The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 June 2017, 03:10 PM   #1
gtnator
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
gtnator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: DSSD, SD43, Pepsi,
Posts: 2,084
New Sea Dweller 43 redundant with DSSD?

How many CURRENT owners owners of the DSSD are planning on purchasing a new Sea Dweller 50th Anniversary?

I'm one, but am curious as to how many of you current DSSD owners will take the plunge?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
gtnator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2017, 08:35 PM   #2
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
I would imagine quite a few as the bracelet width and reduced thickness would be a welcome.
Muzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2017, 08:41 PM   #3
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
To me its closer to a sub c than a dssd in terms of redundancy.
Would i have both? No. But i would have a new SD and a DSSD before i would have a sub c and a new SD
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2017, 08:49 PM   #4
Mick P
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
You could argue that any second watch is unnecessary but if you want it, just buy it.

Regards

Mick
Mick P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2017, 08:58 PM   #5
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,135
I did. The SD43 wears much smaller than the DBlue and both can coexist

They are two very different watches and love them both.
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2017, 09:25 PM   #6
maton12
"TRF" Member
 
maton12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sydney
Posts: 400
One is Rolex's alpha diving watch and the other is a larger Sub

Would keep DSSD or sell and get SD50, but not keep both
maton12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2017, 09:40 PM   #7
SnapperJohn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 33
I swapped from a SubC Date to the DSSD just a few weeks ago. So far I am very happy with how it wears, in fact I am delighted, and once on the wrist (properly fitted) you don't notice the extra weight. I've not really had any issues with cuffs fitting on my shirts either. I haven't seen the SD43 yet but from the photographs I've seen I don't like the cyclops. I must admit it is harder to see the date on my DSSD than it was with my SubC Date but I love the cleaner lines of the DSSD.
SnapperJohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2017, 09:58 PM   #8
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,801
In the Submariner/Sea-Dweller line up I would only have one Submariner. The ND, Date or the Hulk. In the DSSD it would either be the DSSD-Blue or the SD43. I like the dials but everything does not need to be black. I currently own the Hulk and am waiting on the SD43. I have owned two DSSD in the past and before the release of the SD43 I had been considering the DSSD-Blue, but no more. Going to see how the SD43 works with the Hulk.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2017, 10:29 PM   #9
Toivonen
"TRF" Member
 
Toivonen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Vittorio
Location: Italy
Watch: SeaDweller Deepsea
Posts: 1,001
Quote:
Originally Posted by maton12 View Post
One is Rolex's alpha diving watch and the other is a larger Sub

Would keep DSSD or sell and get SD50, but not keep both
__________________
No HEV? No Party!!!
If you LOVE the Sea Dweller... Join the "BDV"
https://www.instagram.com/bandadellavalvola/
https://www.facebook.com/bandadellavalvola/
http://orologi.forumfree.it/?t=75294392
Toivonen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2017, 10:45 PM   #10
Camel
"TRF" Member
 
Camel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Willem
Location: Pretoria RSA
Watch: ROLEXROLEXROLEX
Posts: 1,072
I would keep both my Subs (5 and 6 digit), my DSSD, my D-Blue and get a SD43. They are all unique in their own way.
__________________
Rolex Datejust II WG/SS Blue 116334 "8368xxxx"
Rolex Sea-Dweller SD43 126600 "94A6xxxx"
Rolex Deepsea Sea-Dweller 116660 "V84xxxx"
Rolex Deepsea D-Blue Horizon 116660 "3170xxxx"
Rolex Explorer II Polar 16570 "T20xxxx"
Rolex Explorer II Black 216570 "G53xxxx"
Rolex GMT-Master II 16710 "P32xxxx"
Rolex GMT-Master II Ceramic 116710LN "V97xxxx"
Rolex Submariner 16610 "Z61xxxx"
Rolex Submariner Ceramic 116610LN "G79xxxx"
Camel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 12:14 AM   #11
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtnator View Post
How many CURRENT owners owners of the DSSD are planning on purchasing a new Sea Dweller 50th Anniversary?

I'm one, but am curious as to how many of you current DSSD owners will take the plunge?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'm not sure, but I may be biased.
The SD43 is a very nice watch indeed and I always wanted a Red Sub but at the end of the day, it's very close to the DSSD in dimensions.
The thickness issue is insignificant as we are really only talking about what? Less than couple of MM in total????
In contrast the DSSD will always sit flatter on the wrist regardless of wrist shape as the Case-back protrudes less and it's relationship to the drop of at the bottom of the lugs is maybe just a little better on the DSSD.

I will always respect the fact that the DSSD is virtually a 100% technical exercise and form follows function.
I recall reading somewhere that without the Ringlock system it would've been another 2 mm thicker.

In contrast the SD43 is virtually a 100% styling exercise.

I suppose if Rolex hadn't released the D-blue I would definitely have added the SD43 to my humble collection to spice it up a bit.
But seeing as I am fortunate to have the D-blue which is much more stunning in the flesh than the SD43 I think I may as well pass on it as it won't add anything to my collection. It's really redundant to me.
I also prefer the curved Crystal.

I think I've just answered the question that's been churning through my own mind here
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 12:58 AM   #12
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,055
I guess it depends on your overall collection and what's in it...

I don't know if I have room for two sea dwellers. Understand there's significant differences in the two and I appreciate each for its own merits, but...just don't know if I could make that work.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 01:32 AM   #13
khunpepe
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Thailand
Posts: 41

I will get it to complete my sd collections


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
khunpepe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 01:43 AM   #14
ttomczak
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
ttomczak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Thomas
Location: North Carolina
Watch: The Beach
Posts: 3,434
SD43 wears smaller than a DSSD... Correct that it can be construed to be an oversized Sub, but until Rolex "fixes" the band on the DSSD to be more proportional, it will always be top heavy...
__________________

If you wind it, it tells pretty good time
(Paul Newman)
ttomczak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 03:49 AM   #15
Tebow15
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,143
I have a deep blue DSSD and a SD43. is there such a thing as having too many Rolex??
Tebow15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 03:56 AM   #16
Dirt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Brisbane
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 8,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tebow15 View Post
I have a deep blue DSSD and a SD43. is there such a thing as having too many Rolex??
Yes.
Especially when you have them sitting around and not wearing them.
Servicing/repairing them can also be problematic
Dirt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 03:58 AM   #17
Tebow15
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirt View Post
Yes.

Especially when you have them sitting around and not wearing them.

Servicing/repairing them can also be problematic


I disagree. Complaining about having too many Rolex is like complaining about having too much money or beautiful women. Cry me a river.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tebow15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 04:01 AM   #18
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,517
For me would be how many black divers do I have. It's a color issue with me. Mix up the colors and I am all in.
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 04:01 AM   #19
Tebow15
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
For me would be how many black divers do I have. It's a color issue with me. Mix up the colors and I am all in.






Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tebow15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 04:51 AM   #20
SnapperJohn
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Scotland
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tebow15 View Post




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Now THAT is a nice collection - enjoy wearing them.
SnapperJohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 05:14 AM   #21
Mystro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Mystro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,517
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tebow15 View Post




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thats what I am talking about.....
__________________
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hyitq0aikqgajc0/Time%20sig.jpg?raw=1[/img]
Mystro is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 07:05 AM   #22
bombtech1999
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Alabama
Posts: 101
Cyclops kills it for me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'm out!!
bombtech1999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 07:10 AM   #23
jbsmith
"TRF" Member
 
jbsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Blake
Location: US
Watch: Daytonas
Posts: 1,869
Me personally, I can't justify both. I prefer to keep my D Blue for the dial, no Cyclops, and king of depth rating.
jbsmith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 07:11 AM   #24
Tebow15
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystro View Post
Thats what I am talking about.....


Thanks


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tebow15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 07:39 AM   #25
Tebow15
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,143
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnapperJohn View Post
Now THAT is a nice collection - enjoy wearing them.


Thank you.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Tebow15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 09:58 AM   #26
Kevin Hammer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: PA/NYC
Posts: 94
Have DeepSea, and No Date. Waiting to see SD43 to decide if it will overtake either or both of those two.
Kevin Hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 11:38 AM   #27
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
D-Blue and SD43 are significantly different to mine eye, the DSSD and SD43 would be too similar to own both.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 11:45 AM   #28
JasonKrick
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Canada
Posts: 146
'If' I could only have a DSSD or a SD43? And not both, why limit yourself etc.

It would be the DSSD.

While the SD43 has retained is depth rating. It is a mystery to me why a company as conservative as Rolex would change so much on an iconic watch.

The SD43 seems lost. Does it want to be a Sub with its cyclops. Or does it want to be a DeepSea with its almost identical width.

Aesthically, I think the SD43 is very attractive. For me, it is no longer a true SeaDweller.

A similar situation is: Mercedes is changing up their G wagon after 40 years. To the overwhelming majority of G owners. The new G will not be a real G.
JasonKrick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 12:02 PM   #29
KBM
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
Speaking as a dive watch nut, absolutely not. Very different watches, which can easily coexist in a collection.
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 June 2017, 02:37 PM   #30
rominvicta
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: May 2017
Location: EU
Watch: DSSD, BLNR, SM, GM
Posts: 933
Quite different in many aspects. So if pocket wise you are deep enough then go for both. I already did so.
rominvicta is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.