ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
1 February 2022, 01:56 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: East coast
Posts: 6,660
|
|
28 January 2022, 11:03 AM | #2 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
|
I love the six digits more weight and Glidelock clasp. But hey my 16710 five-digit is still getting its fair share of wrist time.
|
28 January 2022, 11:06 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Dan
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Watch: Sub LV
Posts: 678
|
I agree, I like the comfort and the better engineering of my 6-digit DJ over my 5-digit Coke. The thin metal of the clasp just seems so cheezy now. But I do still enjoy wearing it - and especially the remarks I get from AD's when they see the lug holes. Yeah I know, I'm so shallow...
Funny thing, the TT Sub you have was my grail watch since before I bought a real Rolex. I got a knock-off of that very model in China once, before I knew anything about Rolexes, and wore it for a year until the crown fell off... but it lit my appetite for the brand even though it took me 15 years or so to get a real one. -Dan
__________________
Watches: GMT-II Coke series K; DJ36 SS white-dial & Roulette date; 126610LV Starbucks Wife's watch: DJ31 RG/SS, diamond dial, diamond bezel -- "Wear the watch, don't let the watch wear you!" |
28 January 2022, 12:45 PM | #4 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Daytona + GMT BLNR
Posts: 4,852
|
Quote:
|
|
28 January 2022, 01:08 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: John
Location: Texas
Watch: 14060
Posts: 3,434
|
I prefer my 5 digit Sub and GMT to the six digit references, but I prefer my 6 digit Day-Date and Daytona to the 5 digits.
|
28 January 2022, 08:26 PM | #6 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,692
|
Jay, I totally understand. I traded mine in towards a watch I really wanted and haven't looked back. There are a few I'd still consider owning but for the most part I'm done with five digit references. Sorry to reply to this old post; didn't realize I'd already done so over a year ago.
|
29 January 2022, 01:13 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 1,079
|
I feel you. I only miss sell one of my 5 digits ( my fist Sub)
I definitely prefer the newer models in almost every way. |
31 January 2022, 08:21 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Gold Coast, Aus
Posts: 76
|
Six digits are better watches in every conceivable way. I could never go back.
|
1 February 2022, 02:10 AM | #9 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: Somewhere Cold
Posts: 907
|
Own both, wear both, love both.
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Rolex Sea-Dweller 16600 Rolex Explorer 224270 Rolex Explorer II 226570 Polar Omega Moonwatch Sapphire Sandwich Panerai PAM00111 2 Factor Authentication |
2 February 2022, 11:36 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: USA
Watch: Collector
Posts: 1,482
|
|
1 February 2022, 05:11 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dayona
Posts: 2,269
|
For Sub/SD/GMT I find the 5 digits case much more refined and perfect proportions compared to 6 digits. Bracelet is hollow links and clasp feels cheap but on the other side it’s very light and comfortable. I have a 16610 and a 16710 and they have perfect proportions and great fit on my wrist. I have a 116500 as well and I can feel the better quality and finish especially the buckle.
|
1 February 2022, 12:14 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Dallas tx
Watch: 16610,1675,16030
Posts: 1,136
|
The 6 digits are obviously better in many ways, but I have no use for them.
When I think about a Submariner, or a GMT, it’s not the ceramic bezeled, big block cased watches with the machined clasps I think of. I think about Jacques Cousteau and Dizzy Gilespie and Picasso, McQueen and Jeff Bridges and those old National Geographic ads when it was a magazine and not a TV network. That’s what I first liked about Rolex, and what I still like about them. I don’t get that feeling from the newer ones like I do from my 4 and 5 digits. Doesn’t mean they are better, just means I like them better. |
2 February 2022, 05:10 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Las Vegas NV
Watch: 14060M COSC
Posts: 1,336
|
I’m sticking with my 5 digit 14060M. I have owned Rolex since 1964. Lot of marketing hype about the bracelets designed to sell the latest, and most profitable models. IMO.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro |
2 February 2022, 08:01 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,652
|
Owned both, love both but 5 digits for me.
__________________
Rolex 116613LN Rolex 16610LN Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra 41mm Omega Geneve Tag Heuer Aquaracer WAY2112 Orient Ray 2 |
3 February 2022, 11:02 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dayona
Posts: 2,269
|
Imho the case looks way better on 5 digits Sub/SD/GMt compared to 6 digits. Bracelet size compared to lug width goes better and the thinner crown guards are definitely more refined. Small details like lugs being V brushed (vs straight) and chamfers / bevels are very attractive on the 5 digits. I understand people preferring 6 digits finish and quality (I daily wear a 116500) but I have to admit the proportions on the 5 digits are just perfect. Finally the 5 digits bracelet have a cheap clasp but it works very well with age and the whole bracelet being hollow link is much lighter and more comfy than 6 digits.
My M serial 16610 from 09 and my K serial 16710 from 01 |
4 February 2022, 02:09 AM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: US
Posts: 1,385
|
16800 on an SEL bracelet. Best of both worlds.
Sent from my SM-G996U using Tapatalk
__________________
NAWCC Member |
4 February 2022, 03:10 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Dayona
Posts: 2,269
|
Well done!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.