ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 December 2018, 02:47 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: HND/SEA/CDG/AMS
Watch: Clock on my A330
Posts: 779
|
The case for buying above MSRP
Obviously, the ideal Rolex steel-sports purchase is at a duty-free Rolex AD -- at the airport for example. But legally you should be declaring the purchase as you go through customs in your country anyway. (And the odds that the watch is available as you make your way through the airport are slim.)
So realistically, you buy at a local AD where you'll pay full price plus sales tax. In many big cities like Chicago, New York, or Los Angeles, you'll pay close to 10% in sales tax. In many countries in Europe, we're talking 20%. On a Hulk, Daytona, or Pepsi this is big money. There is no telling when the watch will be available at your AD, and what the sales tax or MSRP will be at when the watch is available, as waiting lists are not made public. The only thing you know is that there will be no discount. With time, MSRP and sales tax are likely to go up, not down. Sales taxes are less unpopular than property taxes because it is a consumer tax. Americans are often cash-poor but land-rich. So sales taxes are more likely to be approved or voted on to bolster state coffers. Rolex MSRP can only go up, as I believe Rolex steel-sports models are currently underpriced; I believe the new movements will be the justification for the price increase. Online grey dealers are not currently under the obligation to charge sales tax. This might soon change as Internet sales taxes are falling under more scrutiny because brick-and-mortars complain they can't compete. I predict online sellers in all industries will be made responsible for charging sales tax at checkout. Currently online grey dealers will offer no sales tax and free overnight shipping. (I'm not a grey dealer, just a Rolex lover.) If Rolex shortage is mostly due to increased demand, and more people than ever in the history of the world have the financial wherewithal to buy into such an aspirational brand -- whose reputation constantly ranks first -- the shortage might get worse, not better. I heard Rolex is increasing output, but I don't think we've seen the peak demand yet -- and demand will continue to outpace supply. Do you want to wait one or two more years for that hard-to-get Rolex and roll the dice to save $500, $1000 or even $2000 depending on the model? MSRP and sales tax are both such unknown variables that paying "grey prices" now can make sense. Plus, in two years, who knows what the market value will be. The Daytona didn't jump straight from $12,000 to $22,000. But it has relentlessly gone up and is standing at $22,000 now. So go buy that Hulk or BLNR and enjoy them now!
__________________
Rolex stories you won't find anywhere else: https://coron.et |
2 December 2018, 02:58 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: SD43
Posts: 894
|
I got lucky with a same day call to an AD on my BLNR, but I wasn't so lucky with my LVc. Love them both equally.
|
2 December 2018, 03:04 PM | #3 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: .
Posts: 6,692
|
Your comparing the wrong watches.
If you were around long enough you would know Daytona's have been selling premium for decades already. Long long long long before any of this crazy hype. Daytona premium has been the norm for decades. But when every SS watch selling above MSRP? Yeah naaaahhhh that is bubble territory |
2 December 2018, 03:06 PM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
|
I say buy what's available at MSRP and be happy with it.
Aside from some complications that people might need for business or whatever, every Rolex is essentially the same, except for the way it's cased up. They're all solid, durable, and precise machines with timeless designs. I know that this opinion is outright heresy, but I think that the smart money goes to what's on the AD's shelves at any given moment or to whatever the AD can deliver within a reasonable time-frame. If it's prestige beyond the Rolex brand or investments that one is interested in, there are better ways to meet those desires.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
2 December 2018, 03:17 PM | #5 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Long Island
Watch: 500C, BLRO
Posts: 300
|
Quote:
|
|
2 December 2018, 04:24 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: california coast
Watch: rolex 116300
Posts: 741
|
If you buy above msrp you have more money than smarts
Sent from my Moto G (5) Plus using Tapatalk |
2 December 2018, 04:28 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: United States
Posts: 76
|
They look really nice
|
2 December 2018, 04:29 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 1,284
|
Daytonas have always gone for a premium
Everything else is just a temporary phase imo Only time will tell. If you have a boat load of cash you are more likely to pay over rrp |
2 December 2018, 05:23 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 50
|
Seems like either OP is a gray dealer himself or does not understand economic cycles.
"If Rolex shortage is mostly due to increased demand, and more people than ever in the history of the world have the financial wherewithal to buy into such an aspirational brand -- whose reputation constantly ranks first -- the shortage might get worse, not better." Talk to anyone who works in corporate debt, and look at Asian markets. There are massive red flags of a significant market correction (SHCOMP down 22% YTD). I was only in my first job out of undergrad in 2008, but I remember what watches were selling for on the pre-owned market. |
2 December 2018, 08:52 PM | #10 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: London
Watch: 1680/8 & '88 16528
Posts: 723
|
Quote:
Daytonas prior to 1988 were particularly bad sellers that sold for discount. People didn’t want the gaudy dials of the now “Paul Newman” fame. They do now - because they’re rare, and only rare because not many were sold in the first place. The “Zenith movement” Daytona of 1988 sold much better but were rare not due to demand, but due to lack of productivity. Zenith were making movements for many companies and could not supply as many as Rolex would have liked. This demand (Originally due to factors out of Rolex’s hands) has continued ever since but is now due to Rolex. If it weren’t for Zenith’s lack of movement supply, perhaps the Daytona wouldn’t have been in such demand - now perpetuated by Rolex. |
|
2 December 2018, 09:29 PM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: OP 39 White
Posts: 118
|
Quote:
FWIW, the 6 digit Explorer II fits this profile. At ADs as well as the greys there's not much wait or grey premium for this model. |
|
2 December 2018, 10:09 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,588
|
I think what we are doing here is known as rationalization.
Such an interesting thread topic even though they aren't intended to be about it. It's no wonder there are 5 threads per week about it. My favorites: Life is short, you can't wait 6 months for that new bezel color. Time is money, ....(actually, nothing that makes any sense ever follows this one) They are underpriced at ADs, the grey sellers are the ones with it priced to the market so you should be happy paying market price. |
2 December 2018, 10:46 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: USA
Watch: All
Posts: 5,316
|
Quote:
Perfect! Amazing how the human mind can convince itself of anything.
__________________
Rolex 228235 DD40 Olive, 126710BLRO, 116710BLNR, 116613LB, 116500LN White, 126610LN, 116500LN Black, 126610LV, 116610LV, 126334 Blue Diamond Breitling Navitimer 01, Cartier Santos Large |
|
3 December 2018, 12:05 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Long Island
Watch: 500C, BLRO
Posts: 300
|
That’s funny, I find that people with money have it because they are very smart. And people with money tend have a discretionary reserve of no less than around $50K just for things like vacations, theater tickets, sporting events, jewelry, dining, clothing, and other recreations where ROI isn’t a consideration or a concern.
The difference between MSRP + tax and current grey pricing on a BLRO or a 500C is about $8K, and on a SS sport model like a Submariner we are talking $3K. That’s what all the angst is about here. And if that’s a hardship for anyone I’d argue that they shouldn’t even be considering a luxury watch purchase until they have the financial stability to do so. It’s the people stretching every last dollar to get into a brand they can’t actually afford that are lacking smarts, not the ones with enough wealth to be indifferent about spending a premium. |
3 December 2018, 12:17 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Paris
Posts: 3,590
|
Looking at your post history, all you do is discuss the price you paid for your GMT and hoping people will agree with you. Why do you need this kind of validation? I've stumbled upon more people doing this. They got the money to buy whatever they want but are still concerned about the price or pricing strategy.
And there are plenty of dumb people with money. |
3 December 2018, 12:18 AM | #16 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,537
|
Quote:
|
|
3 December 2018, 12:25 AM | #17 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: USA
Watch: All
Posts: 5,316
|
Quote:
Always different perspectives. I know a lot of people with a lot of money. They didn’t acquire it by being frivolous and overpaying and then justifying why they overpaid. This for me is like justifying why ghonerrhea is good for you.
__________________
Rolex 228235 DD40 Olive, 126710BLRO, 116710BLNR, 116613LB, 116500LN White, 126610LN, 116500LN Black, 126610LV, 116610LV, 126334 Blue Diamond Breitling Navitimer 01, Cartier Santos Large |
|
3 December 2018, 12:29 AM | #18 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: USA
Watch: P-01
Posts: 11,772
|
The premium is basically the premium paid for time and access.
Most people dont have access unless they buy a lot of watches where the AD has made a lot of money on you. So there is nothing wrong with paying a premium. |
3 December 2018, 12:31 AM | #19 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,511
|
Quote:
|
|
3 December 2018, 12:35 AM | #20 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Long Island
Watch: 500C, BLRO
Posts: 300
|
Quote:
We are not seeking any validation either. I’m extremely comfortable with the decisions I made. What I am doing is pointing out the other side of the argument; that we’re really not talking about a lot of “extra“ money here. For the privilege of being treated well by a dealer and not waiting a year or more for a desirable Rolex, $2K on most references and $8K on the absolute hottest references is all we’re talking about here. Quote:
|
||
3 December 2018, 12:37 AM | #21 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: The Mystro ;)
Location: Central Pa.
Posts: 15,511
|
Quote:
|
|
3 December 2018, 12:56 AM | #22 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Long Island
Watch: 500C, BLRO
Posts: 300
|
Quote:
Isn't that exactly what everyone wants from their AD? |
|
3 December 2018, 12:59 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 537
|
Problems with paying above MSRP-
-insuring an item for declared value is more difficult and costly- anybody insure their $9k BLRO for $18k? -perpetuates inflated pricing, limited availability, and obnoxious retailer behavior (e.g., bundling) by incentivizing opportunistic flipping. |
3 December 2018, 01:01 AM | #24 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,016
|
Interesting approach - by taking MSRP and adding sales tax - then comparing it to inflated grey market prices for BNIB, you would feel that a 22,000 Daytona 500 is “only” 60%-ish over MSRP instead of 75%-ish over MSRP. If that slakes one’s lust and “FOMO misery index”, then good deal for them.
The only item I’d challenge is the state of play regarding online sellers and sales tax. In States that have enacted the tax again after the Supreme Court decision (and if the grey seller is in that State) then it is due from the seller. Whether they bother to collect it, or even report their sales, is up to them. As for me, I will not pay the hyped price - but I don’t disrespect those who do. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
3 December 2018, 01:01 AM | #25 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,097
|
If paying over MRSP for a watch works for some and they can obtain a reference they want through a gray for what is affordable to them, then to each their own.
My AD has always treated me fairly and that’s why I continue to support them |
3 December 2018, 01:03 AM | #26 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: USA
Watch: All
Posts: 5,316
|
Quote:
All for just $8K more, for what is just an object that not only you can live without, and there is an infinite world of other comparable choices. This thread and the other similar ones to it remind me of an old joke, that I believe everything I read. I write it down, I read it, and I believe it. In the end, it truly is all about what makes you happy and all do with their hard earned money as they wish. That said, hard to argue that this is not another “I wrote it, I read it, I believe it” attempt.
__________________
Rolex 228235 DD40 Olive, 126710BLRO, 116710BLNR, 116613LB, 116500LN White, 126610LN, 116500LN Black, 126610LV, 116610LV, 126334 Blue Diamond Breitling Navitimer 01, Cartier Santos Large |
|
3 December 2018, 01:05 AM | #27 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: USA
Watch: All
Posts: 5,316
|
Quote:
Paid MSRP and it is insured for $18,500. Cost me $50 for the appraisal to do so. While I don’t support paying over MSRP, I am pragmatic and realize should something happen to my BLRO, won’t be seeing another one at MSRP any time soon. Grey will be my likely route, but thanks to insurance and not my pocket.
__________________
Rolex 228235 DD40 Olive, 126710BLRO, 116710BLNR, 116613LB, 116500LN White, 126610LN, 116500LN Black, 126610LV, 116610LV, 126334 Blue Diamond Breitling Navitimer 01, Cartier Santos Large |
|
3 December 2018, 01:12 AM | #28 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Long Island
Watch: 500C, BLRO
Posts: 300
|
Quote:
Quote:
If I had an AD that could tell me with a straight face that they'd get me a Daytona or a Pepsi within 6 months I'd have bought one from them, I think any rational person would. |
||
3 December 2018, 01:23 AM | #29 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,097
|
Quote:
I’m simply saying if you prefer to buy gray vs AD and pay the price, to each their own |
|
3 December 2018, 01:35 AM | #30 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Long Island
Watch: 500C, BLRO
Posts: 300
|
Quote:
The BLRO was the one and only watch I wanted, and no other Rolex or other brand was going to be satisfactory. I never liked the old aluminum Pepsi and the ceramic's dynamic and professional red and blue struck a chord and I had to have it even if it meant overpaying. Some would call that being a 'passionate enthusiast' which is exactly what I am. The cliche of "justification" doesn't apply to people who have the $2K to $8K it takes to buy their way out of the AD favoritism game. To many of us it's not a number that moves the needle. It's not like I dropped $2.5M on a house in a bad neighborhood or invested $3.5M in a weak stock. It's $2K to $8K. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.