The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 March 2009, 12:37 AM   #1
langdalematt
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: London
Watch: Rolex Deepsea
Posts: 81
Must read this good news or bad?



I have just had some very important information given to me. I have been told the following:

1). Rolex UK price increase end of April 6%

2). I have also been told that the new sub date in indeed to be a ceramic bezel. It will also be, (wait for it) a 43mm watch. It will also have the old style deployment and not the new Glidelock strap.

I cannot confirm these as definite, but I have a very good source who I cannot name.

Enjoy and debate.
langdalematt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 12:39 AM   #2
langdalematt
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: London
Watch: Rolex Deepsea
Posts: 81
Forgot Also To Add

Apparently there is also going to be an extraordinary price increase on the GMTII Ceramic. In the UK will be well over 5k GBP. God knows what this will be in the US as I do not know.
langdalematt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 12:40 AM   #3
rkb
"TRF" Member
 
rkb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Russell
Location: Seattle Metro
Watch: EXPORER II
Posts: 605
Polished center link? Please tell me no.
__________________
http://www.rolexforums.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=21435&dateline=123618  1128
rkb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 12:47 AM   #4
AJF
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Ally
Location: Surrey (UK)
Watch: 15223
Posts: 638
Well if true, that will rule out anyone buying the new sub with wrists less than 8 inches.

I had a feeling that they would go supersize on the case. Would not be surprised if they increase the depth rating as well.

AJF.
AJF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 12:52 AM   #5
rolexgiants
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 2,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJF View Post
Well if true, that will rule out anyone buying the new sub with wrists less than 8 inches.

I had a feeling that they would go supersize on the case. Would not be surprised if they increase the depth rating as well.

AJF.
my wirst is 7.... and the deepsea fits very well....
rolexgiants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 12:54 AM   #6
STEELINOX
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
STEELINOX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,021
Yawners !

!
STEELINOX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 12:55 AM   #7
rolexgiants
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 2,903
are u saying that the ss version will come out this year??? what about the new tt sub???
rolexgiants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 01:18 AM   #8
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by langdalematt View Post

I have just had some very important information given to me. I have been told the following:

1). Rolex UK price increase end of April 6%

2). I have also been told that the new sub date in indeed to be a ceramic bezel. It will also be, (wait for it) a 43mm watch. It will also have the old style deployment and not the new Glidelock strap.

I cannot confirm these as definite, but I have a very good source who I cannot name.

Enjoy and debate.
This is amazing news - but I think a 43 mm Sub will be a gross watch. That case size is way to big. Such a shame that the Sub will loose its classic proportions. Bad move Rolex.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 01:20 AM   #9
chenx15
"TRF" Member
 
chenx15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 2,891
i don't think they will touch the ss sub. it already sells the way it is. if they increase the size it's like killing the dssd
__________________
16 GS Titles
16 AMS titles (1 short of Agassi)
23 Consecutive GS semifinals
17/18 of the last GS finals, 237 consecutive weeks #1
5 consecutive wimbledon + 1 = 6 cups
5 consecutive US open
4 Australian open
1 Sweet french open
a crown for every achievement
The Greatest Of All Time loves Rolex
chenx15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 01:20 AM   #10
AJF
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Ally
Location: Surrey (UK)
Watch: 15223
Posts: 638
We will all find out in less than three weeks.

On a serious note, I for one would be disappointed if they do supersize the watch case. I don't agree with the new DDII and if the rumours are to be believed a 41mm DJII, is in the offing

Subs, DD and DJ's are design classics and iconic Rolex watches. IMHO it is a mistake to mess around with a tried and tested formula.

AJF.
AJF is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 01:21 AM   #11
Rebel
"TRF" Member
 
Rebel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Dr Mark R Nail
Location: New Albany
Watch: Tudor Sub 75090
Posts: 8,257
I'll be going vintage.
__________________
-------------------------------
Member of the Nylon Nation
Rebel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 01:26 AM   #12
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
Why on earth would they up the Sub Date to 43mm, that would render the WG and YG Subs wholly pointless something doesn't add up here.
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 01:28 AM   #13
Quicksilver
"TRF" Member
 
Quicksilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: David
Location: London+Guangzhou
Watch: ing watches
Posts: 2,603
Quote:
Originally Posted by The GMT Master View Post
Why on earth would they up the Sub Date to 43mm, that would render the WG and YG Subs wholly pointless something doesn't add up here.
Perhaps they will offer a 43 mm Sub and a 40 mm ? Seems crazy though - it will kill the DSSD stone dead unless a decision has already been made to kill it.
__________________
Rolex Sea Dweller 116600, GMT Master II 16710 (Pepsi) and 116710 BLNR, Daytona 116500LN, Submariner 14060M.
Quicksilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 01:32 AM   #14
Solar
"TRF" Member
 
Solar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
We really just have to wait 'till April!

Hard to say, easy to speculate based on past products. I can really see the Sub going 43 mm to meet the consumer demand for bigger-cased watches.

I figure if the past is any indication, the Sub this April will be TT with cerachrom bezel, Glidelock, Parachrom etc etc.

Next year the SS Sub will go the way of the GMT IIc

I think.

Only Rolex knows.

Best,
C
Solar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 01:35 AM   #15
The GMT Master
"TRF" Member
 
The GMT Master's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quicksilver View Post
Perhaps they will offer a 43 mm Sub and a 40 mm ? Seems crazy though - it will kill the DSSD stone dead unless a decision has already been made to kill it.
I can't see that happening really, unless they do away with the ND Sub.
The GMT Master is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 01:51 AM   #16
langdalematt
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: London
Watch: Rolex Deepsea
Posts: 81
i only had a few minutes with the chap on the phone. I will do some more digging next time I speak to him
langdalematt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 02:04 AM   #17
Randy
"TRF" Member
 
Randy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Real Name: Randy
Location: Ohio
Watch: AP, Rolex, Panerai
Posts: 1,241
Quote:
Originally Posted by langdalematt View Post
i only had a few minutes with the chap on the phone. I will do some more digging next time I speak to him
Thanks for the info Mark
Randy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 02:12 AM   #18
SirLoki
"TRF" Member
 
SirLoki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Fullerton, CA
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 916
im not surprised on the bezel, they will probably use the same bezel from the DSSD on the new sub.
__________________
16710N Y 116710LN M 116400 V 116660 V

RIP JJ

Quote:
Originally Posted by JJ Irani View Post
The best bastidization I've ever seen on TRF!!
SirLoki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 02:15 AM   #19
rolexgiants
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: new york, usa
Posts: 2,903
Quote:
Originally Posted by chenx15 View Post
i don't think they will touch the ss sub. it already sells the way it is. if they increase the size it's like killing the dssd
great point!!!! i agree with you..... the deep sea is already in the tank.. lol
rolexgiants is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 02:31 AM   #20
ronintt
"TRF" Member
 
ronintt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Garden of England
Posts: 107
Surprised no one has mentioned the price hike - shocking and only moments after the last 2.

£5k for a SS GMT c - glad i got mine what now seems back in the cheap days!
__________________
Rolex Daytona white face 116520 V2 Serial, Rolex GMT II C 116710 LN M serial, IWC Aquatimer Titanium IW353803, Panerai PAM 00090 (far too many straps too list!), Omega Seamaster Professional 2531.80.00, Bvlgari Diagono Aluminium AL44TAVD-SLN
ronintt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 02:33 AM   #21
WatchTimes
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
 
WatchTimes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: JYogi/Jeremy
Location: Metro Detroit USA
Watch: It's a Rolex!
Posts: 5,787
I am sure it will be a ceramic bezel but
it wont be 43 mm.
It will be the same size and case as the GMT IIC

If it was going to be like the DSSD the WG version would already be done
They would not put the WG in the GMT IIC case and the ss in a 43 mm case.
They would not have redone the WG/YG version simply for one year either...

Soooo tired of "I have it from a good source".....
Logic doesn't even support your claim.
__________________
"You won't rise to the occasion - you'll default to your level of training." Barrett Tillman

Kentucky Colonel, Tennessee Squire & Combat Leprechaun
WatchTimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 02:49 AM   #22
brettpaul
"TRF" Member
 
brettpaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
Great intel Mark - thanks for keeping us posted!
brettpaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 02:50 AM   #23
mic6
"TRF" Member
 
mic6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Watch: 116718 green
Posts: 1,944
The new sub has already been introduced last year and it is 40mm
I guess your source is not very reliable
__________________
mic6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 02:57 AM   #24
Ogie
"TRF" Member
 
Ogie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chicago
Watch: Rolex SS Sub 16610
Posts: 110
Quote:
Originally Posted by langdalematt View Post

I have just had some very important information given to me. I have been told the following:

1). Rolex UK price increase end of April 6%

2). I have also been told that the new sub date in indeed to be a ceramic bezel. It will also be, (wait for it) a 43mm watch. It will also have the old style deployment and not the new Glidelock strap.

I cannot confirm these as definite, but I have a very good source who I cannot name.

Enjoy and debate.
The Ceramic bezel YES. I dont think it will be 43mm and have the old style deployment. We will wait and see...
Ogie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 03:04 AM   #25
Mthwatch
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Michael
Location: Richmond, VA
Watch: Panerai 000
Posts: 144
There's no way this could be accurate. It has become clear that the only substantial changes that we will see have ALREADY been released on other models. Notably - the new case with wider lugs, the ceramic bezel and the new clasp with glidelock. There is no way they will suddenly produce a 43mm SS sub with the old style clasp while there already exists a 40mm Gold Sub with a glidelock clasp. That makes no sense at all.
Mthwatch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 03:06 AM   #26
BGRINDEL
"TRF" Member
 
BGRINDEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Arizona
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by JYogi View Post
I am sure it will be a ceramic bezel but
it wont be 43 mm.
It will be the same size and case as the GMT IIC

If it was going to be like the DSSD the WG version would already be done
They would not put the WG in the GMT IIC case and the ss in a 43 mm case.
They would not have redone the WG/YG version simply for one year either...

Soooo tired of "I have it from a good source".....
Logic doesn't even support your claim.
Agree with Yogi 100%!!!! If it was going to 43mm, we would have seen it on the all gold versions.
BGRINDEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 04:25 AM   #27
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
40, 43, 46, 49mm, it doesn't matter.

I'm not laying out £5,000 plus for a mass produced SS Sub.
__________________
..33
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 04:42 AM   #28
Jason71
"TRF" Member
 
Jason71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/Tudor Divers
Posts: 7,973
It does make me happy that I already own the ones that I want.
__________________
Best Regards,
Jason


Just Say "NO" to Polishing
Card-Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch Curmudgeons
LIfe is too short to wear inexpensive watches
PLEXI IS SEXY
Jason71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 04:45 AM   #29
tthopp05
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Watch: THE MIGHTY DEEPSEA
Posts: 839
Thats intresting,the idea of changing the loved 40mm.
tthopp05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2009, 04:48 AM   #30
tthopp05
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NY
Watch: THE MIGHTY DEEPSEA
Posts: 839
Do you think they would give up on the DSSD so fast?Its not even a year.Cant wait to see what they do.
tthopp05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.