The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 18 June 2022, 06:03 AM   #1
Greglaw
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 667
I tried on 41mm submariner date

Ok the hit this one out of the park. I’ve had the older models, vintage, 43mm sea dweller, deep sea, and 116610 and 114060 subs…but 41mm is perfection on me. Lugs, size, bracelet, just perfect.

Now I need to find one and so the hunt begins.
Greglaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 06:08 AM   #2
htrap2294
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Parth
Location: Los Angeles & SD
Watch: 16613LB
Posts: 577
There is something about the proportions of the 41mm Submariner. I think they did everything on it right. My only complaint is the slightly larger clasp, but even that is not a deal breaker.
__________________
Currently own: 16613LB, 214270, 126610LV
htrap2294 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 06:21 AM   #3
pwcres
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Eastern US
Watch: 16610
Posts: 62
I agree. At first the 41 seemed much larger than my 5 digit. After a few days I love the size of both. Weird how quickly we adapt and don’t even notice the differences.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
pwcres is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 06:33 AM   #4
jb335
2024 Pledge Member
 
jb335's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,466
I totally agree, OP.

My first Rolex was the 116610 and I sold it shortly after getting a 126610.

I generally do not like watches over 40mm, but I much prefer the 41mm Sub over the 40mm super case version.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jb335 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 06:33 AM   #5
domi1
"TRF" Member
 
domi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Real Name: Domi
Location: Croatia
Watch: 124060, BLRO...
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greglaw View Post
Ok the hit this one out of the park. I’ve had the older models, vintage, 43mm sea dweller, deep sea, and 116610 and 114060 subs…but 41mm is perfection on me. Lugs, size, bracelet, just perfect.

Now I need to find one and so the hunt begins.
absolutley agree, i have all: DSSD (too big), sd 43 (too big), 114060 (too big lugs), and new 12 series is maybe one of the best references in Rolex diver history!
domi1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 06:34 AM   #6
Politiceaux
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: LA
Posts: 256
The 12 series sub is perfect. Absolutely perfect.
Politiceaux is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 08:22 AM   #7
Greglaw
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by domi1 View Post
absolutley agree, i have all: DSSD (too big), sd 43 (too big), 114060 (too big lugs), and new 12 series is maybe one of the best references in Rolex diver history!
I totally agree with this!
Greglaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 08:24 AM   #8
Giovannibravo
2024 Pledge Member
 
Giovannibravo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Canada
Watch: Sub| DJ41| 79540
Posts: 1,420
Well the 11 series is 40.2 mm compared to the 40.5 mm to the 12 series. But the 11 series has a larger footprint when compared to the 12 series. Wear much better.
Giovannibravo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 08:28 AM   #9
sski
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: FL
Watch: ♛ & ✠
Posts: 943
Icon5

Quote:
Originally Posted by domi1 View Post
absolutley agree, i have all: DSSD (too big), sd 43 (too big), 114060 (too big lugs), and new 12 series is maybe one of the best references in Rolex diver history!
bold claim....is the latest ref. better than the 4 digit Sub references? just curious. Some say 4 digit Rolex references were the pinnacle.
sski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 08:37 AM   #10
Nepats81
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Boston/Miami
Posts: 313
Is the black or green sub better?
Nepats81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 09:16 AM   #11
Clon3
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Canada
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by htrap2294 View Post
There is something about the proportions of the 41mm Submariner. I think they did everything on it right. My only complaint is the slightly larger clasp, but even that is not a deal breaker.
100% agree. No complaints except for the thickness of the clasp. I wear my watches on my right and when I work on a computer using the mouse (right hand), it's super uncomfortable.
Clon3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 09:25 AM   #12
inadeje
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
inadeje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Miami
Watch: me lose count.
Posts: 5,907
In agreement OP. The proportions of the 41 are perfect. Slimmed down lugs and overall a more cohesive ensemble. Clasp is a little overkill, but it’s not a deal breaker.
__________________
♛ 218206 Roman ♛ 116689 ♛ 126710BLRO ♛ 16520 white ♛ 16523 white ♛ 16610 ♛ 5513 Birth Year - ✠ Patek Philippe 5980/1R-001 - AP 26331ST Panda - Panerai Bronzo 671 & 111, Ω Speedmaster 1957 Broad Arrow, Cartier Santos XL - Montblanc TimeWalker Chrono 41
inadeje is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 09:36 AM   #13
Golfbone
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 700
Agree.... the new SubDate is my favorite Rolex to wear day in and day out. Perfect. They nailed it.
Golfbone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 11:45 AM   #14
Greglaw
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 667
Quote:
Originally Posted by sski View Post
bold claim....is the latest ref. better than the 4 digit Sub references? just curious. Some say 4 digit Rolex references were the pinnacle.
Depends on the size you like…I have a bigger wrist and love vintage but want to create my own history and not worry about getting water in my vintage sub. Personal preference and was expressing what I like. Love the clasp. Good size for me.
Greglaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 01:28 PM   #15
Crazy Lugs
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: USA
Posts: 855
Quote:
Originally Posted by Politiceaux View Post
The 12 series sub is perfect. Absolutely perfect.
Agreed…aside from the wide bracelet with reduced taper and massive clasp!
Crazy Lugs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 08:33 PM   #16
s7horton
"TRF" Member
 
s7horton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Real Name: Seth
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Watch: 16613LB, 126610…..
Posts: 995
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Lugs View Post
Agreed…aside from the wide bracelet with reduced taper and massive clasp!

So… not perfect then?
s7horton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 09:43 PM   #17
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,493
They perfectly streamlined the fit on the new 41. Enjoy the hunt!
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 09:46 PM   #18
Divingdeep87
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 860
Quote:
Originally Posted by domi1 View Post
absolutley agree, i have all: DSSD (too big), sd 43 (too big), 114060 (too big lugs), and new 12 series is maybe one of the best references in Rolex diver history!
Ha same!
Divingdeep87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 10:01 PM   #19
1William
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,787
I have a new 124060 and like it very much. I can not tell much difference between it and the last generation but both are great.
1William is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 10:04 PM   #20
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,129
They did indeed nail it IMO

Hope you land one soon
brandrea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 June 2022, 10:18 PM   #21
John1083
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 68
12 series are incredible, 124060 is my choice but the date version is just as perfect.

Contrary to many, I love the updated clasp. Compared to my older sub and explorer with the light, janky rattle clasp, the newer version is so much more refined and robust. I am not gentle on watches so I prefer the confidence of the new clasp.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
John1083 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2022, 12:11 AM   #22
Agamemnon
"TRF" Member
 
Agamemnon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2022
Real Name: Giuliano
Location: Italy
Watch: Rolex - Panerai
Posts: 1,979
Good hunting! For me it was a pleasure. It's the watch I wear the most.
Agamemnon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2022, 01:05 AM   #23
alphadweller
"TRF" Member
 
alphadweller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vic
Location: Spain
Watch: SD43
Posts: 6,198
It's alright but I prefer a larger diver. I bought the TT blue Sub41 because there's no TT blue SD43. I enjoy the Sub, but to me the proportions of the SD43 are unrivaled.
alphadweller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2022, 01:36 AM   #24
domi1
"TRF" Member
 
domi1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Real Name: Domi
Location: Croatia
Watch: 124060, BLRO...
Posts: 323
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greglaw View Post
Depends on the size you like…I have a bigger wrist and love vintage but want to create my own history and not worry about getting water in my vintage sub. Personal preference and was expressing what I like. Love the clasp. Good size for me.
agree! mee too have big hands and 4 an 5 digit is too small for me!
domi1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2022, 01:40 AM   #25
Oxfordian
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Martin
Location: England
Watch: Sea Dweller
Posts: 3,117
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greglaw View Post
Ok the hit this one out of the park. I’ve had the older models, vintage, 43mm sea dweller, deep sea, and 116610 and 114060 subs…but 41mm is perfection on me. Lugs, size, bracelet, just perfect.

Now I need to find one and so the hunt begins.
I have no interest in the older Subs, the new range is super comfortable, well my 124060 is super comfortable.

Good luck on your hunt

__________________
Martin

Small Rolex, Omega, Seiko and Oris Collection
Oxfordian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2022, 01:42 AM   #26
minute_man
2024 Pledge Member
 
minute_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Basil
Location: Athens, GR
Watch: BoctokKomandirskie
Posts: 2,881
They've perfected the Submariner with the 41

__________________
2FA Enabled
minute_man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2022, 01:53 AM   #27
JasoninDenver
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Denver
Posts: 4,284
So, does the new clasp really wear differently with the added width???

I tried an exhibition piece on at an AD and, surprisingly against my expectations, I really did not notice a difference on the wrist. But, of course, is was not sized.
__________________
Jason

116610 LN
DateJust
Pelagos FXD
JasoninDenver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2022, 01:59 AM   #28
Philadelphialawyer1
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 310
I have an 11 series SS 2016. Looking to add a black TT but like the super case so will look to get a later model 11 series TT. The bigger wrist presence is something I like. This seems to be a minority position.
Philadelphialawyer1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2022, 02:01 AM   #29
JayHantz
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
JayHantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Texas
Watch: @Escapementt
Posts: 9,844
Best of luck on the hunt! I think the 41mm is perfect and the LV just fit perfectly.
JayHantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 June 2022, 02:04 AM   #30
minute_man
2024 Pledge Member
 
minute_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Real Name: Basil
Location: Athens, GR
Watch: BoctokKomandirskie
Posts: 2,881
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasoninDenver View Post
So, does the new clasp really wear differently with the added width???

I tried an exhibition piece on at an AD and, surprisingly against my expectations, I really did not notice a difference on the wrist. But, of course, is was not sized.
Only to the eye, perhaps
__________________
2FA Enabled
minute_man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.