ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 July 2015, 05:09 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Andrew
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Watch: SS Sub 16610
Posts: 12
|
RSC Needs?
So I've just recently bought my Rolex (16610) and it had just returned from the RSC so it could be sold in as new condition as possible. So for the time being I'm good. But I know in due time I will need to send my watch off and I know its always been 5-7 years and now I'm hearing 10. Assuming you watch is being used just for normal wear and you don't see any issues with anything, is there a need to send it sooner than later? Is using the moto "If it ain't broke don't fix it" good, or should I have a "timer" so that I should send my watch out when the time comes?
My father has had his for 20 some odd years and to my knowledge he's never sent it back. Certainly not within the past 15 years. I've never seen that watch off his wrist for longer than a couple hours. Thanks Andrew |
5 July 2015, 05:17 AM | #2 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
It's always been little more than a recommendation, not a mandatory time period. If you wear your watch in harsh conditions and it gets pretty beat up, I would think that sooner would be a good choice.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
5 July 2015, 05:25 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Norcal
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 82
|
I know it's against all the recommendations but I just recently had my 16610 serviced and it had been over 15 years since it's last service. It was a daily watch for me and kept great time until just before the service.
As far as I know it didn't cost me any more to service the watch. |
5 July 2015, 05:51 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,354
|
Quote:
__________________
"Appreciate your life!" |
|
5 July 2015, 05:54 AM | #5 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Tim
Location: Pennsylvania
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 72,258
|
Agree with this. Also don't forget that rubber seals deteriorate over time which will compromise water resistance.
__________________
Rolex Submariner 14060M Omega Seamaster 2254.50 DOXA Professional 1200T Card carrying member of TRF's Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons TRF's "After Dark" Bar & NightClub Patron P Club Member #17 2 FA ENABLED
|
5 July 2015, 06:21 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: California, USA
Posts: 65
|
I think service is good to the watch but my interval would be 10-12 years.
|
5 July 2015, 06:41 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,078
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.