The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 8 November 2021, 05:59 AM   #1
Rschiffman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3
Need help to ID

Hi all, just got this watch from family. It was in a safe deposit box for 30 years. Can anyone help id it? The back has an etched rolex logo. Thanks!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 20211030_200249_remastered.jpg (121.6 KB, 117 views)
Rschiffman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 November 2021, 06:03 AM   #2
Dan S
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,271
Kindergarten art project?
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG
Dan S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 November 2021, 06:25 AM   #3
BarkMaster
"TRF" Member
 
BarkMaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Watch: 18078 YG DD
Posts: 7,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan S View Post
Kindergarten art project?


To the OP: Google "Rolex Cellini 6621" (or 6622 or 6623) and compare it to what you have.
__________________
BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK BARK
BarkMaster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 November 2021, 06:45 AM   #4
CTech
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 466
It's difficult to understand what some members are saying with their cryptic comments about watches such as these, and I wonder if the answers are of any use to the OP. The main purpose of the responses seems to be to amuse other forum members or to show some sort of superiority, neither of which are particularly useful.

There have been comments on two other threads about this type of response, and although I agree that there might be some reasonable arguments about keeping quiet about how some features of replica watches differ from originals, those arguments only really apply where replicas of very expensive watches are being passed off as genuine, such as a 6542, a Milsub or a 5510.

For the watch the OP has posted, a clear and unambiguous response doesn't seem to have any downsides, so I'm baffled why nobody has yet made one.

To the OP: this is a poor imitation/copy/fake watch, so don't waste any time trying to compare it to genuine Cellini models.
CTech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 November 2021, 06:56 AM   #5
Rschiffman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3
Thank you!
Rschiffman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8 November 2021, 07:23 AM   #6
arcadelt
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Monaro, NSW
Posts: 846
Quote:
Originally Posted by CTech View Post
It's difficult to understand what some members are saying with their cryptic comments about watches such as these, and I wonder if the answers are of any use to the OP. The main purpose of the responses seems to be to amuse other forum members or to show some sort of superiority, neither of which are particularly useful.
Bravo
arcadelt is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.