ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 May 2020, 08:36 AM | #61 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,248
|
i'll go for 11, the finished on the movement is amazing.
|
27 December 2020, 09:36 PM | #62 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,662
|
The 15202 is more attractive in aesthetics. The 5711 is more practical as a daily wearer. Ultimately, I’d go Jumbo. Can’t get over the “ears” on the 5711. Not hating, just my own preference.
|
28 December 2020, 06:10 AM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Vince
Location: England
Watch: Too many!
Posts: 5,744
|
Both are great, but haven’t bought either. Committed to buying them both some years ago when planning my collection. But ended up buying a 5990 and a 15300 instead.
If the choice was between a 15300 and a 5711, I’d go 15300 as I prefer the aesthetics. But the lack of a second hand on the 15202 bothers me, so I’d go 5711 if forced to choose between those two. And may yet actually add one. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune |
28 December 2020, 09:53 AM | #64 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Bay Area, CA
Watch: this
Posts: 1,286
|
I too was contemplating PP 5711 vs. AP 15202. Both are beautiful and knew I was going to get 15202 down the road. For this reason I went with complications Patek 5712 and AP15202.
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk |
28 December 2020, 10:00 AM | #65 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: UTC/GMT -5
Posts: 3,662
|
Well done. If I were to ever go Nautilus and was lucky enough to have the means to do so, I’d also go 5712. For some reason, it actually appeals to my eyes more than the 5711 and, oddly enough, mitigates the “ear” look.
|
28 December 2020, 10:55 AM | #66 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Dallas,NY,Colo.
Watch: Patek 5168, 5170P
Posts: 2,547
|
I have and love both. I just find I reach for the 15202 more often. I traded a 15500 for it.
|
28 December 2020, 12:55 PM | #67 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Sunshine State
Watch: All
Posts: 239
|
Also have both and 15202 is hands down better in looks and comfort. They are both hyped watches but I think 15202 is worth the money.
|
28 December 2020, 08:54 PM | #68 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Santa Fe
Posts: 1,899
|
Hopefully, by this time, you've made a decision.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.