The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 21 February 2018, 12:53 PM   #1
jwalker497
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 218
Datejust 41 vs Datejust II

I went to 2 local ADs, neither had a true comparison but based on al the pictures ive seen online, it seems the DJII is a little bigger?! Is this true, does anyone have both or have seen both can chime in? The flutes on the new 41 DJ seems to be smaller, the whole watch seems to be daintier, regardless of what bracelet it is on. Am I off? Please help. thanks
jwalker497 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2018, 01:28 PM   #2
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
Yeah you’re not wrong.

They’re different watches, similar, yes, but it’s a different design.

The DJ2 case is bigger, thicker, with bigger markers, and a little bit of a wider bezel (I think).

The DJ2 looks almost inflated in comparison.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2018, 01:31 PM   #3
Matteo E
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Posts: 377
I read the Explorer II and DJ II share the same case. Wouldn’t surprise me, the DJ II is substantial, that’s why I like it.
Matteo E is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2018, 01:34 PM   #4
jwalker497
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 218
I love the fluted bezel but I also like the super size of the DJII case. To me, the new 41 seems like an old the old 36mm but maybe in 38 now, stil small and meek in comparison, if the bracelet isn't a deal breaker for you either way
jwalker497 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2018, 03:50 PM   #5
Uppersouth
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Uppersouth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Lee
Location: Kentucky
Watch: SWISS
Posts: 1,564
Very different watches indeed. The DJ41 is has a closer feel to a DJ36. I’ve always liked the proportions of the DJ2 better. Much sportier, but I realize what most didn’t like about the proportions were in fact what I liked.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
Two roads diverged in a wood, and I—
I took the one less traveled by,
And that has made all the difference.
-ROBERT FROST
Uppersouth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 February 2018, 08:59 PM   #6
DavidUK
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Leicestershire UK
Posts: 697
I went from DJ36 to DJ41 (which measures 39.84mm across the case) but I did try a couple of DJII models side by side with the DJ41 prior to purchase. The DJ41 is not "dainty" but it is slimmer and better proportioned, in line with the DJ range. DJII was too "fat" for my liking but each to their own.

If considering the DJII, you really should try it next to a DJ41 to make sure your choice is a good one.

Oh... and of course you'll be stuck with an oyster bracelet on the DJII - a real no no if you don't like looking at a scratched bracelet after a few weeks. The jubilee always remains looking pristine (I wore one daily for 15 years on my DJ36 and it always looked immaculate).
DavidUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2018, 02:21 AM   #7
rkim11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Baltimore
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uppersouth View Post
Very different watches indeed. The DJ41 is has a closer feel to a DJ36. I’ve always liked the proportions of the DJ2 better. Much sportier, but I realize what most didn’t like about the proportions were in fact what I liked.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The DJ2 is gorgeous. Big and bold.
rkim11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2018, 02:27 AM   #8
c41006
"TRF" Member
 
c41006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Real Name: Joshua
Location: Atlanta
Watch: Pelagos
Posts: 7,933
The proportions on the DJ II are off in my opinion. The DJ 41 keeps more of the classic DJ proportions. In my mind I think of the DDII and DJII as unsuccessful attempts by Rolex to make larger versions of the classics but then they got it right with the DD40 and DJ41.
c41006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2018, 02:31 AM   #9
Pol1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Belgium
Posts: 226
Datejust II old : 41mm diameter; 12,22mm thick; 3136 movement; 48 h power reserve
Datejust 41 (2016) : 41mm diameter; 11,70mm thick; 3235 movement, 70h power reserve
Notches of the old are a bit wider. Indexes on the dial are a little bit wider too.
Pol1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2018, 02:33 AM   #10
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,793
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2018, 02:37 AM   #11
rkim11
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Baltimore
Watch: 16610LV
Posts: 311
^^^To me, the one on the left looks better. Some want sporty and bold, some want traditional and conservative. Both beautiful.
rkim11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2018, 12:29 PM   #12
GMT Aviator
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GMT Aviator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: London
Posts: 3,318
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pol1 View Post
Datejust II old : 41mm diameter; 12,22mm thick; 3136 movement; 48 h power reserve
Datejust 41 (2016) : 41mm diameter; 11,70mm thick; 3235 movement, 70h power reserve
Notches of the old are a bit wider. Indexes on the dial are a little bit wider too.
Almost but not quite. The DJ41 does not in fact have a 41mm case, its smaller than the DJ2 which is indeed 41mm.

The DJ2 vs DJ41 debate will rage on forever. I liked the DJ2 so much that I have three in total. The term describing the DJ2 as out of proportion is non-sense. Out of proportion to what exactly? Itself or the 36? It was never supposed to be an upscaled replica of a 36 which I think many people hoped it would or should have been.
The DJ2 was a new design. A sporty more youthful take on the traditional look of the classic DJ36 and I believe it achieved that very well. It has its own proportions that suit it very well.
The 41 is a great watch, I like it, but I would personally still pick the DJ2 over the 41 again. Other than a DJ2 I'd go for a 36 in all likelihood.
GMT Aviator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 February 2018, 01:22 PM   #13
chloebear
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 2,902
They are very different watches. To me the DJ2 is sportier and the DJ41 is dressier. They are both beautiful. In general I'd say most folks on TRF prefer the DJ41. I'm in the minority, but I absolutely love the DJ2. So sporty. It'd be a good time to pick one up.
chloebear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2019, 04:36 PM   #14
robinmgb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Kent, England
Watch: Hublot BB Unico
Posts: 1,089
I compared the two models yesterday and would say I preferred the DJ2 because the bezel is slightly larger but the difference is really very small, I was shocked just how similar they are after reading so much about the differences and ‘wrong proportions’ of the DJ2, it’s all been over exaggerated in my opinion, I imagined them being totally different watches and they simply aren’t!
robinmgb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2019, 04:39 PM   #15
robinmgb
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Kent, England
Watch: Hublot BB Unico
Posts: 1,089
Just to point out I was referring of course to the look of the watches not the movement, each one I viewed were on oyster bracelets with fluted bezels and diamond dials
robinmgb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2019, 08:14 PM   #16
DD9506
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Manc, UK
Watch: Sub C,Navi&Pam392
Posts: 15
Both very nice.

The jubilee is a grower imo having previously preferred the oyster. However the laster GMTs probably helped convince me re the jubilee.
DD9506 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2019, 09:36 PM   #17
RolexFan007
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: US and AU
Watch: YM2 116680
Posts: 545
Another thread with same topic

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=649360
__________________
--------------------------------------
RolexFan007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 June 2019, 10:38 PM   #18
Solo118
2024 Pledge Member
 
Solo118's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 6,091
Think of the DJ2 a baggy pants, and the DJ41 is slim fit.
Solo118 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2019, 11:34 AM   #19
baybombers
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Paul
Location: Central Time Zone
Posts: 139
I’ve had my DJII for 6 years or so and still love it. I agree with others who describe it as a sportier version of a DJ.
baybombers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2019, 11:42 AM   #20
illmaticnyc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: nyc
Posts: 6
dj 41!
illmaticnyc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2019, 06:10 PM   #21
jeanjean
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: MN
Posts: 91
DJ 41 is more comfortable to wear similar
to OP 39. 114300.DJ2 is more bulky and sportier
but not that comfortable to wear.
jeanjean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24 June 2019, 06:30 PM   #22
Shamorai
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Sydney
Watch: 16523, 116610LV
Posts: 762
I think the DJ2 looks better.
Both nice, but the DJ2 looks a bit more......exciting?
Shamorai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2019, 01:26 PM   #23
Lex_Ordo
"TRF" Member
 
Lex_Ordo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NY, USA
Posts: 298
I picked the DJII, simply because of the 41mm dial. The bonus was the oyster bracelet. For me it is a nice balance. I have a couple GMTs, and the DJII gives me a dressier look as compared to my GMT when I want to wear it like that.
Lex_Ordo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2019, 01:32 PM   #24
scarlet knight
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Good ones
Posts: 8,468
Here is my DJ 2. I like it.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
scarlet knight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2019, 01:42 PM   #25
Panych
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: 007
Posts: 327
Excellent watch for any occasions.
Panych is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2019, 01:46 PM   #26
ronricks
2024 Pledge Member
 
ronricks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ATL
Watch: 126610LV
Posts: 2,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwalker497 View Post
I went to 2 local ADs, neither had a true comparison but based on al the pictures ive seen online, it seems the DJII is a little bigger?! Is this true, does anyone have both or have seen both can chime in? The flutes on the new 41 DJ seems to be smaller, the whole watch seems to be daintier, regardless of what bracelet it is on. Am I off? Please help. thanks
Datejust 41 is only 39.xx mm.
ronricks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2019, 01:49 PM   #27
AdamWay
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6
DJ2 is Handsome, Bold, Clean, easy to read Big index.
AdamWay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2019, 01:52 PM   #28
AdamWay
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6
Jubilee bracelet makes it look smaller but still Classic, Oyster Bracelet make it looks Bold.. but I still like the Jubilee classic and timeless.
AdamWay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2019, 02:03 PM   #29
Rado63
"TRF" Member
 
Rado63's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Alan
Location: Northern, CA
Watch: 116334
Posts: 2,215
Quote:
Originally Posted by baybombers View Post
I’ve had my DJII for 6 years or so and still love it. I agree with others who describe it as a sportier version of a DJ.
Yes this it, it's the sportier version , bigger watch than DJ41, great if your wrist size can handle the 41 mm. I owned both , sold the DJ41 because its only approximately 39 mm. DJ41 is classical proportions meaning it is more in the traditional dress watch category. My guess is that DJII was probably too large for some markets and was ultimately re sized.
__________________
Rolex 116334 126600 228235
Rado63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2019, 02:24 PM   #30
Bizcut1
2024 Pledge Member
 
Bizcut1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: Ben
Location: Valley of the Sun
Watch: 126331 126610 3861
Posts: 3,253
Love them both. Wear the Jubilee on my DJ41.
Attached Images
 
Bizcut1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.