ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

doramas · 5 October 2016, 02:48 AM

Which do you like more? Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch vs Tudor Heritage Chrono

doramas · 5 October 2016, 02:50 AM

Enviado desde mi SM-G930F mediante Tapatalk

beshannon · 5 October 2016, 02:59 AM

The Speedmaster without any question

Furrygoat · 5 October 2016, 03:28 AM

Two very different watches.

I went with the THC personally. Black dial.

Blackdog · 5 October 2016, 03:47 AM

Price may be similar, but not even in the same league. Speedmaster Professional without question.

rollee1 · 5 October 2016, 04:26 AM

The answer lies in the watch trading market.
Speedmaster 3570.50 is classic and stunning on the wrist, can be spotted from a mile out, forever desired in the watch enthusiasts world, lots of strap options and fairly simple to service.

THC is like a pretty new crush, good watch runs accurate, they seem to be forever on sale and slower to move.
As a toy buy it cause it's fairly affordable, but as a timeless statement there's only one speedy.

cdbeaver66 · 5 October 2016, 04:59 AM

THC Grey, tried this on a few weeks ago. Feels and looks great.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

JLM3 · 5 October 2016, 05:02 AM

Speedy no doubt

bio guyver · 5 October 2016, 05:02 AM

Tudor

fania123 · 5 October 2016, 05:39 AM

and I've got both

GradyPhilpott · 5 October 2016, 05:49 AM

I went with the THC, but I yield all the glory to the Speedy Pro.

I looked at the Omega many times over the years and never sprang for it.

I looked at the black THC once and said to the AD owner, "That's my next watch."

lig · 5 October 2016, 05:56 AM

Speedy Pro. Classic.

chrisb57 · 5 October 2016, 06:01 AM

I'm sry but MOTFM every time .
Not my quote .

josephvman · 5 October 2016, 06:02 AM

I've got both and if pressed to pick a favorite I'd have to go withe the Speedy. The THC is a fantastic piece, but it doesn't have the history and iconic place in history that the Speedy has. The chunky case proportions lack the finesse of the Speedy, and no other Chrono can match the perfect symmetry and legibility, IMO. The downside to the Speedy is true water resistance, which would be a deal breaker if it were any only watch.

omitohud · 5 October 2016, 06:14 AM

U ask on a Tuesday, so it has to b a speedy.

I blame it on the autoconnect.

sickened1 · 5 October 2016, 06:23 AM

THC for me. Personally I've never been a fan of Speedy.

Thunderdan · 5 October 2016, 06:31 AM

For history, looks, and collectibility, tough to beat the Speedy.

cdbeaver66 · 5 October 2016, 06:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by omitohud

U ask on a Tuesday, so it has to b a speedy.

But it's Tudor Tuesday too

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

omitohud · 5 October 2016, 06:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cdbeaver66

But it's Tudor Tuesday too

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Lol. Pic or it didn't happen.

I blame it on the autoconnect.

DCheeta · 5 October 2016, 06:51 AM

I have always been a big fan of the Speedmaster.

bmpregler · 5 October 2016, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GradyPhilpott

I went with the THC, but I yield all the glory to the Speedy Pro.

I looked at the Omega many times over the years and never sprang for it.

I looked at the black THC once and said to the AD owner, "That's my next watch."

Same thoughts for me almost word for word, expect I bought the blue Tudor.

Bluside · 5 October 2016, 10:30 AM

I looked at both and bought the Speedmaster. No regrets.

Old Expat Beast · 5 October 2016, 10:57 AM

THC, for, among other things, the timezone bezel and the date (got to add a cyclops, though, for the added heritage look, better overall balance, and to be able to read the damn thing). Prefer the grey to the blue.

faz · 5 October 2016, 10:59 AM

Both are beautiful watches.

There are a couple of Omega watches that I like, Speedmaster being one of them, although I must say when I saw it in person, it wasn't nearly as good looking as the pictures make it look. It looked somewhat lower quality compared to Rolex.

I am just starting to warm up to Tudor, mainly after being on this forum and seeing nice things being said about them. Personally I always thought of Tudor as a watch with toy'ish look. Again, I am now starting to like the looks so no offense to those who own Tudor watches (probably on the horizon for me somewhere.)

So there, for a watch newbie like me, a Speedmaster purchase will happen way before a Tudor.

watchwatcher · 5 October 2016, 11:07 AM

I have been infatuated with the Moon watch for about as long as I've been interested in watches.

That said, I've owned both, and neither hung around. Just not me, I guess.

xjeeunitx · 5 October 2016, 11:09 AM

A Speedy is a must have for any watch enthusiast's collection. I would even say that not having one in a collection isn't a collection at all. =)

hun23 · 5 October 2016, 11:26 AM

Speedmaster between the two.

BradSomrak · 5 October 2016, 12:03 PM

Speedmaster in a landslide.

stratguy · 5 October 2016, 12:21 PM

They are both fantastic watches. Having said that, I would go with the Speedmaster. Love this pic.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DCheeta

I have always been a big fan of the Speedmaster.

JP(Canada) · 5 October 2016, 12:30 PM

I have both and they're great. The Speedmaster would be my choice if I could have just one, because I love me a manual wind movement.

View Poll Results: Tudor Chronograph vs Speedy
Tudor Heritage Chrono	34	18.28%
Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch	152	81.72%
Voters: 186. You may not vote on this poll

5 October 2016, 02:48 AM	#1
doramas Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Gran Canaria Posts: 3,469	Tudor Heritage Chrono vs Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch Which do you like more? Omega Speedmaster Professional Moonwatch vs Tudor Heritage Chrono

5 October 2016, 02:59 AM	#3
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	The Speedmaster without any question __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

5 October 2016, 04:26 AM	#6
rollee1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Real Name: Rollee Location: Boston Watch: it watching me Posts: 1,945	The answer lies in the watch trading market. Speedmaster 3570.50 is classic and stunning on the wrist, can be spotted from a mile out, forever desired in the watch enthusiasts world, lots of strap options and fairly simple to service. THC is like a pretty new crush, good watch runs accurate, they seem to be forever on sale and slower to move. As a toy buy it cause it's fairly affordable, but as a timeless statement there's only one speedy. __________________ Time you enjoy wasting was not wasted

5 October 2016, 04:59 AM	#7
cdbeaver66 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2015 Location: Surrey/W.SussexUK Posts: 1,340	THC Grey, tried this on a few weeks ago. Feels and looks great. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ 1. Breitling Colt Chronograph 2. Melbourne Watch Company Portsea 3. Tudor Black Bay ETA Blue 4.Rolex GMT Master IIc LN 5. Tudor Heritage Ranger 6. Tudor Pelagos LHD 7. Tudor Black Bay Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition 8. Tudor Black Bay GMT 9. Tudor Black Bay Harrods Instagram: mykicksandticks

5 October 2016, 02:50 AM	#2
doramas Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Gran Canaria Posts: 3,469	Enviado desde mi SM-G930F mediante Tapatalk

5 October 2016, 03:28 AM	#4
Furrygoat "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Location: Usa Posts: 428	Two very different watches. I went with the THC personally. Black dial.

5 October 2016, 03:47 AM	#5
Blackdog "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Netherlands Posts: 629	Price may be similar, but not even in the same league. Speedmaster Professional without question.

5 October 2016, 05:02 AM	#8
JLM3 Banned Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: RI Watch: blusylvx2blnrsmpbb Posts: 723	Speedy no doubt

5 October 2016, 05:02 AM	#9
bio guyver "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Kuwait Posts: 273	Tudor

5 October 2016, 05:39 AM	#10
fania123 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: PHILA Posts: 1,726	Speedy! and I've got both Attached Images

5 October 2016, 05:49 AM	#11
GradyPhilpott 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: New Mexico Watch: Seiko #SRK047 Posts: 34,460	I went with the THC, but I yield all the glory to the Speedy Pro. I looked at the Omega many times over the years and never sprang for it. I looked at the black THC once and said to the AD owner, "That's my next watch." __________________ JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner

5 October 2016, 05:56 AM	#12
lig "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: PacNW Watch: Enthusiast Posts: 2,611	Speedy Pro. Classic.

5 October 2016, 06:01 AM	#13
chrisb57 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Real Name: Chris Location: UK Watch: 114060 / 114300 Posts: 325	I'm sry but MOTFM every time . Not my quote .

5 October 2016, 06:02 AM	#14
josephvman Banned Join Date: Jul 2014 Location: Houston, TX USA Posts: 808	I've got both and if pressed to pick a favorite I'd have to go withe the Speedy. The THC is a fantastic piece, but it doesn't have the history and iconic place in history that the Speedy has. The chunky case proportions lack the finesse of the Speedy, and no other Chrono can match the perfect symmetry and legibility, IMO. The downside to the Speedy is true water resistance, which would be a deal breaker if it were any only watch.

5 October 2016, 06:14 AM	#15
omitohud "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Sam Location: los Angeles Posts: 2,051	U ask on a Tuesday, so it has to b a speedy. I blame it on the autoconnect.

5 October 2016, 06:23 AM	#16
sickened1 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2014 Real Name: Ed Location: SoCal Watch: ugiveiswatchuget Posts: 9,054	THC for me. Personally I've never been a fan of Speedy.

5 October 2016, 06:31 AM	#17
Thunderdan "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2016 Real Name: Dan Location: Bellevue, WA Posts: 10	For history, looks, and collectibility, tough to beat the Speedy.

5 October 2016, 06:51 AM	#20
DCheeta "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Dave Location: NYC Posts: 7,181	I have always been a big fan of the Speedmaster.

5 October 2016, 10:30 AM	#22
Bluside 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: Florida Posts: 3,081	I looked at both and bought the Speedmaster. No regrets.

5 October 2016, 10:57 AM	#23
Old Expat Beast TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Adam Location: Far East Watch: Golden Tuna Posts: 28,826	THC, for, among other things, the timezone bezel and the date (got to add a cyclops, though, for the added heritage look, better overall balance, and to be able to read the damn thing). Prefer the grey to the blue. Attached Images

5 October 2016, 10:59 AM	#24
faz "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2016 Real Name: Faz Location: California Watch: like'em all Posts: 4,689	Both are beautiful watches. There are a couple of Omega watches that I like, Speedmaster being one of them, although I must say when I saw it in person, it wasn't nearly as good looking as the pictures make it look. It looked somewhat lower quality compared to Rolex. I am just starting to warm up to Tudor, mainly after being on this forum and seeing nice things being said about them. Personally I always thought of Tudor as a watch with toy'ish look. Again, I am now starting to like the looks so no offense to those who own Tudor watches (probably on the horizon for me somewhere.) So there, for a watch newbie like me, a Speedmaster purchase will happen way before a Tudor. __________________ -Faz Instagram @fazmoto

5 October 2016, 11:07 AM	#25
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,047	I have been infatuated with the Moon watch for about as long as I've been interested in watches. That said, I've owned both, and neither hung around. Just not me, I guess.

5 October 2016, 11:09 AM	#26
xjeeunitx 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 5,529	A Speedy is a must have for any watch enthusiast's collection. I would even say that not having one in a collection isn't a collection at all. =)

5 October 2016, 11:26 AM	#27
hun23 Banned Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: USA Posts: 872	Speedmaster between the two.

5 October 2016, 12:03 PM	#28
BradSomrak "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2016 Real Name: Brad Location: Pittsburgh Watch: 126710BLNR Posts: 567	Speedmaster in a landslide.

5 October 2016, 12:30 PM	#30
JP(Canada) "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: Calgary, AB, CAN Posts: 795	I have both and they're great. The Speedmaster would be my choice if I could have just one, because I love me a manual wind movement. __________________ JP

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode