ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 May 2020, 09:59 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: Nick
Location: YUL
Watch: 16570
Posts: 1,936
|
__________________
Nick _________________________________________ 14060M - 114200 - 114270 - 214270 - 16710BLRO - 16570 - 3570.50 - Cartier Tank Solo - Cartier Tank Française ‘Yearling’ - CWC Navy Diver |
18 May 2020, 03:58 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: San Francisco, Ca
Watch: Oyster Perpetual
Posts: 1,629
|
When the 39MM Explorer replaced the 36MM Explorer there were dozens of posts here at TRF complaining that the length of its hands were too short.
|
18 May 2020, 04:09 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Real Name: Guy
Location: London
Posts: 126
|
If they use the same white dial as the op39 I’m def buying one!
|
18 May 2020, 10:28 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Rolex Air-King
Posts: 4,468
|
Bring back the Explorer in 36mm ... one version in Black and one in White
__________________
Instagram: timeonhand1010 |
18 May 2020, 10:42 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
|
My thought exactly, take it right to the top!!
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT |
18 May 2020, 11:03 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,596
|
And rolex agreed and corrected their mistake.
__________________
|
18 May 2020, 11:39 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Berlin
Posts: 100
|
It'd be great if they reintroduced the 36mm version.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.