ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 February 2020, 04:00 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Home
Posts: 207
|
Rolex 16808 correct bracelet
Hi all,
Is the 9958 the correct bracelet for 16808? Or it should be the 92908? Or both are ok? Thanks |
16 February 2020, 01:18 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Home
Posts: 207
|
Anyone?
|
16 February 2020, 02:01 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,296
|
Serial?
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
16 February 2020, 02:35 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Home
Posts: 207
|
From 1981
|
16 February 2020, 08:30 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Home
Posts: 207
|
anyone?
|
17 February 2020, 01:42 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Kent, England
Watch: Hublot BB Unico
Posts: 1,089
|
My 1984 model has a 92908 bracelet
|
19 February 2020, 12:39 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Home
Posts: 207
|
Do early 16808 from 1979 to 1984 have 9958 bracelet?
|
20 February 2020, 12:56 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Home
Posts: 207
|
anyone?
|
20 February 2020, 01:07 AM | #9 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Matt
Location: Wine Country, Ca
Posts: 5,998
|
Its a combination that isnt widely known compared to stainless steel models so you may not get a lot of feedback. I do know at some point in time the 9958 was used but I cant tell you exactly when since im not as schooled on the sold gold models as I am the stainless.
__________________
TRF Member 11738 |
20 February 2020, 02:37 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Home
Posts: 207
|
I see. Thank you. So it should be acceptable and original right?
|
20 February 2020, 03:13 PM | #11 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,296
|
Nobody said that, but if that's the answer you want ... ok.
Sometimes you either have to do your own research, or just live with uncertainty. People won't always spoon-feed you in this life.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
20 February 2020, 04:55 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Home
Posts: 207
|
On a 9958 bracelet it has a clasp code dating 1981. As a bracelet for Submariner I think it is for 16808 as it was the only ref of gold Sub at that time.
Anyone? |
20 February 2020, 04:58 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Home
Posts: 207
|
I am doing my research. And the forum is part of it, isn't it? I am asking here because I cannot find much info on Google. There are two sold by Hqmilton and Lunaoyster that came with 9958.
|
20 February 2020, 11:57 PM | #14 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,024
|
Rolex 16808 correct bracelet
Quote:
I am guessing you are looking at a 9958 bracelet currently for sale somewhere? Yes it was fitted to 16808’s for a few years. The 16808 was launched together with the 16800 in 1979 and 4-digit bracelets were carried over. Later, the newer bracelet was introduced and could be found but don’t forget the 9958 could be on a YG 16758 GMT too - so finding one with later date codes is possible. Whether any 16808 was fitted with a 9958 - even with a 1981 date - is not a certainty. But it is very likely. The exact date the newer bracelet shipped is unknown by me, but likely near 1983-84. HQ Milton sold such a combo on a purported 1982 16808 a while ago - is this one you saw? https://www.hqmilton.com/timepieces/...pple-dial-8767 Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
21 February 2020, 12:07 AM | #15 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 42,024
|
Rolex 16808 correct bracelet
Dupe
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
21 February 2020, 02:28 PM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Home
Posts: 207
|
Yes. That is the one I saw. The 9958 could be found on a 16758 also? But it has a diver extension so I thought it was exclusively for 16808. Anyway, it seems like a 16808 with 9958 is a rather rare combo.
|
22 February 2020, 03:00 AM | #17 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,296
|
nm
|
22 February 2020, 03:02 AM | #18 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,296
|
Bueller?
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.