The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Classifieds > WatchOut!!!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24 January 2020, 05:58 PM   #1
mechta
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Seoul, Korea
Posts: 12
Please HELP checking my new Rolex Submariner

Hey guys,

I just found this forum today and joined.
I've recently got a used submariner 116610LN around my location,
dealer was 100% confident about the authenticity of the watch
but as you know, there are even more replica ones than genuine out there and wanted to get help from you guys checking this and to make sure if there's no problem with mine.
Would you guys please be able to take a sharp look and check ?

Both serial #s on guarantee card and engraving match,
Country code : 888 (looks like Hong Kong)
1st invoice date : Apr. 2013

Thanks!!!
Attached Images
         
mechta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 01:38 AM   #2
GLADIATOR
"TRF" Member
 
GLADIATOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
No red flags to me.
A
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
GLADIATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 02:50 AM   #3
tigey
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Belize
Posts: 271
Its real but the clasp is fake
tigey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 04:25 AM   #4
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigey View Post
Its real but the clasp is fake
I'm not convinced the rest of the watch is genuine. Should have the case back removed to see movement, IMO
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 05:48 AM   #5
GLADIATOR
"TRF" Member
 
GLADIATOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigblu10 View Post
I'm not convinced the rest of the watch is genuine. Should have the case back removed to see movement, IMO
I think externally ok
But not against this too
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
GLADIATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 05:51 AM   #6
Onikage
"TRF" Member
 
Onikage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
I can't elaborate further on what has been said. I'm not 100% confident. Let's say that.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL
( D- Serial #)
ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4
Onikage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 04:57 AM   #7
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
OP please post pics of the warranty card. You may cover up part of the serial #
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 05:21 AM   #8
ThatExplorer
"TRF" Member
 
ThatExplorer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: Cory
Location: US
Watch: 114060
Posts: 652
There’s a few things I don’t like about it but who knows.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
--------------------------------------------------------------
116610-214270-116710-113700-114300-M79380RB-Zodiac GR
ThatExplorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 05:26 AM   #9
Gary Anderson
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Mancheste
Posts: 39
No good.
Gary Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 05:30 AM   #10
antrolexsub
"TRF" Member
 
antrolexsub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 766
There’s nothing wrong with it.
antrolexsub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 05:41 AM   #11
GLADIATOR
"TRF" Member
 
GLADIATOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by antrolexsub View Post
There’s nothing wrong with it.
Agreed
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
GLADIATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 05:46 AM   #12
Gary Anderson
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Mancheste
Posts: 39
Could be a genuine case and bracelet with a fake movement. I'm not commenting.
Gary Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 06:31 AM   #13
Knappo 1307
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Knappo 1307's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary Anderson View Post
Could be a genuine case and bracelet with a fake movement. I'm not commenting.
But you did..
Knappo 1307 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 05:56 AM   #14
snyde
"TRF" Member
 
snyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Austin
Posts: 563
Does the crystal have the crown laser etching ?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
snyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 06:44 AM   #15
antrolexsub
"TRF" Member
 
antrolexsub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Earth
Posts: 766
Quote:
Originally Posted by snyde View Post
Does the crystal have the crown laser etching ?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Means nothing. Some fake laser etchings are done better than the genuine ones.
antrolexsub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 06:09 AM   #16
derekhayden
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Texas
Watch: Tudor BBGMT
Posts: 793
I am no expert but there is no way I would buy the most replicated watch without getting it looked at before hand.

As others have said there are a few things even in my eyes that would have thrown up some flags. Far as the crown laser etching, this has been replicated for many years and is no indication of 100% genuine.
__________________
********************************************
Official 2nd Member of The Poor Man's Rolex Club
********************************************
derekhayden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 07:06 AM   #17
Gary Anderson
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Mancheste
Posts: 39
I'd need to give the watch a feel to make a decision.
Gary Anderson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 07:30 AM   #18
bondtoys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
I don’t like this watch at all!

I don‘t want to imagine, what abuse the watch went thru (if genuine) to get the ceramic inlay damaged like it is!
bondtoys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 07:32 AM   #19
GLADIATOR
"TRF" Member
 
GLADIATOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by bondtoys View Post
I don’t like this watch at all!

I don‘t want to imagine, what abuse the watch went thru (if genuine) to get the ceramic inlay damaged like it is!
What damage to inlay. Looks perfect to me.
Those marks are finger marks.
No scratches or dropout
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
GLADIATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 07:39 AM   #20
Knappo 1307
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Knappo 1307's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by GLADIATOR View Post
What damage to inlay. Looks perfect to me.
Those marks are finger marks.
No scratches or dropout
There appears to be a deep scratch on the ceramic at the 54 mark. Could be a hair, however.
Knappo 1307 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 07:43 AM   #21
GLADIATOR
"TRF" Member
 
GLADIATOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Costa Blanca,
Watch: YMII,GMTII,DAYTONA
Posts: 5,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Knappo 1307 View Post
There appears to be a deep scratch on the ceramic at the 54 mark. Could be a hair, however.
Yes, it could be - but ceramic numbers are perfect, the fakes tend to have dropout and not the "3D" effect.
Not sure if 'black' ceramic would scratch to 'white'?

any one seen a scratched black ceramic bezel?

see here - seems to scratch to black!
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=542185
Thanks
__________________
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. Winston Churchill
"We judge ourselves by what we feel capable of doing, while others judge us by what we have already done."
GLADIATOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 07:55 AM   #22
Knappo 1307
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Knappo 1307's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Jason
Location: USA
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 8,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by GLADIATOR View Post
Yes, it could be - but ceramic numbers are perfect, the fakes tend to have dropout and not the "3D" effect.
Not sure if 'black' ceramic would scratch to 'white'?

any one seen a scratched black ceramic bezel?

see here - seems to scratch to black!
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=542185
Thanks
If it is a scratch, it could be the lighting making it look white. I agree with you, the bezel looks good as far as it being real.
Knappo 1307 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 08:09 AM   #23
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
The scroll printing on that clasp blade looks sub-par at best.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 08:11 AM   #24
bondtoys
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: World
Watch: 16750
Posts: 2,733
I see deep damages between 5 minutes and 15.
I don’t think that these are fingerprints
bondtoys is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 08:12 AM   #25
Brew
"TRF" Member
 
Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Real Name: Larry
Location: Finger Lakes
Posts: 6,007
Why do folks guess? OP asked for help, not beliefs and guesses.

Crowd sourcing authenticity seems like a poor way to make this determination.
Brew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 08:19 AM   #26
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brew View Post
Why do folks guess? OP asked for help, not beliefs and guesses.

Crowd sourcing authenticity seems like a poor way to make this determination.
Let's put things into perspective. OP buys perhaps the most faked Rolex in the world. Spends several thousands of $$ Then comes here for authentication?
Would you do the same? I sure as hell wouldn't. I asked him for images of the warranty card. We will see if he comes back or is just trolling for a fake watch.
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 January 2020, 02:19 AM   #27
NitroRacer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chicago
Watch: M SS WG DJ OYSTER
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigblu10 View Post
Let's put things into perspective. OP buys perhaps the most faked Rolex in the world. Spends several thousands of $$ Then comes here for authentication?
Would you do the same? I sure as hell wouldn't. I asked him for images of the warranty card. We will see if he comes back or is just trolling for a fake watch.
Looks like he came back.
NitroRacer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 08:32 AM   #28
crowncollection
"TRF" Member
 
crowncollection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,216
Looks ok from here


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
watches many
crowncollection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 10:24 AM   #29
PRSWILL
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 267
One post... Ghost. If OP were concerned, he's be back by now- it's an $ 8,000 + watch.
PRSWILL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 January 2020, 10:34 AM   #30
Bigblu10
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Real Name: Jaime
Location: Here
Posts: 5,606
Quote:
Originally Posted by PRSWILL View Post
so here's the tell OP, you said "first invoice 2013"- maybe i'm not understanding- but this isn't a 2013 watch from what I can see- i'd put it at 2016+.

I always love these threads where the OP has posted 1 time about an $ 8,000+ watch and disappears - if I were seriously concerned about this, I'd be responding by now- all leads to probable fake - who knows...
The first character in the rehaut serial is a "G". Looks like 7 characters there, so if the watch is indeed genuine it would be a 2010 watch. And I emphasize the word "IF".
Bigblu10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.