The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 6 December 2016, 12:49 PM   #1
ec51
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: NY
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 1,642
Icon4 Rolex policy change re: access to parts...

I've heard from a reliable CW21 source that Rolex will soon limit access to GMT, Daytona, and Oyster Quartz parts.

Has anyone else heard anything similar?

If this ends up happening, it will ultimately limit our choice to a RSC when it comes to service time.
ec51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 12:59 PM   #2
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
nope. not me.
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 01:56 PM   #3
adiorandomhero93
2024 Pledge Member
 
adiorandomhero93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Harrisburg pa
Posts: 421
I have heard this, RSC is also the only place I know of that will service a deepsea. I don't believe they will sell deepsea parts to independents
adiorandomhero93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 02:01 PM   #4
japenney
"TRF" Member
 
japenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
Quote:
Originally Posted by adiorandomhero93 View Post
I have heard this, RSC is also the only place I know of that will service a deepsea. I don't believe they will sell deepsea parts to independents
Mainly because nobody else has the equipment to pressure test the DSSD?
japenney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 02:01 PM   #5
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
In Australia this has been the case for years


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 02:08 PM   #6
adiorandomhero93
2024 Pledge Member
 
adiorandomhero93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Harrisburg pa
Posts: 421
Quote:
Originally Posted by japenney View Post
Mainly because nobody else has the equipment to pressure test the DSSD?
Yes that is what I have been told. I know that with most independents I have talked to they must send worn parts to rolex for exchange before rolex will send them a replacement part. I wonder though if rolex asks what ref. number they need parts for when it comes to something like a balance staff for the 3135?
adiorandomhero93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 02:14 PM   #7
Alcan
2024 Pledge Member
 
Alcan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
Rolex Canada's policy is pretty simple. They will service any Rolex they still have parts for unless it has what they deem an exotic dial (ie. one that can't be replaced if it gets scratched or damaged during service).

They overhauled this circa 1960 cocktail watch for Nancy about 5 years ago:
Attached Images
 
__________________
Member #1,315

I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution!
Alcan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 02:20 PM   #8
amg55
"TRF" Member
 
amg55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Me
Location: Australia
Watch: Daytona 116500LN
Posts: 677
Quote:
Originally Posted by crowncollection View Post
In Australia this has been the case for years


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes, this is indeed true. This trend will soon follow across the globe. A lot of small, independent watch makers are very peeved about it but what can you do? The argument is that only Rolex and the likes know how to fix their own watches, with their in-house tools and expertise. Personally, I think it's bullocks. It's just another way these companies can make more money out of service and parts.
amg55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 05:09 PM   #9
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by amg55 View Post
Yes, this is indeed true. This trend will soon follow across the globe. A lot of small, independent watch makers are very peeved about it but what can you do? The argument is that only Rolex and the likes know how to fix their own watches, with their in-house tools and expertise. Personally, I think it's bullocks. It's just another way these companies can make more money out of service and parts.


Agree it is a bs policy to ensure a monopoly on movement servicing



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 08:36 PM   #10
Mick P
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
Chaps

Put yourself in Rolexes shoes.

They have the right to control the parts they use and by restricting the distribution of those parts, they control the standard of repairs.

It's all about protecting the brand and also offers more protection to the buyers of a pre owned Rolex.

Regards

Mick
Mick P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 08:46 PM   #11
superstarmar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: In Motion
Watch: my wrist presence
Posts: 7,436
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick P View Post
Chaps

Put yourself in Rolexes shoes.

They have the right to control the parts they use and by restricting the distribution of those parts, they control the standard of repairs.

It's all about protecting the brand and also offers more protection to the buyers of a pre owned Rolex.

Regards

Mick
Good point Mick!!!

Fortunately for me my local AD has an in house
Rolex trained and authorized watchmaker so I don't
have to deal with RSC...
superstarmar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 09:01 PM   #12
GreatCircle
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: European Union
Posts: 588
Greymarket prices of most wanted pieces like inserts and (WG) Daytona dials will go to the moon probably.....
GreatCircle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 09:02 PM   #13
mailman
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
 
mailman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick P View Post
Chaps

Put yourself in Rolexes shoes.

They have the right to control the parts they use and by restricting the distribution of those parts, they control the standard of repairs.

It's all about protecting the brand and also offers more protection to the buyers of a pre owned Rolex.

Regards

Mick
The standard of repair I receive from my independent with a Rolex parts account to me is higher than a RSC. Why? Direct communication with someone who actually cares about what they're doing. Less chance of it gong back because of error. They're accountable to someone other than a big corporation. If I ever buy a vintage watch, forget RSC over here. Plus Rolex We've all heard good and bad with RSC here in the states. Unless it's warranty work or if I have a broken ceramic insert I'll stick with what works for me.
__________________
JJ
mailman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 09:08 PM   #14
amg55
"TRF" Member
 
amg55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Me
Location: Australia
Watch: Daytona 116500LN
Posts: 677
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick P View Post
Chaps

Put yourself in Rolexes shoes.

They have the right to control the parts they use and by restricting the distribution of those parts, they control the standard of repairs.

It's all about protecting the brand and also offers more protection to the buyers of a pre owned Rolex.

Regards

Mick
It's a fair point you made. However, it's the excuse that they give that bugs me. it'd be like saying a good local mechanic can't change an brake pads because the cars are that specialised that they just don't have the skills to do so.
amg55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 09:24 PM   #15
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
Hmm 7 months ago I purchased a DSSD sapphire no problem so this would be news to me.
Muzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 December 2016, 11:01 PM   #16
Gold Crown
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Ross
Location: Chicago Area
Watch: 6265 18K Daytona
Posts: 928
Any Chinese Watch factory can churn out 1000s of Rolex pal parts a day, just like they have with Valjoux and ETA parts. Not to worry. Parts will be available and Rolex will be the losers.
Gold Crown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2016, 12:47 AM   #17
cornerstore
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by japenney View Post
Mainly because nobody else has the equipment to pressure test the DSSD?
Not necessarily true. Steve Cotton on Vancouver Island worked on the DSSD development with James Cameron and Rolex. He is one of only a few independent RSC authorised repair shops. He may have the equipment to pressure test one. http://www.precisionmicromachining.c...president.html

My Rolex trained watch maker and the other independents here were cut off buying replacement parts by Rolex a number of years ago. The one above is the only independent I' m aware of that still exists in BC .
cornerstore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2016, 06:28 AM   #18
Rikki
TechXpert
 
Rikki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rik Dietel
Location: Seminole Fla
Watch: 5512 s/s Sub
Posts: 1,818
Well according to the law if you sell a product here you have to supply parts to repair it up to eight years it used to be 50 years but in 1986 the law was changed to 8 and that day we became a throwaway society. All to keep the economy of consumerism alive.
__________________
Century 21 Certified watchmaker
Omega Service Provider Trained
Omega OWME Certified.
Rolex Parts Account Holder.
Rikki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2016, 08:13 AM   #19
ec51
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: NY
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 1,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mick P View Post
Chaps

Put yourself in Rolexes shoes.

They have the right to control the parts they use and by restricting the distribution of those parts, they control the standard of repairs.

It's all about protecting the brand and also offers more protection to the buyers of a pre owned Rolex.

Regards

Mick
Fine point, but then why have "Rolex certified" watchmakers?

It's obvious a CW21 would have the necessary skills - but then again, I'm not quite sure that's the reason Rolex is changing its policy.

It's all about the money.
ec51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2016, 08:31 AM   #20
amg55
"TRF" Member
 
amg55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Me
Location: Australia
Watch: Daytona 116500LN
Posts: 677
Quote:
Originally Posted by ec51 View Post
It's all about the money.
Bingo!

Btw, one of the watchmaker, whose blog I subscribe to, did mention that they will still be able to access parts from their network around the world, mostly for older models. It just makes their lives so much harder and unnecessarily more expensive. Their fear is that their job will eventually dwindle down to just changing batteries.

Speaking of batteries, one of the watchmaker in town that I got to know quite well was telling me that 10 or so years ago, he used to be a Tag reseller. That privilege has been since taken away from him because Tag wants to 'control' their sales, service and repairs. However, what's funny is that the local Tag AD actually sends their watches to him to have batteries replaced and pressure tested. He charges around A$50 for his service but Tag whacks on another couple of hundreds because it's deemed to have been serviced by an authorised service centre! I find that rather unethical.
amg55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 December 2016, 08:47 AM   #21
ronricks
2024 Pledge Member
 
ronricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ATL
Watch: 126610LV
Posts: 2,752
I thought it was already hard for most Independents to get Oysterquartz parts?
ronricks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2016, 12:59 AM   #22
ec51
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: NY
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 1,642
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronricks View Post
I thought it was already hard for most Independents to get Oysterquartz parts?
Could be true - though this was the first I was hearing about US independents possibly losing access to GMT and Daytona parts.
ec51 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 December 2016, 01:07 AM   #23
RW16610
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
RW16610's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Rommel
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 9,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gold Crown View Post
Any Chinese Watch factory can churn out 1000s of Rolex pal parts a day, just like they have with Valjoux and ETA parts. Not to worry. Parts will be available and Rolex will be the losers.
Maybe so but at least for me it wouldn't feel right doing this to my watch.
RW16610 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.