The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 January 2009, 02:55 AM   #1
alphamale2012
"TRF" Member
 
alphamale2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Posts: 1,305
What looks best on small wrist?

I got two weeks to decide on a new watch. Leaning toward sub nd but in the last few days I'm thinking gmt tt coke looks rather good too. I have a rather small wrist (only 6.5 inch) so which do you think would look better? I can see myself getting the sub nd now and waiting till basel 09 for the new coke? Your support is appreciated
alphamale2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 02:57 AM   #2
Rolexitis
"TRF" Member
 
Rolexitis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Earth
Watch: 114060
Posts: 3,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale2012 View Post
I got two weeks to decide on a new watch. Leaning toward sub nd but in the last few days I'm thinking gmt tt coke looks rather good too. I have a rather small wrist (only 6.5 inch) so which do you think would look better? I can see myself getting the sub nd now and waiting till basel 09 for the new coke? Your support is appreciated
Does the GMT TT come in a "coke" bezel? ...Both watches are 40mm so they will both look close to the same. Get the one you like MOST.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Rolexitis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 02:58 AM   #3
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale2012 View Post
I got two weeks to decide on a new watch. Leaning toward sub nd but in the last few days I'm thinking gmt tt coke looks rather good too. I have a rather small wrist (only 6.5 inch) so which do you think would look better? I can see myself getting the sub nd now and waiting till basel 09 for the new coke? Your support is appreciated
I know you're talking about sports Rolex watches, but with a 6½" wrist, I'd buy a dressy DJ with WG fluted bezel and new Super Jubilee bracelet!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 02:59 AM   #4
Rolexitis
"TRF" Member
 
Rolexitis's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Earth
Watch: 114060
Posts: 3,203
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
I know you're talking about sports Rolex watches, but with a 6½" wrist, I'd buy a dressy DJ with WG fluted bezel and new Super Jubilee bracelet!!
YAYAHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons
Rolexitis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:03 AM   #5
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Man, 6.5" is FINE for a 40mm sport. A lot of it is how "flat" your wrist is.

I have a 6.5"

40mm


42mm

45mm

40mm

44mm
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:06 AM   #6
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Oh and if you are really worried about size, try on the Explorer II. It fits and looks very small even though it is a 40mm sport.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:08 AM   #7
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by mfer View Post
Oh and if you are really worried about size, try on the Explorer II. It fits and looks very small even though it is a 40mm sport.
Err...small correction, my friend. The Exp-II is in actual fact 39 mm. I should know, I've measured it with a Vernier Caliper!!
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:12 AM   #8
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Err...small correction, my friend. The Exp-II is in actual fact 39 mm. I should know, I've measured it with a Vernier Caliper!!
Maybe that is why it looks smaller then...
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:14 AM   #9
tommypit
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: tommy
Location: NYC
Watch: 2005 TT Sub Black
Posts: 279
Small Wrist

Hi

I have small wrist as well. I had a SS DJ and I traded it for the TTSub.

I think both of them look great! The sub is larger,however it doesnt look out of proportion on my wrist.

I would agree that some watches are to big for my wrist. I tried on the breitling super avenger and that was to big for my wrist(my opinion).

I would get the Sub, I feel its the staple any good collection!

I will post a pic of the watch on my wrist when I get home. Hope this was helpful.
Tom
tommypit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:16 AM   #10
Alan111
"TRF" Member
 
Alan111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,605


Hi, I have about a 6 1/4 inch wrist and I bought a Datejust. I love this datejust so much, but its getting a beating bc I wear it everyday. The datejust looks perfect on my wrist. However, I too am looking to get a Sub for an everyday watch. I have tried it on before, it seems ok, but at the same time, a little too big.

I then thought about a midsize Seamaster ... decisions, decisions, decisions
Alan111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:18 AM   #11
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Alan, you'll be fine. 5 years ago I thought a 40mm sub was too big b/c I was wearing a 35mm Fossil all the time. Just go buy a cheap 40mm watch and wear it for a week and you'll be craving the larger size.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:18 AM   #12
JJ Irani
Fondly Remembered
 
JJ Irani's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan111 View Post


Hi, I have about a 6 1/4 inch wrist and I bought a Datejust. I love this datejust so much, but its getting a beating bc I wear it everyday. The datejust looks perfect on my wrist. However, I too am looking to get a Sub for an everyday watch. I have tried it on before, it seems ok, but at the same time, a little too big.

I then thought about a midsize Seamaster ... decisions, decisions, decisions
Try a white dial Exp-II. It sits nice and flat with its gently sloping fixed bezel and is very comfortale on the wrist. Should be perfect for a wrist of your size.

JJ
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!!

I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!!
JJ Irani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:19 AM   #13
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
My wrist is a little bigger than 6.5 - but not much. My 40mm Sub looks great - not to big. My 36mm DJ looks perfect. With your wrist size you should be fine with anything up to 40mm, which for the present means all Rolex models.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:26 AM   #14
tommypit
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: tommy
Location: NYC
Watch: 2005 TT Sub Black
Posts: 279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan111 View Post


Hi, I have about a 6 1/4 inch wrist and I bought a Datejust. I love this datejust so much, but its getting a beating bc I wear it everyday. The datejust looks perfect on my wrist. However, I too am looking to get a Sub for an everyday watch. I have tried it on before, it seems ok, but at the same time, a little too big.

I then thought about a midsize Seamaster ... decisions, decisions, decisions
my wrist about same size. I have full size sea master-looks great!
my everyday watch which I wear lifting weights, hammering nails etc. Extremely durable
tommypit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:41 AM   #15
alphamale2012
"TRF" Member
 
alphamale2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Posts: 1,305
mfer great pics. jj great suggestion. Any pics? I have a feeling once I'm back in London and visit my AD i be getting a sub nd and a datejust.
alphamale2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:48 AM   #16
f16570
"TRF" Member
 
f16570's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: F
Location: Scotland
Watch: Exp II White Face
Posts: 4,272
What looks best on small wrist?
SMALL HANDS & FINGERS?
__________________
Why have what's new when you have what's best.
f
f16570 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:50 AM   #17
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale2012 View Post
mfer great pics. jj great suggestion. Any pics? I have a feeling once I'm back in London and visit my AD i be getting a sub nd and a datejust.
A great choice - the two classic and iconic Rolex models. No two watches epitomise Rolex better.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:50 AM   #18
alphamale2012
"TRF" Member
 
alphamale2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Posts: 1,305
Awesome
alphamale2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:50 AM   #19
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by f16570 View Post
What looks best on small wrist?
SMALL HANDS & FINGERS?
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 03:57 AM   #20
cody p
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Canada
Watch: Air-King 114200
Posts: 2,878
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale2012 View Post
mfer great pics. jj great suggestion. Any pics? I have a feeling once I'm back in London and visit my AD i be getting a sub nd and a datejust.
i have a 6.25 inch wrist and currently wear an AK. i can pull off a 40mm, but anything above that starts looking a little 'clownish' on me. i'm sure you could pull off a sub no prob. you seem like a 'rough and tumble' guy, have you considered an explorer instead of the DJ? also, when trying on watches, view them on your wrist from a mirror, this is how the watch actually appears; when you just look down at it while it's on your wrist it tends to look bigger to you than it is. my 2 pennies.
cody p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 04:26 AM   #21
zak98
"TRF" Member
 
zak98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: TN
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,166
this looks good on my 7 1/2" wrist, even.




__________________
Z- Submariner; P- Airking; R- DateJust; M- GMTII; C0 - Milgauss GV
Breitling SuperOcean Heritage 46
Omega Speedmaster Racing
Panerai PAM390
zak98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 04:38 AM   #22
erasuretim
"TRF" Member
 
erasuretim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: cranfield, uk
Watch: 14060m
Posts: 251
I have the same size wrists - the 14060m looks great I think. Not too big or small.



Regards

Tim
erasuretim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 04:40 AM   #23
Chris B
"TRF" Member
 
Chris B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
Can't believe it, I just measured my wrist, what a place this is

Here you go, a shot of my scrawny 6.5 inch wrist sporting a 40mm GMT, looks great doesn't it?




Chris B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 04:51 AM   #24
charliec
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 969
Don't worry about your wrist size. It's what you do with it that counts.
__________________
Milgauss GV
DSSD
SS Daytona White
Mid-size DJ
Tudor 18ct Prince
charliec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 05:14 AM   #25
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
small wrist huh! try the midsize Yachtmaster or Date watch.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 05:16 AM   #26
alphamale2012
"TRF" Member
 
alphamale2012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Posts: 1,305
That airking looks so good zak. Chris that gmt does look good.
alphamale2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 05:19 AM   #27
shaggy
"TRF" Member
 
shaggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: leeds,uk
Watch: BLUE ARAB DAYTONA
Posts: 691
What looks best on small wrist?

a 6 foot woman
shaggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 05:39 AM   #28
SPORTSFAN
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: NW England
Posts: 791
Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
Try a white dial Exp-II. It sits nice and flat with its gently sloping fixed bezel and is very comfortale on the wrist. Should be perfect for a wrist of your size.

JJ
Very much X2

I think that would be GREAT............


Regards Mike.
SPORTSFAN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 06:37 AM   #29
CPTL
"TRF" Member
 
CPTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Texas on my mind
Watch: Sub Date; SS/WG DJ
Posts: 2,445
I'll second (or third, or fourth) the Explorer-II nomination. Absolutely killer watch, and doesn't look nearly as bulky as the Sub or GMT-II (due to the sloping, fixed bezel).
__________________

16610 Submariner Date; D Serial
16234 DateJust SS with WG Fluted Bezel & Jubillee, White Roman Dial; F Serial
16570 Explorer II White Dial; M Serial

And Hers: 78240 Mid-Size DateJust SS with Domed Bezel & Oyster, White Roman; D Serial
CPTL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 January 2009, 07:25 AM   #30
mingsta
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 185
Here's a GMT C on my 6.75" wrist.

I went over the size/fit issue in my head too before I got the GMT. I concur that the Explorer II will wear a little smaller than the others, my brother in law had one for comparison. However, you honestly can't go wrong with any of your choices - 40mm isn't big by today's standards and even the supposedly beefier GMT C looks quite dainty compared to some of its peers. Go for the one you like best as I reckon they'll all look great on a slim wrist.
Attached Images
 
mingsta is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.