ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
22 July 2019, 05:06 AM | #61 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 582
|
Better pic of 15450
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
22 July 2019, 01:13 PM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 198
|
This is one piece you got to try in person before deciding if you like it or not...I did so at the boutique and immediately knew it wasnt for me. Those with smaller wrists would probably appreciate it more, otherwise go for the 15400/15500.
|
23 July 2019, 07:01 AM | #63 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 582
|
Had both 15400 is huge.
15450 just right. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
23 July 2019, 04:41 PM | #64 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2019
Location: London
Posts: 265
|
I hope not as it’s purely a female watch (like the female offshore version). Just look at its variants full of diamonds and all colors-proof that it’s for females.
|
23 July 2019, 05:01 PM | #65 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Singapore
Posts: 198
|
|
27 July 2019, 02:00 AM | #66 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 582
|
|
27 July 2019, 02:42 AM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 205
|
Tried one on an hour ago. Have 7.25 wrist. Way too small for me.
|
28 July 2019, 08:51 AM | #68 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 582
|
|
29 July 2019, 10:27 PM | #69 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: louisville
Posts: 37
|
IMO 39mm suit most of the people.
|
29 July 2019, 11:27 PM | #70 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,823
|
Fits my 6.7 inch wrist perfectly. I would try this in the metal first before deciding.
|
31 July 2019, 03:58 AM | #71 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 582
|
|
11 April 2020, 10:47 PM | #72 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 489
|
Quote:
|
|
12 April 2020, 03:21 AM | #73 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: california
Posts: 17
|
|
12 April 2020, 05:05 AM | #74 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Real Name: Ben
Location: London, UK
Posts: 616
|
15450 is a great piece however I'd be turning my attention to the 14790, similar size range but retains more of the classic 5402 proportions, stunning 7.5mm thin case and semi-vintage appeal depending on the variant.
|
12 April 2020, 04:00 PM | #75 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Joyce
Location: SF and NYC
Watch: GMT, AP, DD,
Posts: 641
|
Having had a 15450, I’m now utterly bewitched by the vintage 25594 reference. Similar size case but Jumbo like thinness and sexy complications like the Day-date and moonphase.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
IG @crownthewatch |
12 April 2020, 04:38 PM | #76 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Real Name: Ben
Location: London, UK
Posts: 616
|
Quote:
This is an incredible early example. Such a gorgeous piece! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
12 April 2020, 09:24 PM | #77 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/PP/ALS
Posts: 6,001
|
Quote:
All the dealers will be very happy to sell whatever you want. Some dealer might mention that 15450 was for women, because of the bracelet length. If you like it, they will be very happy to sell it to you, but if your wrist size is bigger than 6.6 inches, you will need to add additional links to fit your wrist. When they design the watches, they intend to design to fit the majority without adding additional links, more likely take some links out. Most women have a smaller wrist than 6.6 inches, that was why 15450 model comes with the shorter bracelet length than 15400 model. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.