ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 July 2015, 02:13 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: GMT Master ll
Posts: 1,036
|
Rolex magnification issue is my watch 2 1/2
I'm also new to this blog I know there's been some issues with the magnification on the cyclone I like to ask your expert opinions whether or not my watch is 2 1/2 my eyesight isn't like it used to be and the bigger I can get it the better I only purchased a watch just about a week ago so wouldn't be an issue getting it look after many thanks to all
|
12 July 2015, 02:14 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
|
Lookin good
|
12 July 2015, 02:18 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Real Name: Steve
Location: Shasta
Watch: es..More Watches!
Posts: 2,415
|
Looks good. I've read elsewhere that it should be about the same size as the numbers on the bezel. My GMT looks to have about the same mag. Congrats on the new piece!
|
12 July 2015, 02:23 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: GMT Master ll
Posts: 1,036
|
Rolex magnification issue
thanks that's good advice
|
12 July 2015, 02:23 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Great Plains
Watch: Exp II 216570 Blk
Posts: 1,190
|
I agree. It looks good.
|
12 July 2015, 02:28 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
|
You're fine. If you're 2.3 and over, you're a-ok
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
12 July 2015, 02:32 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Tom
Location: World Traveler
Watch: GMT Master II BLNR
Posts: 1,583
|
This is one of the more magnified dates I've seen on the BLNR. Looks good.
|
12 July 2015, 02:35 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
|
Looks like mine too! Based on the responses so far I guess we are both OK.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time |
12 July 2015, 02:35 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Syed
Location: The Ether
Posts: 3,388
|
Could be a lot worse.
Maybe a bit small, but that seems fine |
12 July 2015, 04:06 AM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
Yours looks a lot like mine.
Hold yours out at an arms length. If it's too small to read, you need glasses.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
12 July 2015, 04:24 AM | #11 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Richie
Location: "Nowhere Man"
Watch: out now,take care!
Posts: 29,776
|
Congrats . I think you got a winner there.
__________________
"I love to work at nothing all day" TRF #139960 |
12 July 2015, 05:10 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: DateJust
Posts: 185
|
Looks fine to me as well.....
|
12 July 2015, 07:05 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough
Posts: 3,759
|
All good
__________________
Rolex • Tudor • Omega • Panerai |
12 July 2015, 07:09 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
Looks about like mine. I would not worry.
|
12 July 2015, 08:26 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Wesley
Location: Austin
Watch: 214270
Posts: 630
|
Looks the same as mine. I don't think they are 2.5x (personally think they are just under 2x), but that is good enough for me. When looking at it straight on, the height of the magnified date window is about the same as the width of the 6 on the bezel, which gives it a balanced look IMO.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.