ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Atlanta · 23 February 2009, 04:43 AM

As some of you may know from previous posts, I have been jones'n for an Explorer for quite some time; however, the more I learn about them and look at them - I seem to be drawn to the 1016's rather than the newest model.

With this said, I have been looking at prices for LNIB and it seems more economical to get a Sub ND than an Explorer, and the added function of the bezel for lapsed time is a tremendous feature.

I am curious if anyone narrowed to these two models and what decisions you made. Both are icons and gentlemen's tools. I am not looking for advice - just a discussion.

arkwhaler · 23 February 2009, 04:51 AM

the explorer fit my wrist better. it's also more uncommon. i agree if they offered a 1016 style at about 3K that would be the optimal watch. i didn't think i needed a honkin' bezel all the time, as this is to be my only watch for all uses, including formal.

cody p · 23 February 2009, 05:01 AM

they both share the exact same movement - so it really boils down to aesthetics and perception.

Lion · 23 February 2009, 05:03 AM

Buy the watch that you like the most and don't be swayed by what others think/do. I bought a new Sub ND and thoroughly enjoy it. If you really want an Explorer 1016, then do the research find one and buy it. Remember you will be the one wearing it so get the one you enjoy!!!

kyle L · 23 February 2009, 05:53 AM

Both are great watches, but I went for the simpler one: The explorer.

jay_kay · 23 February 2009, 05:56 AM

I was in the exact same situation!!! So I bought 1 of each!!!! Susequently sold the non date as I have the sub date and sea-dweller. Love the explorer, massively under-rated watch!!

Subexplorer · 23 February 2009, 06:12 AM

I personally feel that they are different kind of watches, which fill different requirements.
If you wish a classic, low profile, all situations use watch, and don´t mind not having a date feature, go for the Explorer. This is a great underrated piece of horology.

If you like a more flashy, sporty look, or if you are involved in water sports or diving, then the SD is the one.

I had always loved the Submariner, and got two of them. Never paid attention to the SD.
But now the SD is discontinued, I felt it would be interesting to have one in my collection of Rolex diving watches, and I bought one myself last week. I had to recognize that it is a great watch, a little heavier and little mor height than the Sub, but a very nice watch indeed. I love its inscriptions of the case back. Small but very nice detail.

And the Explorer?? Well, I love that watch too!! I got one.

I guess it is a very personal decision to choose one between the two models, if you can´t follow the path of fellow member Jay Kay... or me.

My best suggestion would be to visit an AD, and try the two watches, have it on your wrist for some minutes each, repeat the change and see which one looks better in your wrist as per your own opinion, or which one you feel better, considering weight, size, use expected, etc.

Good luck with your decision, and post a picture when you buy it!
Kind regards, Abel

Subexplorer · 23 February 2009, 06:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kyle L

Both are great watches, but I went for the simpler one: The explorer.

Hi Kyle!!
Beautiful watch you got there. I´m sure you love and enjoy your Rolex!
Best cordial regards! Abel

AIKO · 23 February 2009, 06:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Atlanta

As some of you may know from previous posts, I have been jones'n for an Explorer for quite some time; however, the more I learn about them and look at them - I seem to be drawn to the 1016's rather than the newest model.

With this said, I have been looking at prices for LNIB and it seems more economical to get a Sub ND than an Explorer, and the added function of the bezel for lapsed time is a tremendous feature.

I am curious if anyone narrowed to these two models and what decisions you made. Both are icons and gentlemen's tools. I am not looking for advice - just a discussion.

I thought for sure I was going to buy the white EXP II but something about the bezel turned me off. The white dial and date are special. But in the end I opted for the Sub LV because I loved the green and the ability of the watch to morph when the black bezel is added.

In your decision, I would decide whether I liked the date or not.

AIKO · 23 February 2009, 06:19 AM

Sorry just noticed you were talking about I not II.

23 February 2009, 04:43 AM	#1
Atlanta "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Jack Location: Atlanta, GA Watch: 126619LB & 114270 Posts: 767	Anyone pick the Sub ND over the Explorer (I)? As some of you may know from previous posts, I have been jones'n for an Explorer for quite some time; however, the more I learn about them and look at them - I seem to be drawn to the 1016's rather than the newest model. With this said, I have been looking at prices for LNIB and it seems more economical to get a Sub ND than an Explorer, and the added function of the bezel for lapsed time is a tremendous feature. I am curious if anyone narrowed to these two models and what decisions you made. Both are icons and gentlemen's tools. I am not looking for advice - just a discussion. __________________ Member# 14554

23 February 2009, 05:03 AM	#4
Lion "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Leo Location: Midwest Watch: GMT-II 16710 PEPSI Posts: 21,461	Buy the watch that you like the most and don't be swayed by what others think/do. I bought a new Sub ND and thoroughly enjoy it. If you really want an Explorer 1016, then do the research find one and buy it. Remember you will be the one wearing it so get the one you enjoy!!! __________________ SS GMT-II 16710 PEPSI(Z-serial#) THE ONLY DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND BOYS IS THE PRICE OF THE TOYS!!! MontBlanc Meisterstuck Doue Silver Barley MontBlanc Meisterstuck Solitaire Doue Signum Proud Card Carrying Member of the Curmudgeons.....Yikes!!!

23 February 2009, 06:12 AM	#7
Subexplorer 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Abel Location: Down South Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 2,234	I personally feel that they are different kind of watches, which fill different requirements. If you wish a classic, low profile, all situations use watch, and don´t mind not having a date feature, go for the Explorer. This is a great underrated piece of horology. If you like a more flashy, sporty look, or if you are involved in water sports or diving, then the SD is the one. I had always loved the Submariner, and got two of them. Never paid attention to the SD. But now the SD is discontinued, I felt it would be interesting to have one in my collection of Rolex diving watches, and I bought one myself last week. I had to recognize that it is a great watch, a little heavier and little mor height than the Sub, but a very nice watch indeed. I love its inscriptions of the case back. Small but very nice detail. And the Explorer?? Well, I love that watch too!! I got one. I guess it is a very personal decision to choose one between the two models, if you can´t follow the path of fellow member Jay Kay... or me. My best suggestion would be to visit an AD, and try the two watches, have it on your wrist for some minutes each, repeat the change and see which one looks better in your wrist as per your own opinion, or which one you feel better, considering weight, size, use expected, etc. Good luck with your decision, and post a picture when you buy it! Kind regards, Abel __________________ 50 Years of ROLEX Passion! Grail Rolex: 5508 c. 1959 "Bond" Sub.

23 February 2009, 04:51 AM	#2
arkwhaler Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: flyover america Watch: 114270 Posts: 236	the explorer fit my wrist better. it's also more uncommon. i agree if they offered a 1016 style at about 3K that would be the optimal watch. i didn't think i needed a honkin' bezel all the time, as this is to be my only watch for all uses, including formal.

23 February 2009, 05:01 AM	#3
cody p "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Canada Watch: Air-King 114200 Posts: 2,878	they both share the exact same movement - so it really boils down to aesthetics and perception.

23 February 2009, 05:53 AM	#5
kyle L "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: USA Watch: Rolex Explorer I Posts: 10,278	Both are great watches, but I went for the simpler one: The explorer.

23 February 2009, 05:56 AM	#6
jay_kay "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Barrowford Watch: Tudor Black Bay 54 Posts: 1,699	I was in the exact same situation!!! So I bought 1 of each!!!! Susequently sold the non date as I have the sub date and sea-dweller. Love the explorer, massively under-rated watch!!

23 February 2009, 06:19 AM	#10
AIKO "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: South Carolina Posts: 1,937	Sorry just noticed you were talking about I not II.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)