ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Wizardly · 25 February 2019, 08:43 AM

I know the parameters of the Rolex Superlative Chrono is -2 - +2. My new Submariner is .58 of a second behind per day. Now, I am thrilled and I know it's awesome for any watch, but my question is, is this above-average awesomeness for a new Rolex watch, or just about average awesomeness?

(I measured this over 96 hours manually, checking against 'time.is'.)

ReclinerTimer · 25 February 2019, 08:49 AM

Yes, this is absolutely outstanding timekeeping. Don't get me wrong, I think you would in general be hard pressed to find a perfectly serviced Rolex doing anything worse than +/- 5, so they are all fantastic but .58 is great. My 1979 datejust is only losing about half a second per day as well after being served in 2017. Truly amazing

Wizardly · 25 February 2019, 10:15 PM

Check that... I rested it face-down last night and I don't know if the power reserve is running low, but it picked up about 3/4 of a second and is now (after close to 5 days) running 1.25 secs behind... so that's about .25 loss per day. Insane.

Gaining 3/4 sec overnight is puzzling though. I'm no expert, but I've heard that when the reserve is low, the watch will actually run faster. Don't know if it's that (didn't wear it much at all the day before) or if resting dial down is the reason.

Mystro · 25 February 2019, 10:26 PM

It’s very good but there’re are even better out their. My CHNR will do +1 second a month.
All my new Rolex models will do better than +2 /-2 a day.

nigelUK · 25 February 2019, 10:33 PM

I think it's more average anal retention

Most of us have it to a greater or lesser degree . . .

Wizardly · 25 February 2019, 10:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nigelUK

I think it's more average anal retention

Most of us have it to a greater or lesser degree . . .

Yes for sure, but playing the timing game is part of the fun for me.

t65tampa · 26 February 2019, 03:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystro

It’s very good but there’re are even better out their. My CHNR will do +1 second a month.
All my new Rolex models will do better than +2 /-2 a day.

I've had similar luck with the 4 new models I've picked up in the last year - they are all running between +1/-1 a day when I time them out for a few weeks. Pretty amazing actually.

Mystro · 26 February 2019, 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by t65tampa

I've had similar luck with the 4 new models I've picked up in the last year - they are all running between +1/-1 a day when I time them out for a few weeks. Pretty amazing actually.

30 years with Rolex. I can certainly see Rolex is making a great effort with their new standards of accuracy.

Brny11 · 25 February 2019, 10:37 PM

That is excellent results!!

Give your watch some time and get to know it’s variances. It is my understanding that +-2 seconds is based on multiple positional tests. For example some complain that their watch losses 5 seconds a day on the wrist. But at night when the watch is laying with the dial up, it gains 3.5 seconds. Combined, that watch is well within Rolex standards.

Personally, I hardly pay attention anymore. When I used to, I knew how to self regulate based on position of the watch on the dresser.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

tyler1980 · 25 February 2019, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wizardly

I know the parameters of the Rolex Superlative Chrono is -2 - +2. My new Submariner is .58 of a second behind per day. Now, I am thrilled and I know it's awesome for any watch, but my question is, is this above-average awesomeness for a new Rolex watch, or just about average awesomeness?

(I measured this over 96 hours manually, checking against 'time.is'.)

superlative awesomeness... its being added to the dial next year

Wizardly · 25 February 2019, 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tyler1980

superlative awesomeness... its being added to the dial next year

Yes, the '5-line' Sub.

padi56 · 25 February 2019, 11:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wizardly

I know the parameters of the Rolex Superlative Chrono is -2 - +2. My new Submariner is .58 of a second behind per day. Now, I am thrilled and I know it's awesome for any watch, but my question is, is this above-average awesomeness for a new Rolex watch, or just about average awesomeness?

(I measured this over 96 hours manually, checking against 'time.is'.)

First the wording Superlative Chronometer has been on Rolex dials for 40 years way before this new spec.And IMHO many of you guys have far to much time on your hands.But I will join the brag factor last time I checked my 5513 was April 1st 1989, just checked it now and its .099999999987 of a second fast in almost 30 years beat that one.

Wizardly · 25 February 2019, 11:36 PM

Per post #3, (Gaining back 3/4 sec overnight) I'll pose it in a question: (Just getting to know this watch.)

When power reserve runs low does the movement speed up? My watch was also stored after a full days rest, dial down. Thoughts?

tudorbaja27 · 26 February 2019, 12:30 AM

ARRRRRRGHHHHH

Mystro · 26 February 2019, 12:39 AM

This IS a watch forum. I am curious what do most expect to talk about here??

Wizardly · 26 February 2019, 01:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystro

This IS a watch forum. I am curious what do most expect to talk about here??

+1

tyler1980 · 26 February 2019, 03:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mystro

This IS a watch forum. I am curious what do most expect to talk about here??

investments

capote · 27 February 2019, 04:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tyler1980

investments

And Rolex stategy...

ilovethiscity · 26 February 2019, 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mystro

this is a watch forum. I am curious what do most expect to talk about here??

+2!

shaunylw · 26 February 2019, 03:17 AM

I have a timegrapher and I almost never check my personal watches. I imagine I am right around 1 second per day on a recently serviced 16570. I have had many watches at near 0 seconds a month. For me, a min a month or so is fine. It will take me 3-4 months to even notice.

Wizardly · 27 February 2019, 02:39 AM

Obsessive Compulsive Update: (Because I know you are just dying to know):

If I rest this gorgeous piece of mechanical wonderousness face-down at night it picks up some time. (Did this twice so far.) So now, I'm only a half second out after 6 plus days. Just about .10 behind.

Stayed tuned for more thrilling updates.

enjoythemusic · 27 February 2019, 02:41 AM

SS SkyD blue... +5 seconds a month.

JacksonStone · 27 February 2019, 03:44 AM

My 3150 SubC is within +1 spd. Since I eyeball the time against time.gov, I can't get more exact on the number, but I'm happy.

Junior_ · 27 February 2019, 04:23 AM

Over the last month, my 114060 is fast by 0.5429 seconds per day.

That's checking and adjusting once a week.

WatchGuy1966 · 27 February 2019, 04:59 AM

116710LN +.05 SPD
214270 +1.5 SPD
Tudor GMT +0.7 SPD

Fantastic!

Brew · 27 February 2019, 05:21 AM

I'm afraid to check. Ignorance is bliss.

25 February 2019, 08:43 AM	#1
Wizardly "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Real Name: Ernie Location: Los Angeles Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 271	My Superlative Chronometer is .58 seconds... I know the parameters of the Rolex Superlative Chrono is -2 - +2. My new Submariner is .58 of a second behind per day. Now, I am thrilled and I know it's awesome for any watch, but my question is, is this above-average awesomeness for a new Rolex watch, or just about average awesomeness? (I measured this over 96 hours manually, checking against 'time.is'.)

25 February 2019, 10:33 PM	#5
nigelUK "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Location: Northants, UK Posts: 1,058	I think it's more average anal retention Most of us have it to a greater or lesser degree . . . __________________ insta : NigelUK

26 February 2019, 12:30 AM	#14
tudorbaja27 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2017 Location: Miami, FL Watch: Tudor & Cartier Posts: 2,499	ARRRRRRGHHHHH __________________ "Chi ha paura muore ogni giorno, chi non ha paura muore una volta sola" - Paolo Borsellino

27 February 2019, 02:41 AM	#22
enjoythemusic 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Real Name: Steven Location: Glocal Posts: 21,194	SS SkyD blue... +5 seconds a month. __________________ __________________ ----> Was Great Seeing Everyone At The TRF December 9 Tampa Meetup <---- https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=968133 Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school. www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/ Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

25 February 2019, 08:49 AM	#2
ReclinerTimer "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: florida Posts: 146	Yes, this is absolutely outstanding timekeeping. Don't get me wrong, I think you would in general be hard pressed to find a perfectly serviced Rolex doing anything worse than +/- 5, so they are all fantastic but .58 is great. My 1979 datejust is only losing about half a second per day as well after being served in 2017. Truly amazing

25 February 2019, 10:15 PM	#3
Wizardly "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Real Name: Ernie Location: Los Angeles Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 271	Check that... I rested it face-down last night and I don't know if the power reserve is running low, but it picked up about 3/4 of a second and is now (after close to 5 days) running 1.25 secs behind... so that's about .25 loss per day. Insane. Gaining 3/4 sec overnight is puzzling though. I'm no expert, but I've heard that when the reserve is low, the watch will actually run faster. Don't know if it's that (didn't wear it much at all the day before) or if resting dial down is the reason.

25 February 2019, 10:26 PM	#4
Mystro 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: The Mystro ;) Location: Central Pa. Posts: 15,514	It’s very good but there’re are even better out their. My CHNR will do +1 second a month. All my new Rolex models will do better than +2 /-2 a day.

25 February 2019, 10:37 PM	#9
Brny11 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2016 Real Name: Brian Location: Florida Posts: 2,460	That is excellent results!! Give your watch some time and get to know it’s variances. It is my understanding that +-2 seconds is based on multiple positional tests. For example some complain that their watch losses 5 seconds a day on the wrist. But at night when the watch is laying with the dial up, it gains 3.5 seconds. Combined, that watch is well within Rolex standards. Personally, I hardly pay attention anymore. When I used to, I knew how to self regulate based on position of the watch on the dresser. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

25 February 2019, 11:36 PM	#13
Wizardly "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Real Name: Ernie Location: Los Angeles Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 271	Per post #3, (Gaining back 3/4 sec overnight) I'll pose it in a question: (Just getting to know this watch.) When power reserve runs low does the movement speed up? My watch was also stored after a full days rest, dial down. Thoughts?

26 February 2019, 12:39 AM	#15
Mystro 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: The Mystro ;) Location: Central Pa. Posts: 15,514	This IS a watch forum. I am curious what do most expect to talk about here??

26 February 2019, 03:17 AM	#20
shaunylw "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Here Posts: 4,657	I have a timegrapher and I almost never check my personal watches. I imagine I am right around 1 second per day on a recently serviced 16570. I have had many watches at near 0 seconds a month. For me, a min a month or so is fine. It will take me 3-4 months to even notice.

27 February 2019, 02:39 AM	#21
Wizardly "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Real Name: Ernie Location: Los Angeles Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 271	Obsessive Compulsive Update: (Because I know you are just dying to know): If I rest this gorgeous piece of mechanical wonderousness face-down at night it picks up some time. (Did this twice so far.) So now, I'm only a half second out after 6 plus days. Just about .10 behind. Stayed tuned for more thrilling updates.

27 February 2019, 03:44 AM	#23
JacksonStone Banned Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Oregon Posts: 5,150	My 3150 SubC is within +1 spd. Since I eyeball the time against time.gov, I can't get more exact on the number, but I'm happy.

27 February 2019, 04:23 AM	#24
Junior_ "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Real Name: John Location: Ohio Watch: Rolex 114060 Posts: 658	Over the last month, my 114060 is fast by 0.5429 seconds per day. That's checking and adjusting once a week.

27 February 2019, 04:59 AM	#25
WatchGuy1966 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2018 Location: Location Location Posts: 1,794	116710LN +.05 SPD 214270 +1.5 SPD Tudor GMT +0.7 SPD Fantastic!

27 February 2019, 05:21 AM	#26
Brew "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2018 Real Name: Larry Location: Finger Lakes Posts: 6,007	I'm afraid to check. Ignorance is bliss.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)