The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11 November 2020, 05:32 PM   #1
goliat
"TRF" Member
 
goliat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Finland
Posts: 343
A lot of it is due to pure man-hours and branding/marketing. Finishing is usually secondary.

Like in pretty much everything, after a certain threshold you begin to see diminshing returns. Small technological leaps have huge cost increases. You will see a significant difference between a $300 Seiko and a $2000 Oris, but there the curve starts to flatten a bit. For example, there is virtually no difference between a Tudor in-house movement and a Rolex one other than the "superlative chronometer" label as per Rolex standards - both do little to no finishing and generally the movements are ugly af.

Personally, I think Grand Seiko's Spring Drive is the greatest movement ever created and holds the most bang for buck (alongside their 9F quartz movements).
__________________
👑 116400GV
🛡️ 25600TN
🇬 GWM5610
goliat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.