The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 5 June 2018, 03:14 AM   #1
DonBateman
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: IL
Watch: I like watch
Posts: 753
Interesting Article

Really cool history on Navy SEAL dive watches. I was surprised to see the Sub failed the Navy's test.

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/vi...ving-in-depth#
DonBateman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:18 AM   #2
tyler1980
"TRF" Member
 
tyler1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Houston
Posts: 17,622
Rolex failed the NASA test too. So they are consistent

thanks for the link
__________________
Instagram: tyler.watches
current collection: Patek 5164A, Patek 5524G, Rolex Platinum Daytona 116506, Rolex Sea Dweller 43 126600, Rolex GMT II 116710LN, AP 15400ST (silver), Panerai 913, Omega Speedmaster moonwatch, Tudor Black Bay (Harrods Edition)
tyler1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:19 AM   #3
Uhtred59
"TRF" Member
 
Uhtred59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Real Name: Ken
Location: Europa
Watch: 216570
Posts: 693
__________________
"My center is yielding, my right is retreating. Excellent situation, I am attacking" Ferdinand Foch
Uhtred59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:30 AM   #4
_speedmaster_
"TRF" Member
 
_speedmaster_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,443
Awesome read. It's funny (and a little odd) that the Blancpain FF gets very little recognition to this day, even with its superior pedigree and history (both of which are better than the sub). Ah, the power of marketing.
__________________
Blancpain | Chopard LUC | Grand Seiko/King Seiko | Grönefeld | Laurent Ferrier | Moritz Grossmann | Omega | Trilobe | Urban Jürgensen


instagram.com/ct_watch_guy
_speedmaster_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:36 AM   #5
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by _speedmaster_ View Post
Awesome read. It's funny (and a little odd) that the Blancpain FF gets very little recognition to this day, even with its superior pedigree and history (both of which are better than the sub). Ah, the power of marketing.
The FF is an awesome watch with fantastic pedigree. But it looks stupid silly on my wrist, and it’s near 7.25”. Completely unrealistic for somebody under 7” IMO.
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:39 AM   #6
904VT
"TRF" Member
 
904VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmash View Post
The FF is an awesome watch with fantastic pedigree. But it looks stupid silly on my wrist, and it’s near 7.25”. Completely unrealistic for somebody under 7” IMO.
It's an incredible watch design that has suffered from the same overinflation so many other classics have. The maxi case lug change, seems mild in comparison to some other upsizes
904VT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:44 AM   #7
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by 904VT View Post
It's an incredible watch design that has suffered from the same overinflation so many other classics have. The maxi case lug change, seems mild in comparison to some other upsizes
Yup, completely agree. 45mm is just ridiculous and looks like some trendy clown piece IMO (sorry FF owners).
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:44 AM   #8
GerardoG
Banned
 
GerardoG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Gerardo
Location: Here
Watch: ALL of them
Posts: 32,098
Nice read, thank you for sharing!
GerardoG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:46 AM   #9
DonBateman
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: IL
Watch: I like watch
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmash View Post
The FF is an awesome watch with fantastic pedigree. But it looks stupid silly on my wrist, and it’s near 7.25”. Completely unrealistic for somebody under 7” IMO.
That is why it does not get as much love as the Sub. That, and Rolex is a master at marketing.
DonBateman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:46 AM   #10
_speedmaster_
"TRF" Member
 
_speedmaster_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmash View Post
The FF is an awesome watch with fantastic pedigree. But it looks stupid silly on my wrist, and it’s near 7.25”. Completely unrealistic for somebody under 7” IMO.
It's marketing. Plain and simple.

Just look at how many people wet themselves over the Deepsea. Or the SD43. Those are equally "stupid silly" on smaller wrists. How many of those people considered a FF?

Also, BP make a 40mm limited edition (500 pieces) tribute to mil-spec. There is also a 38mm bathyscaphe. Both of those watches are extremely easy to obtain. Meanwhile, you have people paying thousands premium subs.
__________________
Blancpain | Chopard LUC | Grand Seiko/King Seiko | Grönefeld | Laurent Ferrier | Moritz Grossmann | Omega | Trilobe | Urban Jürgensen


instagram.com/ct_watch_guy
_speedmaster_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:46 AM   #11
DonBateman
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: IL
Watch: I like watch
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by tyler1980 View Post
Rolex failed the NASA test too. So they are consistent

thanks for the link
Good point! I forget about that one.
DonBateman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:48 AM   #12
_speedmaster_
"TRF" Member
 
_speedmaster_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmash View Post
Yup, completely agree. 45mm is just ridiculous and looks like some trendy clown piece IMO (sorry FF owners).
Curious. Would you also tell Deepsea and SD 43 owners the same? Or owners of certain AP ROs?
__________________
Blancpain | Chopard LUC | Grand Seiko/King Seiko | Grönefeld | Laurent Ferrier | Moritz Grossmann | Omega | Trilobe | Urban Jürgensen


instagram.com/ct_watch_guy
_speedmaster_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:51 AM   #13
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by _speedmaster_ View Post
It's marketing. Plain and simple.

Just look at how many people wet themselves over the Deepsea. Or the SD43. Those are equally "stupid silly" on smaller wrists. How many of those people considered a FF?

Also, BP make a 40mm limited edition (500 pieces) tribute to mil-spec. There is also a 38mm bathyscaphe. Both of those watches are extremely easy to obtain. Meanwhile, you have people paying thousands premium subs.
I dislike the anniversary model due to the text and dislike the milspec due to the indicator at 6 o’clock. I’d 100% be interested in a regular FF at 40-41mm. 45mm isn’t even big, it’s ridiculously huge (IMO). A lot of people use a black diver as their daily, that’s a chunk and a half to wear every day.
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:51 AM   #14
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by _speedmaster_ View Post
Curious. Would you also tell Deepsea and SD 43 owners the same? Or owners of certain AP ROs?
You’re *technically* comparing 43-44mm to 45mm
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 03:58 AM   #15
_speedmaster_
"TRF" Member
 
_speedmaster_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmash View Post
You’re *technically* comparing 43-44mm to 45mm
Haha. Fair enough.

The tribute to mil-spec isn't for everyone stylistically, i certainly get that.

A part of me wonders what would happen if Rolex released a tribute sub with red text limited to 500 pieces. You wouldn't get able to get your hands on one unless you ran OPEC.

Im curious to see it BP release a regular 40mm FF. They released a smaller bathyscaphe, so maybe they're starting to wise up and realize 40mm and under is the way to go (certainly for people with small wrists like myself).
__________________
Blancpain | Chopard LUC | Grand Seiko/King Seiko | Grönefeld | Laurent Ferrier | Moritz Grossmann | Omega | Trilobe | Urban Jürgensen


instagram.com/ct_watch_guy
_speedmaster_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 04:29 AM   #16
DonBateman
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: IL
Watch: I like watch
Posts: 753
Quote:
Originally Posted by _speedmaster_ View Post
Haha. Fair enough.

The tribute to mil-spec isn't for everyone stylistically, i certainly get that.

A part of me wonders what would happen if Rolex released a tribute sub with red text limited to 500 pieces. You wouldn't get able to get your hands on one unless you ran OPEC.

Im curious to see it BP release a regular 40mm FF. They released a smaller bathyscaphe, so maybe they're starting to wise up and realize 40mm and under is the way to go (certainly for people with small wrists like myself).
If they release a smaller (40-42mm) FF, I'm all over it. They have to know that would sell like hot cakes.
DonBateman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 04:43 AM   #17
_speedmaster_
"TRF" Member
 
_speedmaster_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by DonBateman View Post
If they release a smaller (40-42mm) FF, I'm all over it. They have to know that would sell like hot cakes.
Would certainly make sense in this current environment of SS sport models shortages from Rolex, AP and PP. Prime time for them to swoop in an offer a reasonably sized alternative.

I will say that I tried on the limited Mil-spec (40mm) and loved it. Great proportions and the build quality was actually better than Rolex (imho). So, if they can do that for the regular FF line, it would be a great offering.
__________________
Blancpain | Chopard LUC | Grand Seiko/King Seiko | Grönefeld | Laurent Ferrier | Moritz Grossmann | Omega | Trilobe | Urban Jürgensen


instagram.com/ct_watch_guy
_speedmaster_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 05:44 AM   #18
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by _speedmaster_ View Post
Would certainly make sense in this current environment of SS sport models shortages from Rolex, AP and PP. Prime time for them to swoop in an offer a reasonably sized alternative.

I will say that I tried on the limited Mil-spec (40mm) and loved it. Great proportions and the build quality was actually better than Rolex (imho). So, if they can do that for the regular FF line, it would be a great offering.
I don’t get why the don’t do something like Omega with the Planet Ocean. A large and ‘mid size’
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 05:52 AM   #19
_speedmaster_
"TRF" Member
 
_speedmaster_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Earth
Posts: 2,443
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmash View Post
I don’t get why the don’t do something like Omega with the Planet Ocean. A large and ‘mid size’
It's really foolish. They're forgoing such a large potential customer base by only offering very large FF watches. Even the bathyscaphe was large at 43mm (until this very recent 38mm offering).

I never even gave BP a thought for this very reason, until I saw that mil-spec 40mm from last year's Basel. When I went to try it on, I was kind of blown away by the quality and feel of the watch. Would have never stepped foot in a BP boutique if that 40mm never came out.
__________________
Blancpain | Chopard LUC | Grand Seiko/King Seiko | Grönefeld | Laurent Ferrier | Moritz Grossmann | Omega | Trilobe | Urban Jürgensen


instagram.com/ct_watch_guy
_speedmaster_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 June 2018, 05:58 AM   #20
dmash
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA <> BKK
Posts: 6,160
Quote:
Originally Posted by _speedmaster_ View Post
It's really foolish. They're forgoing such a large potential customer base by only offering very large FF watches. Even the bathyscaphe was large at 43mm (until this very recent 38mm offering).

I never even gave BP a thought for this very reason, until I saw that mil-spec 40mm from last year's Basel. When I went to try it on, I was kind of blown away by the quality and feel of the watch. Would have never stepped foot in a BP boutique if that 40mm never came out.
What’s so funny, is if you think about it, even Rolex has done this. A SD at 43 and a Sub at 40mm (and even a Deep Sea for another 44mm option). It’s just smart to offer that variety nowadays, especially if the movement can simply plug and play into the other case. It’s so little work to actually make it happen.


As stated before, the FF definitely an awesome watch, and one is just being a fanboy to try and talk down its pedigree. I agree with the other poster, 40-42mm and not extra writing like they did on the anniversary model, I would definitely take a look at this HARD. It’s different enough for me, to run alongside a Sub or SD too. It’s an all around cool piece, just too big at current state.
dmash is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.