watches, has a Casio at the moment and wants a Rolex sports watch!
My 17 year old wears my old 1950's bumper Omega and the youngest has a swatch watch! I am a terrible influence on my children |
11 May 2008, 11:22 AM | #29 | |
TechXpert
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Dal
Location: Seattle
Watch: 168000
Posts: 1,614
|
[QUOTE=Beef;580961]
Quote:
|
|
11 May 2008, 12:49 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mililani, Oahu
Posts: 1,307
|
Watches are lame. Cell phone time forever!!!!
I kinda agree I don't see too many kids wearing watches. But tehre will always be a market. There's always a need. So far, I've not seen a runners wear cell phones to keep time. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.