ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 November 2015, 05:40 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 86
|
Tritium V Luminova
As the patina is so sought after and discussed, would yany of you think that the tritium dial would be better bet for future appreciation and resale of, say a 14060. After 2001= superluminova or before 2001= tritium.
|
19 November 2015, 05:46 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
For me personally I always prefer tritium. I love patina and that is something that modern dials will never give me.
|
19 November 2015, 05:57 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
|
For a 14060, I would choose the Luminova (1998-1999) or the Super Luminova (after 2000). Tritium and WG surrounds are a mismatch. IMHO.
|
19 November 2015, 08:20 AM | #4 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
Quote:
Since the changeover to Luminova occurred in ~98/99 (Luinova and Super Luminova are the same compound) There may be a few 14060s that have it, and there may be a few 14060Ms that have tritium. Either is rare. As to sought after, or future appreciation and resale, it likely doesn't make a lot of difference as long as the dial is original. If a Luminova dial is a replacement on a 14060 then the circle of potential owners may be reduced if you believe that there is a huge number who want originality. I think that, overall, any 14060 or 14060M in top shape will sell for about the same with or without a replacement dial - condition is paramount.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
19 November 2015, 08:54 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: UK
Posts: 86
|
many thanks again and very useful information.
|
19 November 2015, 09:12 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: MDangerSteel
Location: Canada
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 2,301
|
It would probably come down to personal preference.I like both, but that definitely ends on what you use the watch for I guess.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel |
19 November 2015, 11:59 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 733
|
|
19 November 2015, 12:17 PM | #8 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 178
|
You might be surprised: the luminova on my late 90s Seamaster Pro has turned quite brown. Also doesn't glow well anymore, so it's pretty similar to the Tritium experience. ;)
|
20 November 2015, 02:32 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: The aperture
Posts: 4,941
|
|
20 November 2015, 05:02 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 178
|
No, it's actually pretty common with SMPs of the era, for whatever reason.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.