The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 15 February 2021, 05:57 AM   #1
Flexjet
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Brussels
Posts: 47
5513 inserts

Hi,

I have been looking around for sometime, but possibly need ur advice on my 5513´s inserts/dials,

What do u think of them?
Looks like my 5513 meters first insert is from a later version (70’s)?

5513 meters first -1968 1.76 serial
5513 glossy - 1988 R364 serial


Thank you for your help and sharing ur expertise, always a pleasure to read u all!

Your time looking at my watches is much appreciated,

Greetings from Belgium
Attached Images
   
Flexjet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2021, 05:22 AM   #2
Magnum44
"TRF" Member
 
Magnum44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Real Name: Geir
Location: Norway
Watch: Rolex 1675
Posts: 38
Nice watches👍🏻😊
Here is my opinion! Your 88 has a service insert and needs a correct mk4, and your 67 has a 70s mk3 fat font insert. The correct insert for a 67 5513 meters first is a long 5 insert.
I’ve included a picture of a comparison that is available online and a picture of an mk4 I have.
Attached Images
   
Magnum44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2021, 05:55 AM   #3
stmoore
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
Quote:
Originally Posted by Magnum44 View Post
Nice watches������
Here is my opinion! Your 88 has a service insert and needs a correct mk4, and your 67 has a 70s mk3 fat font insert. The correct insert for a 67 5513 meters first is a long 5 insert.
I’ve included a picture of a comparison that is available online and a picture of an mk4 I have.
Good picture.
It’s missing the earliest mk3 (3.1), the skinny 4, the mk2 (non long 5), etc.

Interestingly, his is a 3.1.
stmoore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 February 2021, 09:13 PM   #4
swaini3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Mo
Location: Dubai
Watch: 1675 GMT, DRSD
Posts: 1,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by stmoore View Post
Good picture.
It’s missing the earliest mk3 (3.1), the skinny 4, the mk2 (non long 5), etc.

Interestingly, his is a 3.1.
Could you share a pic of the mk2 (non long 5). Not sure which one you mean?
Thanks.
swaini3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2021, 12:56 AM   #5
springer
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
springer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,319
The 1988 insert is original and not a service insert.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990.

INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP
Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics.
springer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 February 2021, 01:14 AM   #6
Flexjet
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: Brussels
Posts: 47
Thks a lot for sharing your opinions.
�� how can we get just passionated about such small differences but so nice to read about in the end,
Greetings
Flexjet is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.