One Word: TUDOR

[AbsolutelyROLEX!]

I was just at a local Rolex Boutique, and took a look at the Tudor line and was absolutely blown away!
The new stuff they are coming out with, the designs and looks and quality is just amazing!
Im wondering if rolex is creating their own competiton within! Making their own Tudor movements and everything.
And I am really surprised Tudor is not catching on as well in the US, and i think they are moving up in the quality field instead of just being a "poor mans line" cheap alternative

[GerardoG]

They are making outstanding products...and it is a big hit. We posted a poll here and found an impressive number of Tudor owners.

[Stealthmode29]

I'm not surprised. I don't know why anyone would save up just enough to get a Tudor. Save a little more a little longer and get the real thing. I don't get the attraction for this brand. It's a Rolex spin off plain and simple. Just my opinion.

[ap1]

Room for both - 10x price, not 10x more enjoyment. Much tighter spread.

[padi56]

Originally Posted by anderl712000

I was just at a local Rolex Boutique, and took a look at the Tudor line and was absolutely blown away!
The new stuff they are coming out with, the designs and looks and quality is just amazing!
Im wondering if rolex is creating their own competiton within! Making their own Tudor movements and everything.
And I am really surprised Tudor is not catching on as well in the US, and i think they are moving up in the quality field instead of just being a "poor mans line" cheap alternative

IMHO Tudor has never been a poor mans alternative and have always produced quality watches.

[ap1]

BbN

[Rick_Nashville]

I'd say that Tudor is very popular in the US. I've been collecting them since 2012. I find them visually appealing and satisfying to own.

I also think that Tudor has crafted a solid, if not ingenious, business plan to attract 20-somethings into the world of Swiss mechanical watches at affordable price points. Then, IMO, after a few years of ownership, lots of watch-wearing pleasure and enjoyment, and maybe some promotions at work, lol, these respective Tudor buyers are more likely to stay loyal to the overall corporate organization and make the leap to Rolex.

Regards, -rick.

[SemperFi]

Of course I have no statistics to back it up but I believe that Tudor is probably doing quite well in the U.S. They make a quality product at a great price point. The Black Bay Black in particular was a smash hit among members of this forum when it was introduced.
Tudor has gained a foothold and will only solidify their position as they open up more stores here in the U.S.

[Tmac478]

Originally Posted by Stealthmode29

I'm not surprised. I don't know why anyone would save up just enough to get a Tudor. Save a little more a little longer and get the real thing. I don't get the attraction for this brand. It's a Rolex spin off plain and simple. Just my opinion.

The real thing? I own 2 Rolex's and a Tudor Black Bay Red. The Black Bay is one of my favorite watches and looks nothing like any Rolex I've even seen. Just my opinion ;-)

[itsmekevin]

Originally Posted by Stealthmode29

I'm not surprised. I don't know why anyone would save up just enough to get a Tudor. Save a little more a little longer and get the real thing. I don't get the attraction for this brand. It's a Rolex spin off plain and simple. Just my opinion.

I respectfully disagree. IMO, I think a lot of Tudor owners can afford a Rolex (or own they already own multiple Rolexes already), although it was originally marketed as a more affordable alternative. Although I'm not currently a Tudor owner, the Black Bay Black and Pelagos Blue has my attention.

[thusalwaystotyrants]

Originally Posted by ap1

BbN

Beautiful!!

[Stealthmode29]

Originally Posted by Tmac478

The real thing? I own 2 Rolex's and a Tudor Black Bay Red. The Black Bay is one of my favorite watches and looks nothing like any Rolex I've even seen. Just my opinion ;-)

yes, the real thing. In my opinion they are all just submariner alternatives. I would personally invest in a patek, AP or panerai when I'm ready to add to my line up. Again, just my opinion. Of course if there is something you see in this brand then by all means enjoy. It's like buying a 3 series when you already own a 7 series. <shrug>

[padi56]

Originally Posted by Stealthmode29

I'm not surprised. I don't know why anyone would save up just enough to get a Tudor. Save a little more a little longer and get the real thing. I don't get the attraction for this brand. It's a Rolex spin off plain and simple. Just my opinion.

It always makes me smile when I see this type of post as many today don't wear a watch they just wear the brand.The Tudor line go right back to the 1920s then mainly sold in Canada and Europe, Rolex or Tudor watches were not sold then in the USA,it was very much later the the Rolex brand arrived for sale in the USA.Hans Wilsdorf from the RWC first opened Tudor watch to world wide production in 1946 . And one of the main reasons why he chose the brand name Tudor. Was that he wanted to pay tribute to the Tudor history period of old England.

The Tudor line prior to around 1990 was 100% all Rolex except for movement,Tudor watches are made by the same Rolex brand maker. The major difference between a Tudor and a Rolex is that Rolex contracted the manufacturing of the movement out to a 3rd party manufacturer (ETA in 95% of them).Very much like Rolex did with all there chronographs before 2000 they used ETA Valoux and Zenith movements so are they a Rolex just because they have the brand name yet movement is from ETA just like the Tudor.Now the ETA ebauche movements were made to Rolex's specifications but rotors signed Tudor. This movement was then sent to Rolex where it was assembled into a watch with all Rolex remaining parts (Rolex case, bezel, strap or bracelet,dial, crystal and crown, seals, etc.). These parts are the same parts used in the Rolex line of watches. The Tudor movements are high grade 17, 21, 25, or 26 jewel Automatic or Manual movements which when correctly cleaned, timed, and oiled, will keep time almost as well as any normal Rolex.

The case screw backs were engraved original oyster case by Rolex,on all the oyster models.In the gold or TT models Tudor uses genuine solid gold Rolex bezels and crown caps, but their bracelets are normally only gold filled,to reduce the cost while Rolex uses solid gold in their bracelets.The French Navy (among others) opted for the Tudor Submariner,instead of the Rolex Sub.
The French Navy demanded rigorous testing and tested several brands These watches were tested to carefully calibrated abusive tests in an attempt to destroy them to see how much abuse it could take before losing accuracy or malfunctioning .After testing they choose the Tudor and the only thing the French navy didn't order was the Oyster bracelet.They chose a nylon strap because it would be much more easy to change,and easily replaced if broken.And today the only step down in quality with Tudor watches in general is the price.The the main difference between a Rolex Sub and say a Tudor Sub is they used a top range Chronometer grade ETA a first class all in-house built movement but not Rolex made,and in watches like the Tudor Prince they used a light Oyster bracelet, on Subs they used the heavy Oyster bracelet.Now today the Tudor line has quite a heritage with Hans Wilsdorf the founder of Rolex and a 100% rightful place in the Rolex watch forum..

[AK797]

And also a great Royal House of England, ended the Wars of the Roses.

[Swearengen]

What Padi just said
Alternating between Rolex and my Tudor BB there is no noticeable difference in quality. When I strap on my PP 5712, now that's a different sport

[bigwatchman]

Originally Posted by Stealthmode29

I'm not surprised. I don't know why anyone would save up just enough to get a Tudor. Save a little more a little longer and get the real thing. I don't get the attraction for this brand. It's a Rolex spin off plain and simple. Just my opinion.

Either you get it or you don't.... Those who know Tudor end up with a Tudor. I've been through a few Rolex and Omegas and have wound up perfectly happy with my BBR on my wrist and no Rolex in the stable. Way more bang for my buck which equals more enjoyment on my wrist. Five to ten years ago I wouldn't have thought this way but hanging out here for a few years will change a person's outlook.... Cheers....

[AbsolutelyROLEX!]

Yes it seems the black bays have caught on quite well and the heritage series
But they make so many beautiful chronographs and dress watches now, mens and womens
And you dont see much of those

[Micha]

Originally Posted by Stealthmode29

I'm not surprised. I don't know why anyone would save up just enough to get a Tudor. Save a little more a little longer and get the real thing. I don't get the attraction for this brand. It's a Rolex spin off plain and simple. Just my opinion.

Could not be as polite and diplomatic as Padi, I would just call this an ignorant statement ...

[belk7]

Originally Posted by Stealthmode29

I'm not surprised. I don't know why anyone would save up just enough to get a Tudor. Save a little more a little longer and get the real thing. I don't get the attraction for this brand. It's a Rolex spin off plain and simple. Just my opinion.

I'm glad to see fewer and fewer people coming on the forum with these misinformed sentiments recently. A testament to more people being better educated and actually seeing and owning the brand.

I own several brands, including Rolex and multiple Tudors, both modern and vintage. I get just as much pleasure from wearing the Tudors as I do any of the others - and that include PP, ALS, and AP FWIW. The new Heritage line is extremely well executed, and my older Big Block and 94110 will never leave my collection. Tudor gives us high quality watches with style choices that do not exist in the Rolex line-up. And the fact that they are more affordable it NOT a bad thing.

As for pedigree and history, Padi nails it with the post above.

[nick c]

Originally Posted by Stealthmode29

I'm not surprised. I don't know why anyone would save up just enough to get a Tudor. Save a little more a little longer and get the real thing. I don't get the attraction for this brand. It's a Rolex spin off plain and simple. Just my opinion.

Hi bud Tudor is the real thing I own 4 and don't need to save up

[Dan Pierce]

I've owned Patek, which lead me to Rolex, which lead me to Tudor. It was a choice. Very satisfied with my evolution.
dP

[bdex75]

Originally Posted by Micha

Could not be as polite and diplomatic as Padi, I would just call this an ignorant statement ...

X2.

I have had subs and DJ's and a DSSD and currently own none of the above as they always ended up hardly ever being worn when I get some form of a Tudor or other brand.

I keep a blue stick DJ2 just as a casual watch and wear it to the office when a sport or dress watch is not more appropriate. But I do find myself appreciating the other brands just as much. But I wont wear a Rolex just because it is a Rolex.

Many (including a lot here) would say that Rolex has become way to expensive for the level of horology.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[superdog]

A watch that costs circa 3,000 $'S should never ever be referred to as a poor mans watch.

I mean....cmon....

[Newbie@SIN]

Indeed, I never thought I would end up with a Tudor. Was considering to get Hulk last year but once I tried on the BB Blue, there was no turning back. Bought it immediately after I wore it...at a very good price too at from an AD (S$4k or equivalent to about US$2.8k).

It has been my daily wearer for almost a year now and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future.

[GB-man]

Originally Posted by padi56

It always makes me smile when I see this type of post as many today don't wear a watch they just wear the brand.The Tudor line go right back to the 1920s then mainly sold in Canada and Europe, Rolex or Tudor watches were not sold then in the USA,it was very much later the the Rolex brand arrived for sale in the USA.Hans Wilsdorf from the RWC first opened Tudor watch to world wide production in 1946 . And one of the main reasons why he chose the brand name Tudor. Was that he wanted to pay tribute to the Tudor history period of old England.



The Tudor line prior to around 1990 was 100% all Rolex except for movement,Tudor watches are made by the same Rolex brand maker. The major difference between a Tudor and a Rolex is that Rolex contracted the manufacturing of the movement out to a 3rd party manufacturer (ETA in 95% of them).Very much like Rolex did with all there chronographs before 2000 they used ETA Valoux and Zenith movements so are they a Rolex just because they have the brand name yet movement is from ETA just like the Tudor.Now the ETA ebauche movements were made to Rolex's specifications but rotors signed Tudor. This movement was then sent to Rolex where it was assembled into a watch with all Rolex remaining parts (Rolex case, bezel, strap or bracelet,dial, crystal and crown, seals, etc.). These parts are the same parts used in the Rolex line of watches. The Tudor movements are high grade 17, 21, 25, or 26 jewel Automatic or Manual movements which when correctly cleaned, timed, and oiled, will keep time almost as well as any normal Rolex.



The case screw backs were engraved original oyster case by Rolex,on all the oyster models.In the gold or TT models Tudor uses genuine solid gold Rolex bezels and crown caps, but their bracelets are normally only gold filled,to reduce the cost while Rolex uses solid gold in their bracelets.The French Navy (among others) opted for the Tudor Submariner,instead of the Rolex Sub.

The French Navy demanded rigorous testing and tested several brands These watches were tested to carefully calibrated abusive tests in an attempt to destroy them to see how much abuse it could take before losing accuracy or malfunctioning .After testing they choose the Tudor and the only thing the French navy didn't order was the Oyster bracelet.They chose a nylon strap because it would be much more easy to change,and easily replaced if broken.And today the only step down in quality with Tudor watches in general is the price.The the main difference between a Rolex Sub and say a Tudor Sub is they used a top range Chronometer grade ETA a first class all in-house built movement but not Rolex made,and in watches like the Tudor Prince they used a light Oyster bracelet, on Subs they used the heavy Oyster bracelet.Now today the Tudor line has quite a heritage with Hans Wilsdorf the founder of Rolex and a 100% rightful place in the Rolex watch forum..

Take notes boys

[Spoonage]

Originally Posted by Stealthmode29

yes, the real thing. In my opinion they are all just submariner alternatives. I would personally invest in a patek, AP or panerai when I'm ready to add to my line up. Again, just my opinion. Of course if there is something you see in this brand then by all means enjoy. It's like buying a 3 series when you already own a 7 series. <shrug>

I would definitely buy a 3 series if I already owned a 7. You can't effectively take that 7 series around the track like you could an M3. I own both Rolex and Tudor (among other brands) and I can tell you my BBN gets more wrist time than my SubC. Different reasons for owning both. I don't baby them either.

[superdog]

Originally Posted by superdog

A watch that costs circa 3,000 $'S should never ever be referred to as a poor mans watch.

I mean....cmon....

I read the thread after my post.

Umm, really. I can sum up a few thoughts in one word: "stupid".

[bdex75]

Originally Posted by nick c

Hi bud Tudor is the real thing I own 4 and don't need to save up

Nice.

And I agree. But I only have 3 right now. Trying to locate a 75' snowflake Tudor sub.



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[sillo]

The other thing I love about Tudor is that Rolex uses it to introduce things they wouldn't of put into the Rolex line.

[eightball76]

I'm fortunate to have a few Rolexes and one Tudor BBN, currently I only wear the Tudor. I joined this great forum because I love watches, especially rolex watches. The many great posts on this forum have educated me and after seeing the Tudor Black Bay here on this forum I rushed down to the AD to try one on and BAM!!! I was hooked.
I would like to thank each and everyone of you for enlightening me to such a fantastic brand.