I found this Rolex in our basement

[horlogedrager1234]

Good day,

We found this Rolex in our basement and would like to know if it is a real or Fugazi watch.

I know that the watch can be as old as 20 years old.

The watch still works and has never been worn.

The reference is 69623.

Could someone please help me?

[horlogedrager1234]

I've added more photos

[Greglaw]

Just...no. When will this end. Oh, never.

[messikens]

I think you have the answer

[fskywalker]

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[1675-David]

Looks like a ladies Yatchmaster 34mm with a reservation for the crap images, seen on my phone while traveling on a train in a foreign country..

[sski]

fugazi. your watch is 'inspired' by Rolex ref. 16622 (yacht-master)

[wesdaniel]

That's the famous Rolex NachtMaster.

[Masteryacht]

This is what it should look like.

[2loaded]

Love the "basement" watches. Bottoms Up !

[Fredrik]

I need better pictures to say anything definite.

In any case, there was a ladies yacht-master with reference 69623 back in the day, but it was two-tone. There was also an all steel version. The watch in the pictures kind of looks like one, but it's hard to tell.

This is what they look like:

[GGGMT]

Better pics would clear this up


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[fozzyf18]

[QUOTE=GGGMT;12720167]Better pics would clear this up


Agree 100% Your initial posts do not look good as far as authenticity is concerned.

[Al1969]

Put in back in the basement.

[fsprow]

I have this watch from
Grandfather>Found in drawer or basement>A friend asked me to check>A friend received as a gift ……

[Rrpdc]

Originally Posted by Al1969

Put in back in the basement.

+1

[janice&fred]

Originally Posted by GGGMT

Better pics would clear this up


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The most pronounced clues when determining authenticity of late model watches via crappy pics is usually snapshots of the back of the watch. The head links usually give them away. In this particular case it's manifestly obvious.

[GGGMT]

Originally Posted by janice&fred

The most pronounced clues when determining authenticity of late model watches via crappy pics is usually snapshots of the back of the watch. The head links usually give them away. In this particular case it's manifestly obvious.

I think it’s a very close call. Just need a bit sharper pix to determine for sure. I’m leaning authentic. A tad more focus.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[afnios1]

back to the basement,cover it with cement and then relax.

[Old Expat Beast]

OP hasn't bothered checking in since the day he first posted, but yes, those endlinks are surely proof enough that the watch is junk.

[AlabamaLawyer1988]

That’s about as fake as they come.

DM


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Al1969]

Originally Posted by GGGMT

I think it’s a very close call. Just need a bit sharper pix to determine for sure. I’m leaning authentic. A tad more focus.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The crappy camera or the Folex?

[GGGMT]

Originally Posted by Al1969

The crappy camera or the Folex?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[The WatchMan]

Ok Newish Guy here. What's the issue with the "found in basement" posts. Are people bagging on the watch or the poster. It feels like and "first posts" with a basement/back of drawer find are suspect more than the watch. Or am I misreading this?