The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 12 March 2022, 06:53 AM   #1
Michael1968
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Real Name: Michael
Location: Europe
Watch: UN,RolexTudor&more
Posts: 2,742
Can Cyclops lens leaks

Hi,
I’m not sure buy I have a feeling that my explorer II can leaks. You can see it on photos. Should I take it for a service? I didn’t swim with it just setting in jacuzzi and realized that they are air bubbles around cyclops lens.



Wysłane z iPad za pomocą Tapatalk
Michael1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 06:54 AM   #2
Michael1968
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Real Name: Michael
Location: Europe
Watch: UN,RolexTudor&more
Posts: 2,742



Wysłane z iPad za pomocą Tapatalk
Michael1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 06:54 AM   #3
Michael1968
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Real Name: Michael
Location: Europe
Watch: UN,RolexTudor&more
Posts: 2,742



Wysłane z iPad za pomocą Tapatalk
Michael1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 06:55 AM   #4
illiguy
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
illiguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,662
Not to create agita, but something looks off with your date wheel to me underneath the cyclops. Red flag.
illiguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 06:56 AM   #5
rushca01
"TRF" Member
 
rushca01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Indiana
Watch: GMT BLRO
Posts: 1,754
Your cyclops is glued on, you’re fine.
rushca01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 06:59 AM   #6
Potawatomi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Arizona
Posts: 910
Quote:
Originally Posted by illiguy View Post
Not to create agita, but something looks off with your date wheel to me underneath the cyclops. Red flag.
Fishy
Potawatomi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 07:00 AM   #7
EEpro
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
EEpro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,243
It won't leak. Your magnification ratio is wrong though.
__________________
Ω
2FA Active
EEpro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 07:03 AM   #8
mfserge
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: USA
Watch: YM40 Rhodium
Posts: 901
Is that an authenticated Rolex ?
mfserge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 07:06 AM   #9
train-time
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Plankton
Location: US
Watch: less
Posts: 4,161
It is glued on. Perhaps the heat has compromised the glue although as others have pointed out, the magnification seems off for a legit Rolex.
train-time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 07:08 AM   #10
Michael1968
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Real Name: Michael
Location: Europe
Watch: UN,RolexTudor&more
Posts: 2,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by EEpro View Post
It won't leak. Your magnification ratio is wrong though.

Maybe because of the water reflection out of water date looks fine for me. What you think?


Wysłane z iPad za pomocą Tapatalk
Michael1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 07:15 AM   #11
Roddypeepa
"TRF" Member
 
Roddypeepa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: Southern England
Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast
Posts: 1,688
It’s not magnifying 2.5 times imo. Are you sure it’s gen? Blue spots are normal as light refracts and interacts with glue/sapphire/cyclops but date looks too small


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Roddypeepa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 07:19 AM   #12
AF_Rob
"TRF" Member
 
AF_Rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Virginia
Watch: Sub/Polar/OP/BB
Posts: 4,671
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael1968 View Post
Maybe because of the water reflection out of water date looks fine for me. What you think?


Wysłane z iPad za pomocą Tapatalk

Pretty interesting, OP. I never realized that about the cyclops underwater. As others have said, the cyclops is glued on. You’re fine.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
AF_Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 07:20 AM   #13
JMGoodnight369
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Georgia USA
Posts: 373
Mmmmmm that don’t look right one bit
JMGoodnight369 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 07:24 AM   #14
stylinleems
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
stylinleems's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: N/A
Watch: 116500
Posts: 3,216
Looks fine in your picture (post #10). It could be lint around the cyclops, I get that as well with mine, just use a microfiber cloth/eyeglasses cloth and you'll be good
__________________
Rolex: 126334 (BL) | 116610LN | 116500LN (WT) | 116500LN (BK) | 126710BLRO | 116610LV | 116710BLNR
stylinleems is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 07:41 AM   #15
dpt.calvin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: TRF
Posts: 2,270
Aftermarket crystal?
__________________
16570 | 16710 | 116710 | 116500
76214 | 79090 | 79030 | 79830
dpt.calvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 07:47 AM   #16
Michael1968
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Real Name: Michael
Location: Europe
Watch: UN,RolexTudor&more
Posts: 2,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpt.calvin View Post
Aftermarket crystal?
I don't know. I bought from grey market dealer year ago. Watch looks fine box and papers are good too.
Michael1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 07:54 AM   #17
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,825
It’s prob from that time a few years ago when rolex was using low mag cyclopses and quietly removed the 2.5 claim from its website.
Attached Images
 
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 08:37 AM   #18
Subguy48
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 88
As others have said the Cyclops is glued on. If anything the area of the Cylcops is the most robust to leaks because it's two layers of sapphire stacked on top of each other. The bubbles are probably just air bubbles in the water catching the edges of the cyclops, similar to what you see going on around the bezel and crown in the pic aswell.

Regarding the comments on the magnification being wrong this is normal as the refraction index of glass is almost equal to water which is why there doesn't appear to be any magnification going on submerged.
Subguy48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 08:41 AM   #19
Michael1968
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2021
Real Name: Michael
Location: Europe
Watch: UN,RolexTudor&more
Posts: 2,742
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast View Post
It’s prob from that time a few years ago when rolex was using low mag cyclopses and quietly removed the 2.5 claim from its website.
That's probably true because on card is 2015 year.
Thank you

Michael1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 08:41 AM   #20
Old Expat Beast
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Old Expat Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,825
__________________
_______________________
Old Expat Beast is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 09:14 AM   #21
Jocke
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Jocke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Jocke
Location: Sweden
Watch: A dozen of Rolex's
Posts: 22,541
The cyclop not leaks, it is crying.
__________________
This message is written in perfect swenglish.

What is best a custom Rolex or a Rolex that is stuck in custom?

Buy a professional camera and you´re a professional
photographer, buy a flute and you own a flute.
Jocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 09:22 AM   #22
karleone
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dayona
Posts: 2,269
On the original pictures the magnification looks too small BUT THAT’S NORMAL AS PHOTO IS TAKEN UNDER WATER. Nothing wrong with your watch OP.
karleone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 12:30 PM   #23
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,693
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael1968 View Post
Hi,
I’m not sure buy I have a feeling that my explorer II can leaks. You can see it on photos. Should I take it for a service? I didn’t swim with it just setting in jacuzzi and realized that they are air bubbles around cyclops lens.



Wysłane z iPad za pomocą Tapatalk
I don't act the role of a scientist on TV but I am one in real life. It's very common for air bubbles to cling to crevices and roughness due to surface tension. That it all you are seeing. Air bubbles at the edge of the magnifying glass where it interfaces with the crystal. It's simply a piece of glass attached to the crystal by glue and nothing more. The glue has been hardened and cured. There is nothing there to leak.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 12:54 PM   #24
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
Those are not air bubbles ‘under’, they’re slow release and absorption from the dust and dirt which gets caught around the cyclops. They’re not smooth like the glass and this creates an imbalance of smoothness so the result is air resting in the area on the dust and dirt. Plus the temperature transfer from a sapphire onto the glued synthetic magnifier results in the uneven adjustment. Happens in aquariums all the time.

Clean your cyclops with an lens wipe with alcohol, let try then resubmerge and you’ll see no bubbles.
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 March 2022, 03:47 PM   #25
dlrolex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: N/A
Posts: 248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chewbacca View Post
Those are not air bubbles ‘under’, they’re slow release and absorption from the dust and dirt which gets caught around the cyclops. They’re not smooth like the glass and this creates an imbalance of smoothness so the result is air resting in the area on the dust and dirt. Plus the temperature transfer from a sapphire onto the glued synthetic magnifier results in the uneven adjustment. Happens in aquariums all the time.

Clean your cyclops with an lens wipe with alcohol, let try then resubmerge and you’ll see no bubbles.
I’m something of a scientist myself
dlrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.