The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 June 2016, 01:27 AM   #1
jdlc1406
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 106
Explorer II 16570 vs Speedy Pro & small brief review

So, I just got my first Rolex, the Explorer II. Here is a little bit of commentary after owning it for a few days.

I only have one watch to compare it to, the Speedy Pro (hesalite, latest model with the big goodie box).

I had to sell the Speedy to get rid of a little debt, and also help fund the EXPII. I took a hit on it, of course, which I can get past, but I can't help but to keep comparing the two and how vastly different they are. Not better, but different. For example:

EXPII: Date feature! I like this over the Speedy Pro. I like the GMT hand. I like the band. But the Sapphire glass is really reflective. Why isn't it coated with an anti-reflective treatment? Manually winding the watch feels... Weird and gritty, almost. Very much unlike the Speedy pro which is nice and smooth. I love the fact that this watch has the screw down crown, though and is actually water tight, unlike the Speedy.

Also, the EXPII seems to be a little more difficult to read at a glance. For only four hands it does seem a little bit cluttered. It could just be the smaller size compared to the Speedy. The speedy had a SUPER clean dial that was so easy to read. However, the lume on this EXPII is AMAZING. I can read it throughout the night. All night long. In the dark. I couldn't ever do that with the Speedy. I did like the larger presence of the Speedy, but I am getting used to the smaller EXP quite nicely. This doesn't bother me anymore.

All-in-all, If I had the Speedy back, I don't see myself wearing it over the EXPII on very many ocassions. But for some reason, I do still find myself missing it. I miss hand winding. And I miss the pushers. But other than that, I am adjusting and very happy with my EXPII purchase :)

Picture since no one wants to read all that without a little visual reward.
Attached Images
 
jdlc1406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2016, 01:48 AM   #2
socialpro
"TRF" Member
 
socialpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Alex
Watch: Rolex || Panerai
Posts: 1,348
Love the explorer! Congrats on your first rolex!
socialpro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2016, 02:32 AM   #3
hoppes-no9
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: DC Metro
Posts: 327
Congrats on the Exp II. Loved your thoughts and comparisons.

I think the Speedy Pro and Exp II are both superb, and they compete with each other for the most wrist time among the ~dozen watches in my collection. And if I had to narrow it down to just two watches GASP it might just be these two that remained.

hoppes-no9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2016, 04:05 AM   #4
Wingman244
"TRF" Member
 
Wingman244's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Pacific NW, USA
Watch: Root Beer
Posts: 734
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlc1406 View Post

Also, the EXPII seems to be a little more difficult to read at a glance. For only four hands it does seem a little bit cluttered. It could just be the smaller size compared to the Speedy.
I have the Explorer II 42mm Polar - 216570. Legibility is what this reference was designed for. You could read it from across the room. Best part of this watch.
Wingman244 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2016, 04:12 AM   #5
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,840
The flat rolex sapphire is hard to read at certain angles, that is very true. However the 16570 is a fantastic, no-nonsense reference. The one to have
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2016, 06:11 AM   #6
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoppes-no9 View Post
Congrats on the Exp II. Loved your thoughts and comparisons.

I think the Speedy Pro and Exp II are both superb, and they compete with each other for the most wrist time among the ~dozen watches in my collection. And if I had to narrow it down to just two watches GASP it might just be these two that remained.

Nice pair!
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2016, 06:41 AM   #7
Watch Rob
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Chicago
Watch: 114200
Posts: 1,265
Both are great watches!
Watch Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 June 2016, 06:48 AM   #8
jdlc1406
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 106
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe100 View Post
The flat rolex sapphire is hard to read at certain angles, that is very true. However the 16570 is a fantastic, no-nonsense reference. The one to have
Yeah it is a little odd. Are these not AR coated?

It makes me wonder, because my cyclops is a little tiny bit crooked, and I also can't find the etched crown anywhere. Wondering if it was ever replaced or aftermarket. Not sure how to really know that.
jdlc1406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2016, 02:34 PM   #9
Tomas Eriksson
"TRF" Member
 
Tomas Eriksson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Stockholm
Watch: 15707CE
Posts: 2,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlc1406 View Post
Yeah it is a little odd. Are these not AR coated?



It makes me wonder, because my cyclops is a little tiny bit crooked, and I also can't find the etched crown anywhere. Wondering if it was ever replaced or aftermarket. Not sure how to really know that.


very common that the cyclops is a little of as its not easy to get them on perfectly straight. What year is your piece, Rolex didn't start with the laser etched crown until around 2002. If the piece is newer it could have gotten a replacement crystal that was oldstock, no crown doesn't have to mean it's aftermarket


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
State of the union: 5066A,15400ST,15707CE,116610LN,26470OR and a few other…
Tomas Eriksson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 June 2016, 05:30 PM   #10
amg55
"TRF" Member
 
amg55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Me
Location: Australia
Watch: Daytona 116500LN
Posts: 677
I've never had to manually wind any of the Rolex that I've owned. Why do you need to?

Nice watch, buy the way! Congratulations !
amg55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.