Jubilee bracelet on the BAY

[barber]

Hey everyone, I'm thinking about buying this and was wondering if it looked genuine to you all. Thanks


http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...=tab%3DBidding

[idk01]

All the ref numbers look good

Just needs Stan's stamp of approval

[springer]

Originally Posted by idk01

All the ref numbers look good

Just needs Stan's stamp of approval

Looks good to me also.

[blaine mattison]

i don't like it. RANDOMLY stamped, steelinox is on the scroll. registered is off set

the "J">>> means "just" in case some needs more stamps

[blaine mattison]

try it again, the "j">>>means, just in case i need more stamps

slow down, i here it all the time

[idk01]

Originally Posted by blaine mattison

try it again, the "j">>>means, just in case i need more stamps

slow down, i here it all the time

I'd say have another coffee Blaine but that might not help hhehehehehe

I'm having another one anyway

[tudorman8276]

[blaine mattison]

tudorman is knowledge is great, BUT there is nothing early about this.

to the band

to the tudorman

random stamps don't fly, pls. show me. i want to learn!!

[tudorman8276]

Originally Posted by blaine mattison

tudorman is knowledge is great, BUT there is nothing early about this.

to the band

to the tudorman

random stamps don't fly, pls. show me. i want to learn!!

...hi Blaine, just like everything else, Rolex's band innovations/line-up EVOLVED into what they are today.

...the coronet on this clasp, what can be seen, appears correct. The absence of "Pantented" is just like that found on the earliest 9315 bands, etc, where some of them were void of the stamping, etc.

...there are even several div ext variants, ALL genuine Rolex, while they were evolving.

[blaine mattison]

i can agree w/the evolving part BUT to disagree with respect, that if it is
a 78 yr band (c)>>>> my 77 year band is already evolved.

i just find it hard to believe, even in the late 70's the mother ship was still
OFFSETTING like that or still making gross mistakes as show

as you may remember, one of may examples you fixed (THANK-YOU AGAIN)

cheers!!!!!!!!
sharing of information is half the fun/happy hunting

[tudorman8276]

Originally Posted by blaine mattison

i can agree w/the evolving part BUT to disagree with respect, that if it is
a 78 yr band (c)>>>> my 77 year band is already evolved.

i just find it hard to believe, even in the late 70's the mother ship was still
OFFSETTING like that or still making gross mistakes as show

as you may remember, one of may examples you fixed (THANK-YOU AGAIN)

cheers!!!!!!!!
sharing of information is half the fun/happy hunting

...

[springer]

I missed some of the posts here, but noticed one from Blaine about the "registered" being offset.

As Stanley stated, it was common on the older bands. I currently wear an older 93150 band on my daily GMT beater, which is probably a first generation 93150 band. It has the "registered" offset like the band in this post. I've seen many of the older bands with this stamping, as Stanley mentioned.

[blaine mattison]

springer, just for my memory bank, could you share that letter yr date/dates?


cheers

[springer]

Originally Posted by blaine mattison

springer, just for my memory bank, could you share that letter yr date/dates?


cheers

Sure can Blaine. "VD" which by my reference material is 1979. It's either a late 9315 clasp or a very early 93150. The band is not marked with the band style number.

[blaine mattison]

i guess mother using different sources during that period.

my vb w/ 78360 ends is marked different no offset and no model #
on clasp? hmm