ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 February 2018, 05:42 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: New York
Watch: ALS 1815 Chrono
Posts: 36
|
How big does 15400 wear?
I have my name down for a 15202, but because delivery is expected in 2019, I am debating whether I should buy a 15450 or 15400 to ease the wait in the meantime. I have wrists that are on the smaller side, and usually prefer the size 40~42 for sporty watches. The 15400 is 41mm according to official specs, but are there any comparisons to how it really wears? How does it compare to a Omega speedy (42mm) or the Rolex Explorer 2 Polar (42mm)? And same question for the 15450. 37mm officially, but I heard many people say it wears more like a 39mm Explorer. Thanks in advance!
|
19 February 2018, 06:02 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
|
IMO it wears like a 42mm. But the case shape and integrated bracelet are anything but ordinary, so its hard to compare it to other watches like the EX2 or Omega Speedy.
Here are a couple pictures to give you an idea on my 7" relatively flat wrist... 41mm Black Bay 42mm Sky D 40mm LVC 44mm YM2 41mm 15400 |
19 February 2018, 06:13 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,970
|
The 15400 wears larger than my 42mm Exp II.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 126619LB, 116710BLNR, and 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster and Planet Ocean 42; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Nomos Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & SuperOcean 44; Doxa 300 Pro Carbon; Stowa Limette; Laco Napa Flieger; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too |
19 February 2018, 06:58 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
|
It wears deceptively larger than 41mm. I think because it’s square and has a pretty wide bezel. Here’s a comparison to 40mm.
I have about a 7.5 inch wrist. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
19 February 2018, 07:11 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Northern Monkey
Posts: 483
|
It wears a lot bigger than it’s size. Here’s my 15400 and my 15202 for comparison
|
19 February 2018, 07:33 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
I’d wait for the 15202
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
19 February 2018, 09:04 AM | #7 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
|
It wears big and a little wide, the 202 or 15300 are probably your best bets.
|
19 February 2018, 11:30 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2015
Real Name: Nick
Location: CT
Watch: Rolex, Lange
Posts: 185
|
Quote:
|
|
19 February 2018, 12:22 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: hk
Posts: 691
|
Depends on the size of your wrist. 15400 wears similar to GMT2C and the dial is more obvious due to thinner bezel. White dial may appear slightly bigger
|
19 February 2018, 02:43 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: New York
Watch: ALS 1815 Chrono
Posts: 36
|
The gmt master? Hmm... I own a 5711 and I am really happy with its size. The 15202 fits similar to a 5711 am I right?
|
19 February 2018, 03:50 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: hk
Posts: 691
|
|
19 February 2018, 07:02 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Northern Monkey
Posts: 483
|
IMO it doesn't wear anything like a GMTII that sits flush to your wrist, the 15400 is a big lump of a watch with wrist presence
|
19 February 2018, 08:55 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
The 15400 wears big. More like a large 42 or a 43.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789 |
20 February 2018, 08:36 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: USA
Watch: BLNR/116500LN/APRO
Posts: 161
|
It wears large, but my 42mm IWC Porteguiser feels much bigger. It’s got some heft though, especially when you factor in how thin it is - you’d think it would be lighter. My BLNR feels much slimmer.
|
20 February 2018, 09:29 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 4,406
|
I have 7" wrist. Had a 15400 and decided it was too big for me. Sold it and bought the 15300 I still have.
Comparison: Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
20 February 2018, 02:02 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Tony
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: RG Skydweller
Posts: 1,469
|
Here's mine on my 7.5"wrist. I would say it's more suited to a larger wrist.
|
22 February 2018, 02:03 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2012
Location: hk
Posts: 691
|
Wears like 42 or 43 cuz wrist is too skinny ...lol
|
22 February 2018, 02:38 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Clive
Location: The Alps
Watch: collections change
Posts: 6,284
|
I found it wore very large....and I had an Explorer II 42 at the same time....
__________________
. The path from WIShood to WISdom can have many turnings... ——————————————————————————————————— . 16803. 16570. 18038. 114300. GMW-B5000D. |
22 February 2018, 10:20 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: YVR
Watch: Time Only
Posts: 2,332
|
I own the Speedy Moonwatch as well (42mm).
I would say it wears quite similar to the Speedy in terms of wrist presence. My avatar will show how the 15400 Silver Dial wears on my 6.5" wrist. Size and wrist presence really depends on the person. Sometimes a small flat wrist with more surface area wears better than a larger wrist with a rounded presence. My buddy has a round 7"-7.25" wrist and he tried on my 15400. Looked way too big for him while on my wrist it is okay (imo). |
25 February 2018, 05:46 PM | #20 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: somewhere
Posts: 350
|
Not too big
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 February 2018, 06:39 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: New York
Watch: ALS 1815 Chrono
Posts: 36
|
Thank you everyone for you inputs. Really appreciated!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.