The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 February 2017, 08:32 AM   #1
Punchthefatkid
"TRF" Member
 
Punchthefatkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 458
New or Used - Opinions Welcomed

Hi all

I am very close to purchasing my first (long and eagerly awaited) Rolex.

After lots of soul searching/mind changing and general indecision as to which beauty will be the first (hopefully of many) I decided to stick with a classic and go for the Sub Date Ceramic 116610LN.

Now that's sorted, the next big 'dilemma' is new or used?

My thoughts are that there doesn't really appear to be enough price difference (in the UK at least) between a watch that is say 3 years old and a brand new one.

In the UK, the list for the 116610LN is £6,250

Used prices for a private sale can be as high as £5900 which I cant really justify paying, purely because for just a few hundred £'s more I can have a brand new one.

Dealer prices on the other hand for used items can either be the same as, or actually higher than list!

Obviously I would never pay more than list for a second hand watch, but don't fancy waiting another 4 to 6 months either which is the current average time I've been quoted by a couple of Rolex AD's.

Just wondered what the forums view is generally on pre owned vs new and would welcome feedback on the pro's & cons of both.

Regards

Max
Punchthefatkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 08:39 AM   #2
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
If the price differential isn't that much, I would go new.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 08:43 AM   #3
minute_man
2024 Pledge Member
 
minute_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Basil
Location: Athens, GR
Watch: BoctokKomandirskie
Posts: 2,881
Unless shopping for a discounted model, I prefer to be the original owner.
Especially if the difference is a couple hundred quid...
__________________
2FA Enabled
minute_man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 08:43 AM   #4
DramaTurtle
"TRF" Member
 
DramaTurtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Alex
Location: Niagara Falls
Watch: Polar Explorer
Posts: 1,533
New. Less hassle too. And your name on the card.
__________________
16710 Pepsi | 16570 Polar | 214270 MK2 | PAM00176 | 145.022 Speedy
Quote:
Originally Posted by BDL View Post
Rolex moved to its furthest point of being a tool watch. The new Sea-Dweller and Meteorite GMT seem best suited for raising PGA trophies, and that might be the closest we get to one anyway.
DramaTurtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 08:45 AM   #5
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
When I bought mine a few years ago I got 20% off for a mint one so now it's only worth getting new, try ringing around a few ADs, should be one around.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 08:54 AM   #6
natosub
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: USA
Watch: the tide roll in..
Posts: 1,138
For your first, I would go new from an AD.
natosub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 08:58 AM   #7
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
My rule of thumb is to go to the AD if the price is within $500. In your situation, I think the AD is the better option. The AD offers the lowest resistance, least hassles, fewest worries option.

Looking forward to the incoming.
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 09:00 AM   #8
Quailhunter
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Doug
Location: Georgia USA
Watch: Rolex President
Posts: 1,348
Choices

The price differential new/used for a SubC locally (Atlanta, Ga) isn't enough for me to warrant going with a used model. I'd rather pay more and get an absolutely new watch.

I got close to buying a used SubC and had a knowledgeable friend look at it. She found a tiny crack in the bezel and a few other flaws. This watch was from a reputable dealer and described as "like new".

It's just too much money to get bamboozled.
Quailhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 09:04 AM   #9
FTX I
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
New. No brainer.
FTX I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 09:11 AM   #10
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
new.
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 09:46 AM   #11
Gerry62
"TRF" Member
 
Gerry62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Italy EU
Watch: Rolex Panerai
Posts: 7,504
New , without hesitation
Gerry62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 09:48 AM   #12
the_natural
"TRF" Member
 
the_natural's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Edward
Location: USA
Posts: 858
New and never look back.
the_natural is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 09:49 AM   #13
armen34
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: OC
Posts: 1,466
New, unless preowned is mint and more than a few hundred difference
armen34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 09:53 AM   #14
HL65
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
HL65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 64,006
Always new for me.
__________________

SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT
HL65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 09:55 AM   #15
droptopman
"TRF" Member
 
droptopman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
For that price difference go new. I go either way just depends on the model, availability and cost difference.

Plus if it is your first it is good to go new.
droptopman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 10:02 AM   #16
MickCollins1916
2024 Pledge Member
 
MickCollins1916's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Bill
Location: Baltimore, MD
Watch: 116600 SD4K
Posts: 3,283
The savings in this case don't sound like they're worth the hassle. I'd go new and fresh from AD.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MickCollins1916 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 10:42 AM   #17
slowturbo
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Real Name: Alan
Location: NoVA
Watch: 42mm Polar Exp II
Posts: 333
For that little of a difference, new without hesitation. I think I would need to save at least 1k to deal with potential hassle and pay for a service if need be.
__________________
Rolex 326934 White
Omega Speedmaster GSOTM Meteorite
PAM 1314
IWC 3777-01
JLC Reverso Grand Taille
slowturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 10:44 AM   #18
japenney
"TRF" Member
 
japenney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Real Name: Josh
Location: Canada
Watch: undecided
Posts: 4,777
New when possible if not a large price difference or if keeping for sure.
japenney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 10:46 AM   #19
rjstuf001
"TRF" Member
 
rjstuf001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: CO, USA
Watch: Made in Suisse
Posts: 444
Well the question is either new in 4-6 months or used right now for about the same price. It's a tough decision when you've made up your mind about the model and are already picturing it on your wrist.
rjstuf001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 10:47 AM   #20
faz
"TRF" Member
 
faz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Real Name: Faz
Location: California
Watch: like'em all
Posts: 4,689
For the first Rolex, definitely new.

If you can buy from a trusted seller, you will save some $$$, so if it doesn't bother you, go that route.
__________________
-Faz

Instagram @fazmoto
faz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 11:07 AM   #21
TickTockChuck
"TRF" Member
 
TickTockChuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Chuck
Location: Canada
Watch: Rolex 116610LV
Posts: 2,270
Congrats on making your Rolex choice! The Subc Date is an excellent choice indeed!

Definitely go with new and shop different AD's to see if there is any pricing wiggle room. Generally if you hit it off with a salesperson, they will certainly try to accommodate you.

New is worry free with a clean history and full 5 year warranty and up to 10 year service interval, plus the more strigent +/- 2 sec/day accuracy (green Surperlative Chronometer seal hangtag, see attached link for more in depth discussion).

http://www.ablogtowatch.com/rolex-ex...n-house-tests/

Good Luck in your first Rolex purchase! Make sure you post some pics. Cheers!
TickTockChuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 11:11 AM   #22
UnicoJG
"TRF" Member
 
UnicoJG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: Always!
Posts: 557
If the price difference is not that significant, I recommend you purchase it new!
UnicoJG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 12:21 PM   #23
T4ME
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quailhunter View Post
The price differential new/used for a SubC locally (Atlanta, Ga) isn't enough for me to warrant going with a used model. I'd rather pay more and get an absolutely new watch.

I got close to buying a used SubC and had a knowledgeable friend look at it. She found a tiny crack in the bezel and a few other flaws. This watch was from a reputable dealer and described as "like new".

It's just too much money to get bamboozled.
Bamboozled is the key word. Go new
T4ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 12:35 PM   #24
BadgerHawk
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Kentucky
Watch: BLNR
Posts: 49
Find a good AD who will give you a good price, and get a brand new one with your name on the card. It will feel more special to you that way.
BadgerHawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 12:37 PM   #25
toucan
"TRF" Member
 
toucan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: NYC
Watch: 5970
Posts: 1,980
New!!!
toucan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 02:28 PM   #26
Ryuden
"TRF" Member
 
Ryuden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Miki
Location: SG
Posts: 1,575
Icon6

Quote:
Originally Posted by Punchthefatkid View Post
...I cant really justify paying, purely because for just a few hundred £'s more I can have a brand new one...

You already made up your mind, go new...

Sidetrack, nice avatar. Is that a 587 or 673?

Ryuden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 02:39 PM   #27
Rocket_Man
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 1,332
New is a no-brainer in this case. The price difference is not enough. And taking a 2-3 year reduction in the warranty is not worth it. Wait for a new one. It may not be that long. The AD may be telling you this so he can move a used one now, not a new one later.
Rocket_Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 03:04 PM   #28
nikesupremedunk
"TRF" Member
 
nikesupremedunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,227
My first Rolex was new and from AD and it was definitely an unforgettable experience. My second one I just picked up used and to be honest, I would do it again. Saved myself $600 for not getting to pull the plastic pieces off myself.

First piece def new but the ones after that, used is fine as long as it's from a trusted seller and in mint condition.
nikesupremedunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 04:43 PM   #29
Punchthefatkid
"TRF" Member
 
Punchthefatkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 458
Quote:
Originally Posted by TickTockChuck View Post
Congrats on making your Rolex choice! The Subc Date is an excellent choice indeed!

Definitely go with new and shop different AD's to see if there is any pricing wiggle room. Generally if you hit it off with a salesperson, they will certainly try to accommodate you.

New is worry free with a clean history and full 5 year warranty and up to 10 year service interval, plus the more strigent +/- 2 sec/day accuracy (green Surperlative Chronometer seal hangtag, see attached link for more in depth discussion).

http://www.ablogtowatch.com/rolex-ex...n-house-tests/

Good Luck in your first Rolex purchase! Make sure you post some pics. Cheers!
Thanks for the comments and additional info- appreciated
Punchthefatkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 February 2017, 04:46 PM   #30
Punchthefatkid
"TRF" Member
 
Punchthefatkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Sheffield England
Posts: 458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryuden View Post
You already made up your mind, go new...

Sidetrack, nice avatar. Is that a 587 or 673?

My 673 - well spotted!
Attached Images
 
Punchthefatkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.