ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 February 2017, 08:32 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 458
|
New or Used - Opinions Welcomed
Hi all
I am very close to purchasing my first (long and eagerly awaited) Rolex. After lots of soul searching/mind changing and general indecision as to which beauty will be the first (hopefully of many) I decided to stick with a classic and go for the Sub Date Ceramic 116610LN. Now that's sorted, the next big 'dilemma' is new or used? My thoughts are that there doesn't really appear to be enough price difference (in the UK at least) between a watch that is say 3 years old and a brand new one. In the UK, the list for the 116610LN is £6,250 Used prices for a private sale can be as high as £5900 which I cant really justify paying, purely because for just a few hundred £'s more I can have a brand new one. Dealer prices on the other hand for used items can either be the same as, or actually higher than list! Obviously I would never pay more than list for a second hand watch, but don't fancy waiting another 4 to 6 months either which is the current average time I've been quoted by a couple of Rolex AD's. Just wondered what the forums view is generally on pre owned vs new and would welcome feedback on the pro's & cons of both. Regards Max |
17 February 2017, 08:39 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
|
If the price differential isn't that much, I would go new.
|
17 February 2017, 08:43 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Basil
Location: Athens, GR
Watch: BoctokKomandirskie
Posts: 2,881
|
Unless shopping for a discounted model, I prefer to be the original owner.
Especially if the difference is a couple hundred quid...
__________________
2FA Enabled |
17 February 2017, 08:43 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
|
New. Less hassle too. And your name on the card.
__________________
16710 Pepsi | 16570 Polar | 214270 MK2 | PAM00176 | 145.022 Speedy |
17 February 2017, 08:45 AM | #5 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
When I bought mine a few years ago I got 20% off for a mint one so now it's only worth getting new, try ringing around a few ADs, should be one around.
|
17 February 2017, 08:54 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: the tide roll in..
Posts: 1,138
|
For your first, I would go new from an AD.
|
17 February 2017, 08:58 AM | #7 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
|
My rule of thumb is to go to the AD if the price is within $500. In your situation, I think the AD is the better option. The AD offers the lowest resistance, least hassles, fewest worries option.
Looking forward to the incoming. |
17 February 2017, 09:00 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
|
Choices
The price differential new/used for a SubC locally (Atlanta, Ga) isn't enough for me to warrant going with a used model. I'd rather pay more and get an absolutely new watch.
I got close to buying a used SubC and had a knowledgeable friend look at it. She found a tiny crack in the bezel and a few other flaws. This watch was from a reputable dealer and described as "like new". It's just too much money to get bamboozled. |
17 February 2017, 09:04 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
New. No brainer.
|
17 February 2017, 09:11 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
|
new.
|
17 February 2017, 09:46 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy EU
Watch: Rolex Panerai
Posts: 7,504
|
New , without hesitation
|
17 February 2017, 09:48 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Edward
Location: USA
Posts: 858
|
New and never look back.
|
17 February 2017, 09:49 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: OC
Posts: 1,466
|
New, unless preowned is mint and more than a few hundred difference
|
17 February 2017, 09:53 AM | #14 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
|
Always new for me.
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
17 February 2017, 09:55 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
|
For that price difference go new. I go either way just depends on the model, availability and cost difference.
Plus if it is your first it is good to go new. |
17 February 2017, 10:02 AM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Bill
Location: Baltimore, MD
Watch: 116600 SD4K
Posts: 3,283
|
The savings in this case don't sound like they're worth the hassle. I'd go new and fresh from AD.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
17 February 2017, 10:42 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Alan
Location: NoVA
Watch: 42mm Polar Exp II
Posts: 333
|
For that little of a difference, new without hesitation. I think I would need to save at least 1k to deal with potential hassle and pay for a service if need be.
__________________
Rolex 326934 White Omega Speedmaster GSOTM Meteorite PAM 1314 IWC 3777-01 JLC Reverso Grand Taille |
17 February 2017, 10:44 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
|
New when possible if not a large price difference or if keeping for sure.
|
17 February 2017, 10:46 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: CO, USA
Watch: Made in Suisse
Posts: 444
|
Well the question is either new in 4-6 months or used right now for about the same price. It's a tough decision when you've made up your mind about the model and are already picturing it on your wrist.
|
17 February 2017, 10:47 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Faz
Location: California
Watch: like'em all
Posts: 4,689
|
For the first Rolex, definitely new.
If you can buy from a trusted seller, you will save some $$$, so if it doesn't bother you, go that route.
__________________
-Faz Instagram @fazmoto |
17 February 2017, 11:07 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex 116610LV
Posts: 2,270
|
Congrats on making your Rolex choice! The Subc Date is an excellent choice indeed!
Definitely go with new and shop different AD's to see if there is any pricing wiggle room. Generally if you hit it off with a salesperson, they will certainly try to accommodate you. New is worry free with a clean history and full 5 year warranty and up to 10 year service interval, plus the more strigent +/- 2 sec/day accuracy (green Surperlative Chronometer seal hangtag, see attached link for more in depth discussion). http://www.ablogtowatch.com/rolex-ex...n-house-tests/ Good Luck in your first Rolex purchase! Make sure you post some pics. Cheers! |
17 February 2017, 11:11 AM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: Always!
Posts: 557
|
If the price difference is not that significant, I recommend you purchase it new!
|
17 February 2017, 12:21 PM | #23 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 670
|
Quote:
|
|
17 February 2017, 12:35 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Kentucky
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 49
|
Find a good AD who will give you a good price, and get a brand new one with your name on the card. It will feel more special to you that way.
|
17 February 2017, 12:37 PM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: NYC
Watch: 5970
Posts: 1,980
|
New!!!
|
17 February 2017, 02:28 PM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
|
|
17 February 2017, 02:39 PM | #27 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,332
|
New is a no-brainer in this case. The price difference is not enough. And taking a 2-3 year reduction in the warranty is not worth it. Wait for a new one. It may not be that long. The AD may be telling you this so he can move a used one now, not a new one later.
|
17 February 2017, 03:04 PM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,227
|
My first Rolex was new and from AD and it was definitely an unforgettable experience. My second one I just picked up used and to be honest, I would do it again. Saved myself $600 for not getting to pull the plastic pieces off myself.
First piece def new but the ones after that, used is fine as long as it's from a trusted seller and in mint condition. |
17 February 2017, 04:43 PM | #29 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 458
|
Quote:
|
|
17 February 2017, 04:46 PM | #30 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 458
|
My 673 - well spotted!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.