ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
1 September 2018, 04:40 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: London
Posts: 57
|
1803 without bracelet
Hi - I am considering getting a 1803 and wanted to get some opinions on whether it would be a bad idea to get an 1803 without a bracelet (noting that I am highly unlikely to ever wear it with the gold bracelet)? The reason I am asking is that there are a lot more dial configurations I like that are only available on strap
Thanks Erik Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
1 September 2018, 08:45 PM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: achille
Location: Grosse Pointe Mi.
Watch: 16613 serti 18078
Posts: 446
|
You just answered your own question !
|
1 September 2018, 11:38 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Pete
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: 1016.
Posts: 694
|
For steel watches I don't mind not having the bracelet because I can wear the watch on leather or perlon. For gold watches I'm only wearing them in the heat if I have the bracelet...my RG 1012 gets zero wrist time in summer because it's on leather.
I'd recommend getting the watch on a good tight bracelet, that's what I did with my 1803. But what's right for me mightn't be right for you - and remember this is an 1803, not a rare watch. You can always find a bracelet later and have Michael Young restore it to new, if you can't live without it. |
7 September 2018, 07:54 AM | #4 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
|
its very common and popular for 1803 to be on a strap
I prefer mine on black croc |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.