ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 April 2021, 12:55 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,429
|
Rolex Submariner 116659. Why no depth rating on dial?
I'm genuinely curious about this. Saw one posted on RPR/IG and asked. I wondered if somehow the gem setting affected the integrity of the case. Philip responded with something along the lines of, "This is a beautiful watch not intended for work." So I wrote back and mentioned that the the PM subs all had the depth rating on the dial so why not this one. And he deleted my comment.
Anyway, I would just like to know the real answer. I mean sure, no one is probably going to dive with a 150K watch but on the other hand it's not crazy to think someone might... There are plenty of people to whom 150K isn't that much and one of the things about even the most decked out Rolex is that they are tough; not fragile baubles. Watch I'm referring to. |
27 April 2021, 01:03 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: MD/NC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,591
|
Interesting question...none of the cosmetic augmentations would presumably impact the depth rating of the watch, although the jewels themselves might be dislodged from heavier water usage? If nothing else, the dial does look 'cleaner' with only 3 lines of text. I'm not normally a fan of blinged out watches but this is a very attractive watch. I'd love to see a video of the process of making this.
|
27 April 2021, 01:16 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Nick
Location: Las Vegas
Watch: 1601
Posts: 10,623
|
I would dive with that thing on. Always wanted to catch a barracuda by hand.
|
28 April 2021, 11:50 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,429
|
Giving this a bump in case anyone has any ideas.
|
28 April 2021, 01:11 PM | #5 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,460
|
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
28 April 2021, 01:28 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,429
|
Quote:
|
|
28 April 2021, 02:01 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
I have no idea but I love how it looks with only three lines of type.
|
28 April 2021, 03:30 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
I remember when this was released and one reviewer stated something to the extent that first off the bezel doesn't have any numbers or graduations for timing and further that because of the jewels fixed to the bezel and case, this configuration isn't recommended for diving because the pressures could affect/dislodge or whatever one of those jewels.
So unlike many other bejeweled Rolex watches that aren't dive specific or even water watches and dont have depth rating in oem configuration, this one joins the club. However, it is still constructed and engineered to be a 300m waterproof watch. You just can't go use it for diving or weld oil lines underwater then go whining to Rolex that you almost drowned because the bezel doesn't have numbers and you lost two sapphires and want them covered under warranty.....you know because that's what we do around here, by a large margin Rolex buyers go diving, racing and scaling 20k meter peaks with our professional sports Rolex watches. Dont listen to that intsy tinsy tiny minority that is even afraid to shower with a Rolex or take it to Mexico, that's only like two or three vocal people on social media. |
28 April 2021, 03:45 PM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,429
|
Quote:
But I don't know. Why I was asking here since there are so many knowledgeable people. |
|
28 April 2021, 04:00 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,759
|
Only Rolex knows and they never explain anything.
Perhaps just aesthetics, looks good imho
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
28 April 2021, 04:18 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: nyc
Posts: 734
|
I mean Occam's Razor would state that no one would ever go deep sea diving with a six figure piece of sapphire-encrusted luxury jewelry. Probably why.
|
28 April 2021, 04:37 PM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: MD/NC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,591
|
Quote:
|
|
28 April 2021, 04:43 PM | #13 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
Quote:
It’s an exercise in futility trying to rationalize this watch or any Rolex as a tool. The Rainbow Daytona doesn’t have a tachymeter scale, nor do a few others, and neither don’t a couple GMTs have a 24hr bezel. This is jewelry, period. Look at some RM chronos, can’t even read any numbers, don’t even have a scale for timing. Watches like these are jewelry statement pieces, and some ultra rich folks don’t even set the time. Grab it, wear it, flex....collect props, mission complete. |
|
28 April 2021, 04:54 PM | #14 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub41 OP36 & DJ36
Posts: 2,026
|
I'd be more interested to understand why anyone would want to pay 150k for a watch that looks like a Christmas tree decoration?
|
28 April 2021, 05:15 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,062
|
Have to agree they make them because they can and great skill in setting the stones but not my cup of tea at any price.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
28 April 2021, 05:22 PM | #16 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub41 OP36 & DJ36
Posts: 2,026
|
|
28 April 2021, 06:45 PM | #17 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,693
|
I'm guessing it's a matter of aesthetics alone. But truly, this watch is less likely to see 10 feet of water that any other Sub variant. This is meant for diners not divers.
|
29 April 2021, 01:01 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: US
Watch: sub
Posts: 2,429
|
So maybe it goes to intended use. But that still doesn't answer if it is capable or if it is compromised in some way.
|
29 April 2021, 01:56 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Milky way
Watch: u wearin'?
Posts: 219
|
Well, if a 150k watch isn't all that much to an individual, he/she will dive and do whatever with it, I think we can expect that they would be able to handle/afford whatever consequence which may come out of it pretty easily.
__________________
Wait to buy, buy to wait. |
29 April 2021, 02:24 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2021
Real Name: Will
Location: PacNW, USA
Watch: 16610/126610LV
Posts: 360
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.