Professional Rolex for small wrist

[atsauveur]

I've been contemplating getting my first Rolex, but my wrist size makes getting a Professional model difficult (I'm not interested in dress models at the moment). Dial size is not so important--it's lug to lug width that makes my search an arduous one. For example, the Sub C and the new 39mm Explorer I are both just a bit too long (lug-wise) for me, as one lug invariably hangs just a bit beyond the edge of my wrist.

So far I've found the SD 4000 (116600) and the 36mm Explorer I as viable options. Are there any other sports Rolex that would have a shorter lug height than what I have already tried?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[blah114]

Originally Posted by atsauveur

I've been contemplating getting my first Rolex, but my wrist size makes getting a Professional model difficult (I'm not interested in dress models at the moment). Dial size is not so important--it's lug to lug width that makes my search an arduous one. For example, the Sub C and the new 39mm Explorer I are both just a bit too long (lug-wise) for me, as one lug invariably hands just a bit beyond where my wrist ends.

So far I've found the SD 4000 (116600) and the 36mm Explorer I as viable options. Are there any other sports Rolex that would have a shorter luv height than what I have already tried?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The 36 mm Rolex explorer 1.perfectionl if 36 mm is too large, which I doubt, then a 34 mm air king, vintage. I own both. The 36 mm explorer is spectacular.
Both are reasonably priced too. Go for the explorer 1. On 6.25” wrists, it’s perfect.

[AF_Rob]

the 36mm Explorer is nice. I also like the new OP models. They should fit you quite nice.

[logantrky]

The Exp I would be my pick out of the choices you presented. Have you ever considered the 36mm OP? I guess it would be considered a professional model... Plus, a lot of great history! Just a thought.

[blah114]

On my wrist..

[cassin907]

not sure if the Oyster Perpetual is "professional" or not but it's a fine choice in 36mm or -- perhaps better -- 34mm

if you want to go outside of Rolex, the Tudor Black Bay 36 is nice. So too is the Rado "Captain Cook" dive watch

[Thuilln]

I have both the 36mm Explorer and a 34mm Air King and they're both very nice and suit small wrists well. The only drawback with the Air King is the legibility : it really is poor sometimes. For this reason I'd go for an Explorer.

[RolexDad]

Not many options when going small and sporty--I got the 36mm Explorer I. Comfortable and smaller, but the dial and hands really give it a sufficiently masculine look IMO

[Beckster]

My wrists unfortunately are as small as they come, but most of the 40 mm are still good. Esp the older 5 digit models like 14060, 16710...




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[joli160]

OP, why care if only one lug is hanging a bit beyond your wrist ?
Some fashion police stating it should not ?
I don't think it matters and just go with the model you like and not limit yourself to only 34/ 36 models.
After a day of wearing almost any watch feels comfortable.

[SpyShops718]

Originally Posted by RolexDad

Not many options when going small and sporty--I got the 36mm Explorer I. Comfortable and smaller, but the dial and hands really give it a sufficiently masculine look IMO

Very nice....
You can wear it with any kind of attire.

[NLYogi]

Originally Posted by joli160

OP, why care if only one lug is hanging a bit beyond your wrist ?
Some fashion police stating it should not ?
I don't think it matters and just go with the model you like and not limit yourself to only 34/ 36 models.
After a day of wearing almost any watch feels comfortable.

Makes sense!

[blah114]

Originally Posted by RolexDad

Not many options when going small and sporty--I got the 36mm Explorer I. Comfortable and smaller, but the dial and hands really give it a sufficiently masculine look IMO

This looks greats. My explorer is all scratched. Was this ever polished... it looks amazing.

[Giangos]

Originally Posted by RolexDad

Not many options when going small and sporty--I got the 36mm Explorer I. Comfortable and smaller, but the dial and hands really give it a sufficiently masculine look IMO

Perfect!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[fskywalker]

What about a 36mm Oyster Perpetual? My 116000 below on oyster and super jubilee bracelets








Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[brandrea]

Go vintage 4 or 5 digit Submariner

[The Libertine]

Try either the 14060 or 16710 (5-Digit reference). The narrower case may be better suited for your wrist size. Good luck.

[MCO1]

If size is a concern then by all means go Explorer 36. It is a cool watch I would no doubt wear one instead of the Explorer 39 if I had a small wrist.

[RolexDad]

Originally Posted by blah114

This looks greats. My explorer is all scratched. Was this ever polished... it looks amazing.

It was in excellent condition when I received it. I don't think it has ever been polished. I have put some dings and scratches on it since this photo was taken. Bezel and clasp show the most wear so far.

[the_natural]

I realize it's not a full Rolex, but what about the Black Bay 36 on a bracelet? Gorgeous, killer value, great build quality, and more. In fact, for weeks I've been mulling over selling my 39 Explorer and getting one...

[dr35mm]

I would recommend 5 Digit sub, got and SD or get the Explorer 1, 36 is a good option but the sweet spot IMO is 39mm..

[antbkny]

How about a daytona? they wear pretty small.

[watchwatcher]

Originally Posted by brandrea

Go vintage 4 or 5 digit Submariner

Originally Posted by RolexDad

Not many options when going small and sporty--I got the 36mm Explorer I. Comfortable and smaller, but the dial and hands really give it a sufficiently masculine look IMO

Originally Posted by The Libertine

Try either the 14060 or 16710 (5-Digit reference). The narrower case may be better suited for your wrist size. Good luck.

Originally Posted by antbkny

How about a daytona? they wear pretty small.

All great ideas...happy hunting!

[douglasf13]

34mm/36mm OP or 36mm Explorer I.

BTW, no Rolex watches are really dress watches, so a 36mm DateJust is versatile, too.

[atsauveur]

Great suggestions, everyone. Thank you.

The lug overhang bothers me personally--I don't care much about the fashion police.

Were there ever any Daytonas with a smaller case size than 40mm?

[douglasf13]

Originally Posted by atsauveur

Great suggestions, everyone. Thank you.

The lug overhang bothers me personally--I don't care much about the fashion police.

Were there ever any Daytonas with a smaller case size than 40mm?

Daytona is actually a little smaller than 40mm, but you'd have to go back to big money, vintage Daytonas to find the even smaller ones.

Have you considered, a Tudor 75090/75190? It's just like their regular Sub, but sized down to 36mm (37mm bezel.)



Here's one for sale (I can't vouch for seller.)

https://www.watchrecon.com/?query=tudor+75190

Heck, if you're looking at Tudor at all, you could also look at my favorite watch, the 76200:

[Tangier11]

The 40 YM looks less bulky than the 40 Sub IMO

[dysondiver]

explorer 2 wears small , but hard to beat a 36mm explorer 1
my daily wear at the moment and loving it.

[douglasf13]

Originally Posted by douglasf13

Daytona is actually a little smaller than 40mm, but you'd have to go back to big money, vintage Daytonas to find the even smaller ones.

Have you considered, a Tudor 75090/75190? It's just like their regular Sub, but sized down to 36mm (37mm bezel.)



Here's one for sale (I can't vouch for seller.)

https://www.watchrecon.com/?query=tudor+75190

Heck, if you're looking at Tudor at all, you could also look at my favorite watch, the 76200:

Oh yeah, there's also the 37mm Yachtmaster:

[Tangier11]

The Turnograph would also be a great 36 option with several metals and bracelets to choose from