ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
7 August 2015, 12:00 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Seoul Korea
Posts: 149
|
wrist size + 15400 pics please
would really appreciate if all you 15400 owners can post a pic of it on your wrist WITH a description of your wrist size so i can get a clear picture of what it would look like on wrist.
Many thanks guys I have a 6.7inch wrist (17 cm) |
7 August 2015, 12:12 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
|
I don't know my wrist size. Honestly, I think wrist shape is more important than wrist size with the 15400 due to the longer lugs. It's a watch I highly recommend trying on before purchasing. You can always post wrist shots/arm shots here of you wearing it and ask for opinions. You also need to consider how it looks on all of you compared to a 3 inch surface on your wrist.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using Tapatalk
__________________
---------------------- Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches |
7 August 2015, 12:17 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Seoul Korea
Posts: 149
|
i guess you have a good point on the shape of your wrist. thanks for pics,
hopefully someone else with wrist measurements can post as well :) my wrist is flat, however i have a buldging wrist bone ball that pops out |
7 August 2015, 12:19 AM | #4 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
|
Quote:
I will tell you that you won't regret purchasing this watch if it fits your wrist; and with a flat wrist, you are off to a great start! If it's too big, there is always the Jumbo or 15300. I personally liked how this fit on my wrist (and the slight style differences of it) more than the other two watches.
__________________
---------------------- Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches |
|
7 August 2015, 12:22 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
|
the buldger - I know it well, card carrying member. steel bracelets are better for this issue relative to leather is my experience. im 6.5 and rock the 15202. perfection.
|
7 August 2015, 12:25 AM | #6 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,300
|
my wrist is slightly larger than yours and relatively flat. i tried on both the white and blue 15400s at a boutique and found the white to seem a bit too large, while the blue looked very nice.
for the overall aesthetic, though, i would go with a 15300 if i were in the market for an RO (setting aside the jumbo solely for price (for me) reasons). on me, the 15400 was decidedly on the sport side, and i think i would want something a bit more restrained (so, 15300). |
7 August 2015, 12:46 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Seoul Korea
Posts: 149
|
Quote:
I think the reason people prefer the aesthetics of 15300 > 15400 is due to the "head" of the watch being parallel to the bracelet ;; as opposed to the 15400s head popping out before the bracelet i however like the big head |
|
7 August 2015, 01:28 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 8,615
|
Quote:
Agreed. I also like the dial layout better. I like the short marker at 3 o'clock, the colored date wheel, and I think the double stocks at the 12 look WAY better than the AP. I also like the dial to bezel ratio on the 15400 better; and the fat short end of the second hand of the 15300 is a real turn off for me.
__________________
---------------------- Instagram: watchesandchickensandwiches |
|
7 August 2015, 02:19 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Seoul Korea
Posts: 149
|
Quote:
would be cool if they were to make a thicker width of the 15400 bracelet so it has that parallel aesthetic of the head to the bracelet. |
|
7 August 2015, 12:33 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: JF
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rolex Sub 1680
Posts: 1,426
|
I have a 7.5" wrist and wear 42MM ROO all the time but when it comes to RO, I prefer the 15202 or even the 15300. I had a 15400 and just did not like how big it felt on my wrist (even though it wasn't tall) for a dress watch.
|
7 August 2015, 12:45 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Jason
Location: Maine
Watch: AP & Patek
Posts: 462
|
I have about the same size wrist as you. Sorry not the best of photos but i added what the GMT looks like on my wrist in case you can compare it to that.
|
7 August 2015, 12:42 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: US
Posts: 3,257
|
6.5in
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
7 August 2015, 03:21 AM | #13 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
I've got a flat 6.5" wrist and found that the 39mm 15300 fit me better than the 15400.
Having said that the 15202 fits even better due to the thinness of the case and how the integrated bracelet wraps around my wrist (even more than the 15300). |
7 August 2015, 09:36 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,284
|
7.5" very flat wrist.......and my APs fit me perfectly
__________________
. The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings... ——————————————————————————————————— . 16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. GMW-B5000D. |
7 August 2015, 09:38 AM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
|
6.5 - wrist bone buldger, 15202
|
7 August 2015, 09:40 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
|
6.75 inches of goodness here
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous |
9 August 2015, 06:10 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Seoul Korea
Posts: 149
|
|
7 August 2015, 04:58 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Seoul Korea
Posts: 149
|
thanks for the pics guys, leaning more towards the 15400
i guess i cant go wrong either way :) |
7 August 2015, 05:44 PM | #19 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Midwest USA
Watch: AP PP Rolex
Posts: 3,348
|
great thread...
with all these great pics...can't wait for the "incoming thread" |
7 August 2015, 06:42 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Craig
Location: Sydney
Watch: 4 Broken glass
Posts: 5,808
|
7.5in wrist (but more rounded than flat), in the end it was too big for me and I traded it to put towards my Day Date.... Still an awesome watch the 15202 might have been a better choice, but was more than I wanted to pay at the time. One day i will buy another RO but maybe an early original classic 36mm.
__________________
Day Date 118206, Daytona 116509 & 116505, AP 25859ST Gone but not forgotten and genuinely missed..... Root Beer GMT, Sub, TT Daytona, YG DD Bark, Datejust(2 his & hers), AP RO, PP Aquanaut, Lange 1, Heuer Monza, Piaget Altiplano, GP Chrono, Seamaster, Tudor Sub, Tudor Chrono, Tudor Black Bay Bronze |
8 August 2015, 03:40 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alexandria, VA
Watch: Love them.
Posts: 1,095
|
I would go for a 15400. Nice layout on the dial and I like having a seconds hand.
|
8 August 2015, 03:41 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Alexandria, VA
Watch: Love them.
Posts: 1,095
|
7.75 wrist....
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.