ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 January 2020, 01:56 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 140
|
Hand change on a 1680 or 1665 bothered ?
does anyone worry too much about newer hands on vintage Subs & SDs if everything else is original ?
|
4 January 2020, 02:04 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: France
Posts: 58
|
Depends if hands are tritium or service Luminova !
If they are tritium good condition and they match the dial patina for me not a problem ! But a Luminova set is a deal breaker ! Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk |
4 January 2020, 02:19 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,296
|
Different people worry about different things, but it does have a modest effect on value. You can find older tritium hands to replace them if you want to go that route. Personally, I don't like the look of luminova hands with a tritium dial.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
4 January 2020, 03:06 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 140
|
Thanks Dan
I guess a very subjective issue..I have never been too bothered re hands so long as dial ok... |
4 January 2020, 03:34 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,660
|
I hate anything on a vintage watch that glows!
|
4 January 2020, 06:31 AM | #6 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,001
|
|
4 January 2020, 07:16 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Australia
Watch: 14270 14060
Posts: 318
|
I would be bothered by this for sure
|
4 January 2020, 07:31 AM | #8 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,515
|
Quote:
However, the value for vintage examples is in originality, so some seem to think that it is proper for old watches to have ratty and damaged parts. Leave all that to the collectors and the vocal wannabees. Most would, and should, want a proper functioning and well maintained watch to wear. If we do not replace disintegrating hands, or dials, the functionality of the watch is gone. Somebody needs to save and restore these old relics to their former life. If we don't do it, who will?
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
4 January 2020, 08:45 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,660
|
I’ve had gilts that don’t glow, and all my models from the 70s and 80s do not glow...everything I have owned that glew or glow was replacement parts as far as Rolex goes...so that’s just what I know
|
4 January 2020, 05:14 PM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: london
Posts: 6,157
|
I had an early 16610 taken in a trade which had newer hands and bezel pip. I didn’t keep it very long! Saying that, I looked at a 1680 with service luminova dial and hands and thought it made a great everyday vintage piece, but not at the price asked!
__________________
@imrootbeer7 |
4 January 2020, 09:30 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Mike Wood
Location: Liverpool UK
Watch: Listen & Learn!
Posts: 611
|
Rolex don't mind...it is them that fitted newer hands to vintage watches for years, and generally the owners were delighted that their watches came back from service with hands that glowed in the dark once again!
Seeing a nice vintage gilt dial watch with luminova hands is a bit of a clash, but it may be part of the watch's history, and it can always be remedied by sourcing and fitting a set of old hands (albeit at a cost!!). MW |
6 January 2020, 02:02 AM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 389
|
Regarding the dial/ hands, I like the watch to be as original as it can be: factory original dial and at least matching hands (type of lume and color).
I can understand the attract of a service dial/service hands for a daily watch. What I don’t like at all is a set of hands that do not match the dial (lumi hands on an old tritrium dial). To me it completely kills the esthetic appeal of the watch... Kind Regards, |
6 January 2020, 02:17 AM | #13 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Real Name: Webmaster
Location: Space
Watch: it pal !
Posts: 2,956
|
I agree with Dan. Best answer.
__________________
" Even I don't wake up looking like Cindy Crawford". Cindy Crawford Hypochondria is the only disease I haven't got RIP Mikey |
6 January 2020, 04:47 AM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 7,001
|
Ah, it's all good. We like what we like, for whatever reason. If it's original, I don't mind a little glow on a dial/hands (it'll most likely be faint anyway.) There are some mid-late '60s Rolex models that still glow quite a bit.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.