The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29 March 2009, 12:43 PM   #1
nylawbiz
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: New York
Watch: too many
Posts: 705
So an AD Makes an offer, . . .

Ok, ok, not shoot me.

Question, If the cost was the same, would you rather own three watches (the SS Daytona, DSSD and LV Milgauss) or . . . the WG Daytona Meteorite dial? Three or one? That's a thought that has entered my cranium.

(ducking).

Last edited by nylawbiz; 29 March 2009 at 01:00 PM.. Reason: Clarifying Question
nylawbiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 12:45 PM   #2
bodybump
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller
 
bodybump's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Oscar
Location: Florida
Watch: Me!!!
Posts: 23,233
Quote:
Originally Posted by nylawbiz View Post
Ok, ok, not shoot me. Question, would you rather own the SS Daytona, DSSD and LV Milgauss or . . . WG Daytona Meteorite dial? Thars a thought that has entered my cranium.

(ducking).
ill narrow down into 3... SS daytona..DSSD..or Milaguss GV.....to be honest i tried them all and i cant decide..hahahahaha
__________________
bodybump is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 12:46 PM   #3
diablojota
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Real Name: Frank
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Watch: SS Submariner Date
Posts: 4,042
I'd have to go for the DSSD b/c it is the only one with a friggin' date. ;-)
diablojota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 12:55 PM   #4
Whiskey
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 521
I'd go with the DSSD (which I did!).

The Daytona is small and the Milgauss GV is even smaller! Neither have a date-function.

With regards to the Milgauss GV, how the hell can you justify paying a $2000premium just because the crystal is green????????????
Whiskey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 12:57 PM   #5
nylawbiz
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: New York
Watch: too many
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whiskey View Post
I'd go with the DSSD (which I did!).

The Daytona is small and the Milgauss GV is even smaller! Neither have a date-function.

With regards to the Milgauss GV, how the hell can you justify paying a $2000premium just because the crystal is green????????????
The same way you justify spending this kind of money on a watch to begin with!
nylawbiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 01:18 PM   #6
RolexSoFla
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: GMT-5
Watch: SS Daytona, ND Sub
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by nylawbiz View Post
Ok, ok, not shoot me.

Question, If the cost was the same, would you rather own three watches (the SS Daytona, DSSD and LV Milgauss) or . . . the WG Daytona Meteorite dial? Three or one? That's a thought that has entered my cranium.

(ducking).
I badly want a WG Daytona Meteorite but wouldn't give up my SS Daytona to get it.
RolexSoFla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 01:22 PM   #7
txbikerdude
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: texas
Posts: 622
3.... 'Ménage à trois'
txbikerdude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 07:44 PM   #8
walds11
"TRF" Member
 
walds11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Real Name: Adam
Location: Philly ‘burbs
Posts: 5,660
I would rather own three watches, but bag the Milgauss GV for something else.
__________________
Adam
walds11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 08:36 PM   #9
TheVTCGuy
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Paul
Location: San Diego
Watch: 126619LB
Posts: 21,540
The Three...
TheVTCGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 09:05 PM   #10
082013
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: London
Posts: 689
Just did this, went from my WG Sub, to a Pepsi GMT, White SS Daytona, and some funds in the bank....I prefer more and to rotate often, than one that commits all my funds.
082013 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 10:22 PM   #11
alant
"TRF" Member
 
alant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Alan
Location: Netherlands
Watch: Submariner Date
Posts: 238
Three!
alant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 10:53 PM   #12
STEELINOX
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
STEELINOX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,021
dam&$#@ !

WHY did you go and start a new thread - my hologram sticker was "this" close - you nutty New York Lawyer, I outghta sue you !
STEELINOX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 11:10 PM   #13
watchdawg
"TRF" Member
 
watchdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Vic
Location: Colorado/UAE
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 494
I can see it now the start of another never ending saga. Is it possible the AD finally gave you a reply or are you starting from the beginning again?
watchdawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 11:14 PM   #14
Alan111
"TRF" Member
 
Alan111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,605
ALL 3 !!!! Its fun to rotate
Alan111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 11:15 PM   #15
nylawbiz
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: New York
Watch: too many
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchdawg View Post
I can see it now the start of another never ending saga. Is it possible the AD finally gave you a reply or are you starting from the beginning again?
See the other thread. It ain't over yet!
nylawbiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 11:28 PM   #16
watchdawg
"TRF" Member
 
watchdawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Vic
Location: Colorado/UAE
Watch: GMT 1675
Posts: 494
Ok, just read the original thread. Not knowing if you have already spoken with the AD about your new version of your purchase I would stay with the original course. If the AD has already worked the numbers on your multiple purchase he might not be so inclined to transfer it to the single purchase. Guy probably wants to move his inventory what better way than selling 3 at one shot. On the other hand if memory serves me I believe that someone once posted that an AD has more room to bargin with precious metal watches. Either way what it really comes down too is what smiles at you.

Last edited by watchdawg; 30 March 2009 at 12:01 AM.. Reason: typo
watchdawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 March 2009, 11:55 PM   #17
oldrolex
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Steve
Location: WI, USA
Watch: DD Wanted
Posts: 580
go for 3
oldrolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 12:24 AM   #18
BigHat
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
This is a really good question for watch nuts to discuss and one that I've pondered a lot myself. Most of the time I like variety and lean towards the "3" answer. No question though that you can only wear one at a time and there is something to be said about more precious models.

If I could expand the question a bit to answer it more precisely. I think you should devote your watch money to getting enough variety for different situations. For example, I'm among the few here that doesn't think one should wear a SS Sub or SDDS with a Tux etc. I also think there is a place for a chrono, a high end quartz model and a pure dress watch in a collection before you start spending really big bucks.

I have the quantity of watches that I want, and will devote future resources trading a model I have toward one that I like better and it will probably be a bit higher up the price spectrum than the old one. For example, trading my SS VC OS for this RG one is likely my next step. I stay with a chrono and the brand diversity, just get one that I like the look of a bit more. Yes, the leather strap will change when it's worn, but I have sport options so it won't be a big loss. That's my thought process anyway.

So if you think you'll own three or more watches, I'd buy "3." Wear the SS Daytona for awhile and trade it in toward the WG model if and when the mood supports and the resources allow.
Attached Images
   
BigHat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 12:40 AM   #19
AIKO
"TRF" Member
 
AIKO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,937
Not even close, I would take the three and the DSSD would get most of the wrist time.
AIKO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 12:41 AM   #20
mfer
"TRF" Member
 
mfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Mik
Location: USA
Posts: 13,724
I say three and replace the GV with something else...

JMO guys, the Mil does little for me.
__________________
member#3242
mfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 01:08 AM   #21
SLS
"TRF" Member
 
SLS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
I really think you need to make this decision for yourself.
~Scott
__________________
"The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of lower price is forgotten." -Benjamin Franklin

Member No. 922
SLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 01:15 AM   #22
gregdolley
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Greg Dolley
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rose Gold Daytona
Posts: 1,283
I guess I'm the odd one out, but I'd get the WG Daytona (actually I'd do YG or RG) instead of the three. I just think the all gold Rolexes look way more stunning than the SS models. Plus, I think you could get a better discount on an all gold model.
gregdolley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 01:39 AM   #23
Mr. K
"TRF" Member
 
Mr. K's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: Mark
Location: Seattle-ish
Posts: 6,078
I'd go for all 3! and the one with the green crystal would get the most wrist time.
Mr. K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 01:47 AM   #24
nylawbiz
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: New York
Watch: too many
Posts: 705
So far, pretty consistent with getting all three (sorry Greg). I will make the decision myself in the end, but I always appreciate input from knowledgeable friends. So if you have a chance, please continue to chime in with your thoughts.
nylawbiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 02:42 AM   #25
tubojunk
"TRF" Member
 
tubojunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 507
Since I currently don't own any of the above 4, I would have to pick the set of three watches over the WG daytona.
__________________
Audemars 15707ce
Lange 191.032
Patek 5990/1a
Rolex 126610LN
tubojunk is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 03:44 AM   #26
smallcandle
"TRF" Member
 
smallcandle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: Kansas
Watch: 16610, Omega PO
Posts: 1,898
I'd just like for you to make a decision so that we can stop going over this.
smallcandle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 04:18 AM   #27
nylawbiz
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: New York
Watch: too many
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by smallcandle View Post
I'd just like for you to make a decision so that we can stop going over this.
You don't have to do anything. Participation in this (or any) thread is purely voluntary.

It seems that many people on here are interested in what discounts are available out there, so that was the premise of the other thread. This thread compares what the same amount of money buys: three watches vs. one gold watch. I just asking those who want to answer, what would you buy?
nylawbiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 04:22 AM   #28
STEELINOX
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
STEELINOX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Sink-O!
Location: a praire in AZ
Watch: ROLEX-less atm...
Posts: 14,021
lets be realistic Brian,

Quote:
Originally Posted by nylawbiz View Post
You don't have to do anything. Participation in this (or any) thread is purely voluntary.

It seems thatmany people on here are interested in what discounts are available out there, so that was the premise of the other thread. This thread compares what the same amount of money buys: three watches vs. one gold watch.
You too, had no real premise to extend the arduous litany of comparison to which combination of discount/metellurgy ratio's exsisted, if any, by which to premise this particular thread and as so far been presented could and shoud've been left in the original thread - all so I could get my hologram in the time allotted which you have "kibosh'd" now, thanks very much, man if I find my bat !

EDIT: For very imp info; gold rolexs in ANY combination, lost their values from 14 to 20 percent in the first year as they pass from the sweaty palm of the AD to the cold hand of buyer ! (or is it the other way around??)
STEELINOX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 04:29 AM   #29
nylawbiz
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: New York
Watch: too many
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by STEELINOX View Post
You too, had no real premise to extend the arduous litany of comparison to which combination of discount/metellurgy ratio's exsisted, if any, by which to premise this particular thread and as so far been presented could and shoud've been left in the original thread - all so I could get my hologram in the time allotted which you have "kibosh'd" now, thanks very much, man if I find my bat !

EDIT: For very imp info; gold rolexs in ANY combination lost their values from 14 to 20 percent in the first year as they pass from the sweaty palm of the AD to the cold hand of buyer ! (or is it the other way around??)
Sorry about the other thread. If I only knew the harm it would od, I would not have started it.
nylawbiz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2009, 04:30 AM   #30
BigHat
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
Quote:
Originally Posted by nylawbiz View Post
You don't have to do anything. Participation in this (or any) thread is purely voluntary.

It seems that many people on here are interested in what discounts are available out there, so that was the premise of the other thread. This thread compares what the same amount of money buys: three watches vs. one gold watch. I just asking those who want to answer, what would you buy?
I understand your point, but you are an adult right? You do have to made other decisions on your own from time-to-time?
In essence your question can be rephrased to "Please tell me what I should like?" I gave you my two cents, but I think you can understand why some have little patience for what should be a personal choice you have to make in the end. What you plan to buy, what you own now, what excites you the most, how much dough are you going to spend on watches are all factors you know and we don't. About a million permutations of the above make the conditional answers endless and thus boring.
I think you will also learn that the "it's my thread, stay away if you don't like it" doesn't work too well around here.

Just something to help you understand the terse answers you'll get. Good luck !! Tell us, better yet, show us what you buy.

Edit: The more I think about it, I'd never buy three watches at the same time. Dilutes the enjoyment, plus it ties your hands if you decide you'd rather buy other brands or models.
BigHat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.