The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 17 January 2009, 12:42 PM   #1
jowie4
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Jowie
Location: FL and Manila
Posts: 51
Pam 88 or 90??

Looking into purchasing my first PAM. What's the better value and look for the money a 88 or a 90??

Thanks guys
jowie4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2009, 12:44 PM   #2
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
Both pretty equal in terms to holding their value. Both current production lines, not hard to get. Just buy what sings to you.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2009, 12:49 PM   #3
Latrodectus
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Latrodectus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Fred
Location: KY, USA
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 10,043
I go by the looks and like the 88 better
__________________

Member # 16057
4-Hands Club
Tosser Club Member
TRF Skypers Group
Latrodectus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2009, 01:14 PM   #4
Launch Mini
"TRF" Member
 
Launch Mini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Canada, eh
Watch: can I?
Posts: 6,240
For me, the 90.
I have neither, but if I had to choose, would go 90
__________________
Something witty to go here.

Member # 293
Launch Mini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2009, 02:16 PM   #5
TswaneNguni
"TRF" Member
 
TswaneNguni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: .
Watch: Daytonas/Subs/GMTs
Posts: 12,609
90 vs 88.Both very nice and a tough choice.You can also throw in the 104 and 164.

90 ~ I like the power reserve dial,but no the small minute markers
88 ~ Dont like the skeleton hands and the silver second dial

Thats the negatives,but overall both very nice and you cant go wrong with either.

As my first choice I had a look at all of these and liked the 104 the best.Its my first PAM and the one I wear most.
TswaneNguni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2009, 02:20 PM   #6
dman
Lifetime TRF Patron
 
dman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Daren
Location: Austin
Watch: the road
Posts: 13,585
I own neither at the moment but have owned the 88 4 times, LOL. I'm more of a gmt than PR guy so I like the 88. That said my go to Panerai is the 233. Has the PR and gmt. :-)
__________________
You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!!

I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo.
dman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2009, 08:32 PM   #7
Trurolexer
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 5513MaxiI+PreComex
Posts: 18,421
90 is my choice. Look more elegant to me.
Trurolexer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2009, 08:34 PM   #8
tuisquash
"TRF" Member
 
tuisquash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: tui
Location: são paulo-brasil
Watch: panerai rolex
Posts: 772
88
__________________
panerai and rolex
tuisquash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 January 2009, 11:35 PM   #9
Randy
"TRF" Member
 
Randy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
I love my 88!
Randy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2009, 12:32 AM   #10
jowie4
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Jowie
Location: FL and Manila
Posts: 51
I know kinda off topic, but how about both of these compared to a 48? I know it's only a 40 mm, but again in regards to value and rarity where does it stand?
jowie4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2009, 06:30 AM   #11
Nica64
"TRF" Member
 
Nica64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,596
I like both, but I will pick the 90 first I think is more elegant like TR says.
__________________
______________________________
You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again.
Nica64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2009, 09:48 AM   #12
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
LOL! I have an 88 so I'll go with it.

mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2009, 10:10 AM   #13
brainbizz
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 608
The only watch I ever flipped was the 90 due getting a 270. I still have my 88 and wear it occasionally. Some feel the dial is cluttered but i think it works well.
brainbizz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2009, 01:11 PM   #14
bigmikebee
"TRF" Member
 
bigmikebee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 359
pam 90!!!
bigmikebee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 January 2009, 09:09 PM   #15
louie
"TRF" Member
 
louie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Lewis
Location: Earth
Watch: The Beast
Posts: 1,352
X 2!
__________________
" I THINK PERFECTION IS UGLY. SOMEWHERE IN THE THINGS HUMANS MAKE, I WANT TO SEE SCARS, FAILURE, DISORDER AND DISTORTION" - YOHJI YAMAMOTO
louie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2009, 02:47 AM   #16
jgk200
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Jeff
Location: columbus, oh
Watch: PAM 321
Posts: 76
go with the one you like... for me it was....
Attached Images
 
jgk200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2009, 03:01 PM   #17
wcl884
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 353
I was deciding between PAM90 and 88 a while back, but decided to buy neither. I got some good advice from another Panerai forum:
PAM 90 - looks great, very clean and stylish, but what's the point of a power reserve that's only 40 hours?
PAM 88 - looks too busy with the minute marker
Both of these have higher production volume (relatively speaking within Panerai) and the beauty of owning a PAM is the limited volume.

Eventually I went with PAM 161 (Ti/SS Bracelet) - but it was $2K more than PAM88

If you are looking for a GMT, I would suggest looking at pre-owned PAM 161 or current PAM 297. You have to look hard, but good value can be had at the OTHER Panerai forum's collector's market. Pre-owned should give you the best value since the initial "hit" has been taken by the first owner. Just make sure you are (as many TRFers have said) "buying the seller"

While we are at it - how about Rolex GMTII-C? I think it's a good value for a good watch.
wcl884 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2009, 04:01 PM   #18
dman
Lifetime TRF Patron
 
dman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Daren
Location: Austin
Watch: the road
Posts: 13,585
Good call on the 161, with the buyers market I know of one on TZ at a steal of a price from a good seller.
__________________
You either get it or you don't, if you have to ask, YOU DON'T!!

I really hope that midget cop doesn't find me in Kokomo.
dman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 January 2009, 11:17 PM   #19
Lol-x
Facilitator
 
Lol-x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Real Name: Steve
Location: Omnipresent
Posts: 33,587
It is for me hard to say, but I do like titanium. I would suggest that you give a titanium model a try on if you get the chance, I just think they wear so well on the wrist.
__________________

Most folks are about as happy as they make up their minds to be. ~Abraham Lincoln
Nothing compares to the simple pleasure of a bike ride. ~John F. Kennedy

ROLEXploitation - yeah I'm a victim
Lol-x is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.