ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
11 November 2020, 05:32 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Finland
Posts: 343
|
A lot of it is due to pure man-hours and branding/marketing. Finishing is usually secondary.
Like in pretty much everything, after a certain threshold you begin to see diminshing returns. Small technological leaps have huge cost increases. You will see a significant difference between a $300 Seiko and a $2000 Oris, but there the curve starts to flatten a bit. For example, there is virtually no difference between a Tudor in-house movement and a Rolex one other than the "superlative chronometer" label as per Rolex standards - both do little to no finishing and generally the movements are ugly af. Personally, I think Grand Seiko's Spring Drive is the greatest movement ever created and holds the most bang for buck (alongside their 9F quartz movements).
__________________
👑 116400GV 🛡️ 25600TN 🇬 GWM5610 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.