ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
12 April 2019, 12:53 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 318
|
Does this 1680 look ok?
Close to pulling the trigger on this 1680. 5.7 million serial, seller says it was serviced and case refinished at LAWW. Just wanted to check with you guys and make sure everything looks kosher!
|
12 April 2019, 01:38 PM | #2 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Webmaster
Location: Space
Watch: it pal !
Posts: 2,956
|
Not for nothing, but if it was just serviced by LAWW he or she should have an invoice.
__________________
" Even I don't wake up looking like Cindy Crawford". Cindy Crawford Hypochondria is the only disease I haven't got RIP Mikey |
12 April 2019, 05:07 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Paris
Posts: 73
|
There are service parts : dial (so-called mk4), insert, date disk, and probably the crown
__________________
Submariner 1680 Tiffany / Submariner 14060 / GMT Master II 16710 / GMT Master II 116710 BLNR /// PAM00337 /// Omega DeVille |
13 April 2019, 02:46 AM | #4 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
Is it normal for service dials to patina like this? How does this affect the value of the watch? I know ones with luminova service dials are worth significantly less. Does an aged tritium service dial and replaced date disc also affect the value? I don’t mind service parts, just don’t want to over pay for them :) Thanks! |
|
13 April 2019, 03:13 AM | #5 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,446
|
Quote:
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=513941 And look at the service dial type C. |
|
13 April 2019, 05:53 AM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Paris
Posts: 73
|
Quote:
__________________
Submariner 1680 Tiffany / Submariner 14060 / GMT Master II 16710 / GMT Master II 116710 BLNR /// PAM00337 /// Omega DeVille |
|
13 April 2019, 09:59 AM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
Are those really open 6's ? To me they look closed, although maybe a better pic would tell. Very subtle-- this has a patina more like an original dial. EDIT NVM I see it now. They are fat sixes as much as "open" and the MK1 sixes are longer and skinnier. sort of. |
|
13 April 2019, 05:51 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,205
|
^ plus look at the Superlative Chronometer Official Certified lines the spacing between the lines is much narrower on the service dial (as on OP's watch) than the Mk11 and there are also noticeable differences between letter spacing. The Service dial also has T<25 touching the minute markers whereas a Mk11 has a gap.
|
14 April 2019, 05:55 AM | #9 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 318
|
Thanks for all the info guys. The dial differences are really subtle! I noticed the T<25 touching the markers but the font differences are much harder for me to see. Always a great wealth of info on here!
Unfortunately I may have to pass on this one. I asked the seller for a picture of the LAWW service invoice to verify what has been done and for whatever reason they are refusing to provide it before purchase... |
15 April 2019, 07:40 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: USA
Posts: 318
|
How about this one? Looks like a mark 2 dial.
I think the case may have had a light polish but still looks thick. Is that crystal a service replacement (with the larger bevel)? |
15 April 2019, 07:55 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,660
|
Service insert on that one for sure
|
15 April 2019, 09:59 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NYC
Posts: 3,506
|
It’s just so-so ... looks like a service replacement crystal. If the watch is that worn the acrylic would have wear too. The insert and cuff polish don’t do it for me.
|
1 June 2019, 01:16 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 389
|
Hi there,
Far far far from being an expert but this is what I see: Dial looks like a Mk2 but I think the coronet shape is a bit strange. Expert needed there :) Insert looks like a service one (very thin numbers) in very poor condition Datewheel I can't tell 702 crown which is probably period correct (depending on the serial number) Lugs look Thick enough, far from a perfect example but still ok considering the age of this old lady. Do you have the Serial Number ? Regards, |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.