The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 October 2018, 12:29 PM   #1
Zman15
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: US
Posts: 294
Explorer II on 6.5 wrist

Good evening, Gentlemen-

I must rely on my fellow forum members regarding the title. With the shortage of SS sport models, I have been unsuccessful with the opportunity to try on the explorer II 42mm and have diligently been calling AD's within a 4 hour drive for the last two months. This will be my anniversary present from my loving wife. I can wear a explorer I and SubC no issues. I also have a seiko turtle that ,I think fits fine. If it too big will go for the GMT LN. Just not sure in my opinion of the bling factor in the GMT. I work on business side of healthcare and do travel for my job and like the more subtle explorer II.Thanks gents!
Zman15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 12:34 PM   #2
faaaaaaaasterrrrr
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: United States
Watch: Another One?
Posts: 246
My wrist is roughly the same size as yours. If you think the Seiko turtle is fine, then I imagine that you’ll feel the same about an EXPII.
faaaaaaaasterrrrr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 12:36 PM   #3
Rogdogg
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Rogdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bangkok
Posts: 6,124
I think it also depends on your wrist shape.
If your wrist is narrow but flat it could be fine whereas if your wrist was much more round it might not look so good.

Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
__________________
Nil Satis Nisi Optimum
Rogdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 12:48 PM   #4
Bladeshot
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Bladeshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Real Name: Grant
Location: U.S.
Watch: GMT 1675 PCG Gilt
Posts: 5,850
I have a 7.25” flat wrist and have owned both the 5 digit and the 216570 42mm. The black 42mm was fine for me, and I kind of miss it. The lugs definitely went all the way across my wrist. White will “wear bigger”.

I am a GMT guy and the GMT Ceramic is perfect for me. The polished center links and ceramic insert reflect light, but they don’t seem too obvious. Especially when you think about scuffing them up. Eventually mine end up looking brushed. Like you, I prefer brushed bracelets.

I think you have to try the 42mm to know for sure. If you buy pre-owned, you could slip it on and see. Return it if you don’t like it. Just check with the seller to be sure you comply with their terms for returns and condition of the watch.

For me, the Ceramic GMT is the best fit of the modern Rolex you mentioned, and I have chosen not to replace my explorer ii, yet. Compared to the submariner you have, the Ceramic GMT fits my wrist better. Which ever one you end up getting, you’re a winner with a wife who plans presents like that! Happy hunting. That’s the best part.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Just another WIS who loves to trade...
Bladeshot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 03:29 PM   #5
prlwatch
"TRF" Member
 
prlwatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: CA
Watch: 16710 BLRO w/3186
Posts: 120
I have 6.5" wrist and found modern Explorer II is too large for me. Previous generation is perfect.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
prlwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 09:53 PM   #6
Frits1980
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: N/A
Posts: 600
It wears big, especialy the Polar. I have '7+inch wrists and although i can wear it i regret not getting the 40mm version. This model doesnt need 42mm in my opinion. With 6.5 i would definitely go for the 40mm. You can find them easily in NOS condition.
Attached Images
 
Frits1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 04:33 AM   #7
crazymcmichael
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frits1980 View Post
It wears big, especialy the Polar. I have '7+inch wrists and although i can wear it i regret not getting the 40mm version. This model doesnt need 42mm in my opinion. With 6.5 i would definitely go for the 40mm. You can find them easily in NOS condition.
It wears larger on your big wrist than on mine 6.3inch wrist……… I think everyone can pull this version off easily as my girlfriend with 5.5 inch wrist also looks stuning with it without being ''oversized''
It is her favorite Rolex model and she wants one too so badly lol..
crazymcmichael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 02:07 PM   #8
DLRIDES
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
DLRIDES's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Don
Location: NC/WY
Watch: Me
Posts: 4,676
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frits1980 View Post
It wears big, especialy the Polar. I have '7+inch wrists and although i can wear it i regret not getting the 40mm version. This model doesnt need 42mm in my opinion. With 6.5 i would definitely go for the 40mm. You can find them easily in NOS condition.

IMO - That watch does NOT look big on you ...........
__________________
Purchasing your first non HOA home on a 3 acre lot DOES NOT equate to owning a “farm”.
DLRIDES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 10:14 PM   #9
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,047
You'll be fine. Fellow smaller wrist here, and the EXP2 is one of my best fitting, most comfortable watches.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 October 2018, 10:58 PM   #10
Mattomatic
"TRF" Member
 
Mattomatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Matt
Location: Toronto, ON
Watch: Explorer 1
Posts: 292
I have similar sized wrists to yours and the Exp II was too large for me. Looked a bit awkward.

GMT 2C fits like a glove.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
--------------------------------
116710BLNR - DJ 1601- Explorer 124270 - Pepsi 16710
http://instagram.com/timetowatch
Mattomatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 04:25 AM   #11
sensui
2024 Pledge Member
 
sensui's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,446
It would be the limit IMO for that wrist size (I have a similar sized wrist and sold mine). Doesn't change the fact it's a great watch and built like a tank, sometimes I miss mine.
sensui is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 04:31 AM   #12
crazymcmichael
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zman15 View Post
Good evening, Gentlemen-

I must rely on my fellow forum members regarding the title. With the shortage of SS sport models, I have been unsuccessful with the opportunity to try on the explorer II 42mm and have diligently been calling AD's within a 4 hour drive for the last two months. This will be my anniversary present from my loving wife. I can wear a explorer I and SubC no issues. I also have a seiko turtle that ,I think fits fine. If it too big will go for the GMT LN. Just not sure in my opinion of the bling factor in the GMT. I work on business side of healthcare and do travel for my job and like the more subtle explorer II.Thanks gents!
Hey there, the 42mmis perfect for a 6.5 inch wrist. It is just slightly larger than a subc but it wears ''flatter'' on the wrist. I have a 6.5 inch wrist aswell and prefer the look of the watch above my SUB.. I have been worried about the same subject but was convinced once i fitted it on the wrist. I have the white version and you would certainly not regret this watch
crazymcmichael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 04:33 AM   #13
BakerView
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Real Name: "BG"
Location: PacNW
Watch: that I'm Jonesin 4
Posts: 626
Me too. Small wrists and the Expl II didn't look right on the wrist which was a total bummer because it's a great looking watch. Crank it down to a 40mm and keep the dial design and it would be perfect.
BakerView is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 04:34 AM   #14
AF_Rob
"TRF" Member
 
AF_Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,674
Our wrists are similar and I have tried it on. I think it looks fine. It’s thin (kind of) and it sits pretty flat and quite wearable.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AF_Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 04:48 AM   #15
crazymcmichael
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by AF_Rob View Post
Our wrists are similar and I have tried it on. I think it looks fine. It’s thin (kind of) and it sits pretty flat and quite wearable.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yes it is more comfortable to wear than my Sub..
crazymcmichael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 04:51 AM   #16
Vinyasa
"TRF" Member
 
Vinyasa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Steve
Location: Maine
Watch: Explorer II 16570
Posts: 1,396
I have 6.5" wrists also. Tried on the 216570 a few years ago, and it was pushing my limit of tolerance. The 16570 wears much better on me, and I couldn't be happier with my polar. The GMT II also wears nicely.
Vinyasa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 05:04 AM   #17
ROLEXster
"TRF" Member
 
ROLEXster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Vancouver, BC
Watch: is on BS wait list
Posts: 990
My wrist is 6.75"
I think it looks a bit big on me.
Attached Images
 
ROLEXster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 09:55 AM   #18
The Libertine
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROLEXster View Post
My wrist is 6.75"
I think it looks a bit big on me.
Sure does.
The Libertine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 06:34 AM   #19
soho
2024 Pledge Member
 
soho's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: Varies
Posts: 2,057
Have you thought about going with a 5 digit? It might be a better fit on a smaller wrist, it is for me.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
soho is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 07:34 AM   #20
crazymcmichael
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
try to localize one and make judgement on that occassion. I was afraid for the same ''thing'' but i found directly that it made a perfect fit on my wrist. Close up shots of wrists might also be a bit tricky as a watch tend to look much larger on photo than irl
try it on… It is really not so big,, and i like the new reference much more than the old but thats personal opinion
crazymcmichael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 08:33 AM   #21
Nocomment
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Watch: 116600
Posts: 111
Will fit you fine. I'm 6.5, and the best fitting is to put in a half link (from submariner) on the 6 o'clock side (remove all links from 6 o'clock and add in a half link), and remove three links from the 12 side.

Thats the perfect fit for me and I got the black dial. The watch is so flat on the wrist it's very comfy.
Nocomment is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 09:23 AM   #22
1WatchDawg
"TRF" Member
 
1WatchDawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: GEORGIA
Watch: 16610T Sub Date
Posts: 413
I have a 6.75" wrist and the Explorer II was big on me. Would recommend the GMT or a 40mm. Explorer II.
1WatchDawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 10:07 AM   #23
doubleclass
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: usa
Posts: 112
Should fit perfectly IMO
doubleclass is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 11:18 AM   #24
nikesupremedunk
"TRF" Member
 
nikesupremedunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,227
As much as I wanted to like the 216570 polar, it just didn't fit right for me. Also have a ~6.5" wrist here and the 42mm wasn't the issue, the lug to lug was too long and it went past my wrist.
__________________
| 116234 DJ36 | 116610LN SubC | 116520 Daytona | BlackBay 58 Blue |
nikesupremedunk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 01:07 PM   #25
Zman15
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: US
Posts: 294
Thanks for all the feedback. Going with the GMT LN
Zman15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 10:55 PM   #26
crazymcmichael
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: Here
Watch: Sub 114060, 216570
Posts: 2,157
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zman15 View Post
Thanks for all the feedback. Going with the GMT LN
:( try to find one bro.. Dont let you scare without fitting one.. Im nearly sure u will be surprised how it fits.
crazymcmichael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 11:01 PM   #27
rebel_1
"TRF" Member
 
rebel_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,132
I have a 7.5” wrist. I owned a black dial Exp II for a year or so and flipped it. I just prefer case sizes between 39 mm & 41 mm. I would look for a polar 16570.

If Rolex ever makes a 40 mm Exp II with the big orange hand, I’ll buy it ASAP!
__________________
Official Member: 'Perpetual 30' Vegas International GTG 2016
Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017
rebel_1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 11:05 PM   #28
scarlet knight
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Good ones
Posts: 8,468
I have a 6.5 inch wrist. Maybe the Exp 2 is a little big on me, but I am comfortable with it. One of my favorite watches, never gave a second of thought to selling it.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
scarlet knight is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 11:05 PM   #29
avega357
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Miami
Watch: Rolex GMT's BLNR
Posts: 797
Honestly,

I wore one for a while and found it too big, I also own the turtle which I loved but also found it big for my 6.5 inch wrist.

I would go smaller
avega357 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 October 2018, 11:54 PM   #30
melrob1
"TRF" Member
 
melrob1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Colorado
Posts: 968
Does depend on the shape of your wrist. It does ware big. My advice as it look like you are in Houston. Give Thanh (Takuya) a call and he will have one for you to try and and purchase id you like.
melrob1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.