Why does the Explorer II not have a trip lock crown?

[Jackie Daytona]

Originally Posted by Rocket_Man

Not quite, it is mostly marketing and feature set/complications

- Explorer II, MSRP US $8,350: Non-rotating 24 hr bezel, brushed Oyster bracelet, twin lock crown

- GMT Master II, MSRP US $9,700: Rotating and ceramic 24hr bezel, jubilee bracelet with polished center links, trip-lock crown,

People expect something for their additional money. If you compare the GMT to the Sub/Date at MSRP of 9,150 it slots between the Exp II and GMT, closer to the GMT but lacking the GMT complication and with the brushed oyster bracelet. But less money too. Maybe not a lot, but less.

Maybe when the redo the Explorer II they may move a new feature up to the watch like they did with the EZ link and the Explorer (I) a few years ago. But there is a hierarchy in their line up that tracks with MSRP. If they give the Exp II a ceramic bezel that may be its little upgrade for the new gen Exp II in addition to the new 32XX movement.

When compared to the GMT master specifically I see your point as it is the most similar to it yet lacking, but looking at the professional series SS models as a whole I disagree with saying it’s a bit of an entry level watch. There is undoubtedly a bit of a hierarchy with their models like you mentioned, but I honestly believe an entry level professional series would go more to the Air King, Explorer I, Submariner (no date). All great watches, don’t get me wrong, not trying to detract anything from them. But I believe out of all sports models in their standard form it sits more in the middle of it. Not that it really matters one way or the other really, just clarifying what I meant when I said I disagree I guess.


Also on topic. I don’t believe it would serve any benefit to have a trip lock crown. It’s not a diving watch, and the case couldn't take it anyways without a whole redesign. I like the idea of a go anywhere do anything sort of model, but I think 330ft is probably more than enough for any standard explorations. More than that a true diver would probably be better served for the expedition if viewing it as a true tool watch.