ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 December 2020, 11:06 AM | #61 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2020
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 122
|
Quote:
|
|
29 December 2020, 11:18 PM | #62 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 434
|
It depends on his point of view and his wrist. For me the 15202 is precisely a small watch, and the 15500 adequate.
In addition, it has a movement that I qualify as superior in specifications (power reserve for example) and in-house. In addition, it fills the bottom of the box well and does not seem to swim like it was previously the case. I also adore the absence of "automatic", it is an advantageous correction in my eyes because I never understood why there is need to specify it. The argument that it is thicker makes me smile, it remains a proportionate and thin watch. They are all magnificent, and sometimes you have to make a choice, for me the 15500 is my perfect RO.
__________________
116500LN ¦ 116610LV ¦ 126505 ¦ 126515LN ¦ 126655 ¦ 126600 ¦ 126710BLNR ¦ 126715CHNR ¦ 226570 ¦ 226659 Grönefeld 1941 RCF ¦ H. Moser Heritage Dual Time ¦ JLC Q1308470 ¦ L&S 1815 Up/Down ¦ L&S Zeitwerk Date ¦ UN Freak X carbonium |
30 December 2020, 12:09 PM | #63 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London/Tokyo
Watch: FPJ CO BL
Posts: 1,709
|
For me im the opposite. I just couldnt get along with the 15202 due to the annoying date situation and lack of seconds hand....The 15500ST for me is the ideal daily driver.
__________________
F.P.Journe Chronometre Optimum Black Label, Patek 5811G-001, Patek 5968A-001, Patek 5167A-001 IG: tokyo_watch_guy |
30 December 2020, 01:01 PM | #64 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2018
Real Name: Frank
Location: Dallas,NY,Colo.
Watch: Patek 5168, 5170P
Posts: 2,547
|
Quote:
The watch thinness is addictive. Hard to wear a thick Rolex now. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.