The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 14 January 2019, 07:32 AM   #1
Malren
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 60
15500 affecting 15400 value

Hey,

Thought it might be nice to have a special thread regarding this topic.
What do you guys think? Increase/Decrease?

Are there any similar situations from the past to learn from?
Malren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 07:38 AM   #2
Tschyvon
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Switzerland
Watch: RO41, BLNR, LV,...
Posts: 60
Since 15500 will push MSRP up by around 10%, close to 20k, I won’t see any reason for decrease. Why would it?
Tschyvon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 07:50 AM   #3
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malren View Post
Hey,

Thought it might be nice to have a special thread regarding this topic.
What do you guys think? Increase/Decrease?

Are there any similar situations from the past to learn from?
What actions are you planning to take - depending on the price direction - if any?
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 08:10 AM   #4
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tschyvon View Post
Since 15500 will push MSRP up by around 10%, close to 20k, I won’t see any reason for decrease. Why would it?
I agree. You also have the differentiation between dials. White/silver is gone and blue/grey look slightly different. The 116500 helped the 116520 dramatically. Not the same but just saying.
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 08:13 AM   #5
singe89
"TRF" Member
 
singe89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,747
Well if this is any indication...



White still looks about mid $18 NIB
singe89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 08:27 AM   #6
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
^^ That is insane!
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 08:58 AM   #7
walds11
"TRF" Member
 
walds11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
^^^Yes it is. WatchBox has one listed for $27,950.
__________________
Adam
walds11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 09:00 AM   #8
ukbbc
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Singapore
Posts: 72
It may depend if the Grey dealers decide to play the same game with Rolex Sport models - I.e. Snap up all the ROs while they can and slap a massive premium in anticipation of limited availability from manufacturer.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ukbbc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 09:00 AM   #9
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
Greys will always look for a reason to raise prices, never lower, only massive selling pressure will force them to and I don't see that happening here at all.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 09:03 AM   #10
Malren
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 60
Quote:
Originally Posted by walds11 View Post
^^^Yes it is. WatchBox has one listed for $27,950.
Listing is nice but are there any buyers willing to pay??
Malren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 09:17 AM   #11
walds11
"TRF" Member
 
walds11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
Quote:
Originally Posted by Malren View Post
Listing is nice but are there any buyers willing to pay??
Doubt it. That one has been for sale for at least a few weeks.
__________________
Adam
walds11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 09:20 AM   #12
mustangtornado
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Dallas/Palm Beach
Posts: 149
Bottom line, 15500 not wildly superior. So...with no more 15400s being produced, everyone that prefers the look of the 15400s are going after increasingly limited supplies. price=up. Eco 101.
mustangtornado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 09:38 AM   #13
mobster600
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Yes
Posts: 1,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by singe89 View Post
Well if this is any indication...



White still looks about mid $18 NIB

I wouldn’t use Takuya as a average price point. He has always been MUCH higher then other sellers. He does have a good inventory and trusted but your paying up for it.
mobster600 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 09:44 AM   #14
Baco Noir
"TRF" Member
 
Baco Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,974
15500 has some issues IMHO:
1) date window pushed out to the far edge
2) no text on the bottom half of the dial makes it look unbalanced
3) shorter, wider minute markers also though off the dial proportions.

All these things make the 15400 more desirable IMHO.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 126619LB, 116710BLNR, and 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster and Planet Ocean 42; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Nomos Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & SuperOcean 44; Doxa 300 Pro Carbon; Stowa Limette; Laco Napa Flieger; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too
Baco Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 09:47 AM   #15
HarryLime
"TRF" Member
 
HarryLime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
IMO 1 and 2 are what draw me to the 15500
HarryLime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 10:07 AM   #16
lhawli
"TRF" Member
 
lhawli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baco Noir View Post
15500 has some issues IMHO:
1) date window pushed out to the far edge
2) no text on the bottom half of the dial makes it look unbalanced
3) shorter, wider minute markers also though off the dial proportions.

All these things make the 15400 more desirable IMHO.

4) The minute track is now on the outside breaking up the balance of the dial.
5) Thicker case
6) Still 50 M water resistance

The 15500 is like what Rolex did with the DJII.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01]
Rolex DateJust 41 [126334]
Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV]
Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR]
Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN]
lhawli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 10:15 AM   #17
masterserg
"TRF" Member
 
masterserg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Serg
Location: US of A
Watch: AP
Posts: 7,437
I like the fatter hands / lume on the 15500. Blue looks darker though. The electric blue of the 400 is hard to top.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat yer meat????
masterserg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 10:29 AM   #18
T3F
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 457
Looks like opinions are pretty split on preference for the 15400 vs 15500, which means that values for the 15400 with do just fine. I'd have to see the 15500 in person to make a final decision of which I like better, but my first impression is that I like the 15400's dial layout much better, but the new movement in the 15500 appears to be a significant improvement -- overall, I think I still prefer the 15400.

Also, as a 15400 blue dial owner, $27k+ for one seems a but ridiculous -- I seriously doubt anyone is going to pay that, but I hope they do, as it's good for me if I decide to sell mine!
__________________
Instagram: @watchadmiral
T3F is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 11:57 AM   #19
GB-man
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GB-man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,355
This is just like every other release. Current owners like their watch and people on the sidelines get excited about the new one
__________________
GB-man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 12:02 PM   #20
Gh0st0
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Midwest
Posts: 136
Subtle differences, which is good for both watches
Gh0st0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 12:07 PM   #21
Plai
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Toronto
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
This is just like every other release. Current owners like their watch and people on the sidelines get excited about the new one
I agree with you. Obvious bias and self interest going on. I prefer the 15500 more, and the blue looks more rich than the 15400. Just wish it was 39 or 40mm instead.
Plai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 12:12 PM   #22
jtsmith439
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Paradise
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baco Noir View Post
15500 has some issues IMHO:
1) date window pushed out to the far edge
2) no text on the bottom half of the dial makes it look unbalanced
3) shorter, wider minute markers also though off the dial proportions.

All these things make the 15400 more desirable IMHO.

Hard to be objective if you own a 15400. Both are great watches.
jtsmith439 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 12:45 PM   #23
appa666
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: CN&CA
Posts: 146
I like everything on 15500 excepts thickness.
I assume depends on how sensitive you are about thickness, but i am sure people who really care about thickness>the number of 15400 available in the market, plus silver dial is currently not available on 15500, at least for now. Therefore there is a shortage so price should go up.
appa666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 02:00 PM   #24
yessir69
2024 Pledge Member
 
yessir69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Tornado Alley
Posts: 3,289
I remember when the 400s came out. The 300s disappeared pretty quickly and they’ve gone up in value steadily over the years. I don’t see why the same thing wouldn’t happen now.
yessir69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 02:03 PM   #25
vman
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,230
15500—serious design issue with the date being pushed out by so much. Pass.
__________________
Collector and buyer of Lange, VC, Patek | 2 FA Enabled
vman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 03:09 PM   #26
Baco Noir
"TRF" Member
 
Baco Noir's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Roger
Location: Colorado
Watch: this ya'll
Posts: 4,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by jtsmith439 View Post
Hard to be objective if you own a 15400. Both are great watches.


Not true. Have you ever owned a watch and then a new edition came out and decided to “upgrade”?

I just prefer to 15400 over the 15500.
__________________
Current Collection: Rolex 126619LB, 116710BLNR, and 216570 polar Explorer II; Omega Apollo 8 Speedmaster and Planet Ocean 42; Tudor BB Bronze Bucherer Blue Edition; Nomos Neomatik 42; Breitling Aerospace, Avenger Blackbird, & SuperOcean 44; Doxa 300 Pro Carbon; Stowa Limette; Laco Napa Flieger; Mickey Mouse Timex Electric; and dare I say it...an Apple Watch too
Baco Noir is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 05:12 PM   #27
HarryLime
"TRF" Member
 
HarryLime's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: NY
Posts: 676
Quote:
Originally Posted by vman View Post
15500—serious design issue with the date being pushed out by so much. Pass.
Strongly disagree. The half marker at 3pm on the 15400 is more of a design issue to me.
HarryLime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 05:54 PM   #28
ericksakti
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: indonesia
Posts: 77
I really like new movement, finally a movement that fits the 41mm case size, the previous movement was too small compared to the case size and makes me feel that the date placement is forced, which refrain me from buying 15400st in the first place, looking at the 15500st in slate grey I think the color looks very similar to the ruthenium, I'm considering on getting this piece.
ericksakti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 05:59 PM   #29
sdh1980
"TRF" Member
 
sdh1980's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: London
Watch: 116500 LN
Posts: 361
.
__________________
Instagram - SDH1980
sdh1980 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 January 2019, 06:29 PM   #30
Starwalker
"TRF" Member
 
Starwalker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: aroundtheworld
Watch: SS Daytona - BLACK
Posts: 2,261
Quote:
Originally Posted by sdh1980 View Post
15500 now disappeared from the website.... weird
its still there.
__________________
116520 Black - 116500 White - 116713LN - 116613LB - Panerai 389 - Chopard Mille Miglia GMT Chronograph - Chopard LUC Sport 2000 - Moser Pioneer Centre Seconds
Starwalker is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.