ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 October 2015, 01:39 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Thomas
Location: Leicester, UK
Watch: 1914 Zenith PW
Posts: 20
|
Which Adjustment Clasp Do you Prefer ?
Hello All,
To help me make my decision between a GMT Master II with Black Bezel or a Submariner with Black Bezel, which adjustment clasp do you find to the best - Guidelock on the Submariner or GMT Half link adjustment ! |
14 October 2015, 01:41 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
Glidelock. But easy link is nice too.
|
14 October 2015, 01:42 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Glidelock
__________________
|
14 October 2015, 01:47 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Yes Please!
Posts: 6,691
|
Glide lock is better but I prefer the GMT watch more
|
14 October 2015, 01:56 AM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Richie
Location: "Nowhere Man"
Watch: out now,take care!
Posts: 29,775
|
Glidelock
__________________
"I love to work at nothing all day" TRF #139960 |
14 October 2015, 01:58 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,637
|
Glidelock by far
|
14 October 2015, 02:02 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 2,335
|
Glidelock is better in my opinion, wish Rolex would offer this clasp adjustment feature to GMT!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
14 October 2015, 02:03 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Singapore
Posts: 177
|
By Clasp GlideLock is definitely favoured over the EasyLink.
But the DSSD version is most engineered of the bunch. Then again its a weird way to decide on the watch by just the clasp. |
14 October 2015, 02:12 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
|
Both are nice but Glidelock is the best.
__________________
|
14 October 2015, 02:14 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,652
|
Glidelock, simply amazing, the perfect fit all the time. Some with narrow wrists have found the clasp a little long though. No issue for me.
|
14 October 2015, 02:16 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: John
Location: Toronto
Watch: 214270
Posts: 721
|
Looks like I'm in the minority here, but I prefer the Easy Link. Mine is perfect for normal conditions with the EL closed, and when it's hot and humid I can pop it open without even opening the clasp for some extra room. Personally I don't need 10 different positions.
__________________
instagram: jaschtag |
14 October 2015, 02:36 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chicago
Watch: Subc AT 8500 CSO
Posts: 3,646
|
Glidelock is the best. It has the most flexibility, and is very easy to use.
|
14 October 2015, 02:38 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Cambridge, NY
Posts: 1,089
|
Glide lock without a doubt!
|
14 October 2015, 02:40 AM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
|
Does anyone know if the DSSD Glidelock can be fitted to a Sub C? Sorry to high jack the thread, but I've always wondered
|
14 October 2015, 02:43 AM | #15 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,009
|
Glidelock and wish it was on every sports model!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
14 October 2015, 03:12 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: .
Location: .
Watch: 228238, 4500v, 126
Posts: 771
|
Glidelock, I hardly ever use my easy link.
|
14 October 2015, 03:15 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 893
|
Glidelock provides a superior fit because it is adjustable in smLler increments. The downside of the Glidelock is that the clasp cover is large. This is only problematic when trying to center the clasp on smaller wrists.
|
14 October 2015, 03:23 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Ron
Location: Arizona, USA
Watch: 116233
Posts: 3,180
|
The Easylink on my GMT is great and after some initial adjustment I was able to get a perfect fit. I did not need a half link....for that matter I'm not sure you can source one for the GMT, rather you would get a Sub half link. I'm intrigued by the Glidelock and think that overall it is the better of the two. Regardless, I would not let the clasp be the deciding factor on choosing a watch. The GMT and the Sub have lots of differences. Decide which one meets your needs better.
__________________
so many Rolexes.....so little time |
14 October 2015, 03:24 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
|
honestly once I have the watch sized correctly I never touch the glide lock or the easy link so really doesn't matter
|
14 October 2015, 03:30 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
Glidelock. Perfect Clasp. Hard to convince myself to get a new watch without it.
|
14 October 2015, 03:30 AM | #21 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,054
|
Glidelock for me too. So easy to fine-tune and adjust.
|
14 October 2015, 03:32 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 1,759
|
|
14 October 2015, 04:01 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: New York
Posts: 976
|
Glidelock all the way, but the easy link is sufficient for most daily occasions. I can't quickly size it for my wife, which might be leg up as well;-))
And i prefer the GMT, so there, wins all around. |
14 October 2015, 04:09 AM | #24 |
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,510
|
Glidelock
__________________
JJ |
14 October 2015, 04:09 AM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
|
|
14 October 2015, 04:10 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NYC / Milan
Watch: 6263
Posts: 3,938
|
Glidelock, and frankly hard to see how the Easylink could be said to be preferable in any circumstance but happy to hear the thinking if anyone believes it is. Both are of course great innovations and make the ownership of modern pieces even better!
|
14 October 2015, 04:28 AM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: HK & USA
Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV
Posts: 2,001
|
Easy Link. If your watch is fitted correctly in the first place it does it's job perfectly when your wrist swells. It's an unobtrusive, simple fire and forget system. I have no need (or need to pay) for something as over-engineered and over-large as the Glidelock, and honestly don't think about my wrist enough to feel a need for constantly fiddling with a watch clasp in 2mm increments throughout the day. Far too fussy for my taste, and don't like the Thor-wrist amulet feel and look.
|
14 October 2015, 05:13 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,792
|
Glidelock!!! I like to wear my watch "snug" so I can always have a perfect fit.
It truly has ruined some of my other watches for me, I like it so much, I will probably go with another Sub for my next. |
14 October 2015, 05:20 AM | #29 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA
Watch: me flip
Posts: 1,021
|
Quote:
|
|
14 October 2015, 05:26 AM | #30 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
|
Glidelock if given a choice but my 16613 which is properly sized needs no adjusting so ultimately Dr. Tom is correct!! buy the model you want, don't worry about the clasp. JMHO
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego" |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.