The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 May 2021, 02:59 AM   #1
WalterE
"TRF" Member
 
WalterE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Europe
Watch: Too many says wife
Posts: 346
Why isn't the GMT hand in the Explorer 2 behind the hour hand?

I have been reading a lot about the new Explorer II 226570, thanks to this model's increase popularity and attention recently.

There is a design decision, however, that baffles me: Since maximising legibility is THE key design premise for this model, why assemble the GMT "freccione" on top of the regular hour hand?

Since the stem of the freccione is rather wide (compared to the regular GMT hand on the GMT-Master2) and not luminescent, it can easily obscure the regular hour hand, I suppose. Wouldn't it make more sense to assemble it at the bottom of the train, so that the shorter hour hand is always visible on top of the GMT hand? The tip of the orange freccione would always be visible underneath, since it is longer, right?

I realise caliber 3285 on the GMT-Master has the same arrangement of the watch hands, however this is less of an issue on that model due to the different design of the GMT hand.

There must be a reason that escapes me... I turn to you, oh wise WIS, for enlightenment!

Thanks in advance!
WalterE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 03:10 AM   #2
BobtheViking
"TRF" Member
 
BobtheViking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Up North, UK
Posts: 108
Really, if you are using the 'gmt' hand for its intended use, you would use it over the standard hour hand. It wasn't meant to indicate a different time zone but to distinguish am from pm.

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
BobtheViking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 03:25 AM   #3
SN13
"TRF" Member
 
SN13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by WalterE View Post
There is a design decision, however, that baffles me: Since maximising legibility is THE key design premise for this model, why assemble the GMT "freccione" on top of the regular hour hand?
In order to minimize the thickness of the watch, the Hour hand is shorter than the markers on the dial so it can be close to the face.

The GMT hand is second so it can be above the Hour markers.

The Minute and Seconds above that.

If the GMT were below, the entire stack would have to start ABOVE the hour markers or be short of the hour markers.

In essence it saves about 1mm of overall thickness to do it the way Rolex does vs the ETA 2893 movements with their GMT/H/M/S stack.

Actually the OLD 1675 Rolex used the GMT/H/M/S stack...




But that was with Printed dials and no Applied Markers....

You can see the stack change with the 16750 series





The design baffles you because you have never assembled or designed a watch.....
__________________
IG@Construction_Time

--- 1986 DD 18038 --- 1992 YM 16628 --- 2015 116600 SD4K --- SBDX001 MM300 --- 2009 Omega Ploprof White --- 2010 Omega LE LMPO
SN13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 03:35 AM   #4
GradyPhilpott
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
GradyPhilpott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK047
Posts: 34,460
Quote:
Originally Posted by SN13 View Post
In order to minimize the thickness of the watch, the Hour hand is shorter than the markers on the dial so it can be close to the face.

The GMT hand is second so it can be above the Hour markers.

The Minute and Seconds above that.

If the GMT were below, the entire stack would have to start ABOVE the hour markers or be short of the hour markers.

In essence it saves about 1mm of overall thickness to do it the way Rolex does vs the ETA 2893 movements with their GMT/H/M/S stack.

Actually the OLD 1675 Rolex used the GMT/H/M/S stack...

But that was with Printed dials and no Applied Markers....

You can see the stack change with the 16750 series

The design baffles you because you have never assembled or designed a watch.....
Good answer!
__________________
JJ

Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner
GradyPhilpott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 08:08 PM   #5
WalterE
"TRF" Member
 
WalterE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Europe
Watch: Too many says wife
Posts: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by SN13 View Post
In order to minimize the thickness of the watch, the Hour hand is shorter than the markers on the dial so it can be close to the face.

The GMT hand is second so it can be above the Hour markers.

The Minute and Seconds above that.

If the GMT were below, the entire stack would have to start ABOVE the hour markers or be short of the hour markers.

In essence it saves about 1mm of overall thickness to do it the way Rolex does vs the ETA 2893 movements with their GMT/H/M/S stack.
Thanks, SN13, for explaining. That makes perfect sense! I had not considered the height of the applied indices with such a long GMT hand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SN13 View Post
The design baffles you because you have never assembled or designed a watch.....
Ouch! Indeed, my field of expertise is somewhere completely different. It's always a pleasure to learn more about the technical aspects of horology from the many knowledgeable TRF members.

Next time, I'll stick to enquiring about appreciation potential, value retention, advantageous trades, and the likes...
WalterE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 08:58 PM   #6
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,694
To drive OCDs crazy of course!!!
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 09:00 PM   #7
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,106
I love threads like these as it brings to light something I never would’ve noticed and folks chime in with plausible answers
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 09:41 PM   #8
garyk
2024 Pledge Member
 
garyk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Gary
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 11,749
Hmmmm, interesting
__________________
garyk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 09:47 PM   #9
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
I love threads like these as it brings to light something I never would’ve noticed and folks chime in with plausible answers
I was just thinking the same thing. I know someone with direct knowledge will give the exact reason and I will learn something new.

The thread a few years back about the counterweight on the seconds hand perfectly covering the "o" in Rolex still blows my mind to this day.
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 09:56 PM   #10
brandrea
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
brandrea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 78,106
Quote:
Originally Posted by samson66 View Post
I was just thinking the same thing. I know someone with direct knowledge will give the exact reason and I will learn something new.

The thread a few years back about the counterweight on the seconds hand perfectly covering the "o" in Rolex still blows my mind to this day.
Thanks for the reminder Mike, another great thread indeed.

There are so many subtle nuances to be learned here.
brandrea is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 10:02 PM   #11
CalSRQ1
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
CalSRQ1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Chris
Location: Florida USA
Watch: 5513
Posts: 719
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobtheviking View Post
It wasn't meant to indicate a different time zone but to distinguish am from pm. k
Huh?
CalSRQ1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 10:12 PM   #12
BobtheViking
"TRF" Member
 
BobtheViking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Up North, UK
Posts: 108
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalSRQ1 View Post
Huh?
Shamelessly stolen from an article

Introduced as a watch for spelunkers, the Explorer II design is function over form. The darkness in some of these caves makes it impossible to tell whether it is day or night, which is the reason for the 24-hour hand and fixed bezel. While the original Explorer II Ref. 1655 was not at all meant to be a travel watch, the 16570 introduced an independent hour hand that functionally made the watch a dual time zone travel watch.

The original version has a fixed 24 hour bezel (retained) but it also fixed the 'GMT' hand to track the hour hand. So if the hour hand was at 6 and it was PM, the 'GMT' hand would sit at 18.

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
BobtheViking is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 10:15 PM   #13
SN13
"TRF" Member
 
SN13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by WalterE View Post

Ouch! Indeed, my field of expertise is somewhere completely different. It's always a pleasure to learn more about the technical aspects of horology from the many knowledgeable TRF members.
Maybe a little blunt from my end.
__________________
IG@Construction_Time

--- 1986 DD 18038 --- 1992 YM 16628 --- 2015 116600 SD4K --- SBDX001 MM300 --- 2009 Omega Ploprof White --- 2010 Omega LE LMPO
SN13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 10:34 PM   #14
Speedbird-1
"TRF" Member
 
Speedbird-1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Steve.
Location: UK
Posts: 6,473
Quote:
Originally Posted by samson66 View Post

The thread a few years back about the counterweight on the seconds hand perfectly covering the "o" in Rolex still blows my mind to this day.

Haha..you got me.
I'd forgotten about this.
I looked down and had to wait almost 57 seconds to check it out!
I think I'm suffering with tertiary OcD.
Just off to check it again (28 second wait!)
Speedbird-1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 11:02 PM   #15
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedbird-1 View Post
Haha..you got me.
I'd forgotten about this.
I looked down and had to wait almost 57 seconds to check it out!
I think I'm suffering with tertiary OcD.
Just off to check it again (28 second wait!)
I know right! It's one of those moments!

samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 11:16 PM   #16
fishingbear
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
fishingbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: George
Location: Alabama
Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt
Posts: 4,549
I love these type TRF threads. Mechanical watches and their constructed design are what brought me to the hobby over 25 years ago.
fishingbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2021, 11:59 PM   #17
WalterE
"TRF" Member
 
WalterE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Europe
Watch: Too many says wife
Posts: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by SN13 View Post
Maybe a little blunt from my end.
All in good spirit!

Thanks again for the explanation. Truly appreciated, as I am always keen to learn more about the history and technicalities of mechanical watches in general, and Rolex in particular.

I personally enjoy this kind of threads much more than those around what is the correct price to pay for such watches or their future value.
WalterE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2021, 12:05 AM   #18
KBM
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
KBM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: K.
Location: 780
Posts: 10,460
Very interesting. Learned something new today.
KBM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2021, 01:47 AM   #19
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by SN13 View Post
In order to minimize the thickness of the watch, the Hour hand is shorter than the markers on the dial so it can be close to the face.

The GMT hand is second so it can be above the Hour markers.

The Minute and Seconds above that.

If the GMT were below, the entire stack would have to start ABOVE the hour markers or be short of the hour markers.

In essence it saves about 1mm of overall thickness to do it the way Rolex does vs the ETA 2893 movements with their GMT/H/M/S stack.

Actually the OLD 1675 Rolex used the GMT/H/M/S stack...


But that was with Printed dials and no Applied Markers....

You can see the stack change with the 16750 series


The design baffles you because you have never assembled or designed a watch.....
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2021, 12:44 AM   #20
A.I.
"TRF" Member
 
A.I.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Glasgow UK
Watch: 126610LV
Posts: 759
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobtheViking View Post
Shamelessly stolen from an article

Introduced as a watch for spelunkers, the Explorer II design is function over form. The darkness in some of these caves makes it impossible to tell whether it is day or night, which is the reason for the 24-hour hand and fixed bezel. While the original Explorer II Ref. 1655 was not at all meant to be a travel watch, the 16570 introduced an independent hour hand that functionally made the watch a dual time zone travel watch.

The original version has a fixed 24 hour bezel (retained) but it also fixed the 'GMT' hand to track the hour hand. So if the hour hand was at 6 and it was PM, the 'GMT' hand would sit at 18.

Sent from my Pixel 5 using Tapatalk
Now I know why I have one - I'm off to spelunk.

Thanks.
A.I. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2021, 01:10 AM   #21
SN13
"TRF" Member
 
SN13's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,124
Quote:
Originally Posted by samson66 View Post
I spent quite a lot of time staring at my 16570...

Here's a Good photo of my old one illustrating the stacking.




Here's a photo of how Monta dealt with the stacking on a standard ETA 2893 movement to avoid adding dial to crystal depth...

__________________
IG@Construction_Time

--- 1986 DD 18038 --- 1992 YM 16628 --- 2015 116600 SD4K --- SBDX001 MM300 --- 2009 Omega Ploprof White --- 2010 Omega LE LMPO
SN13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2021, 02:42 AM   #22
imsayingthough
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: New York
Posts: 761
Glad to learn.
imsayingthough is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2021, 03:07 AM   #23
samson66
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
samson66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by SN13 View Post
I spent quite a lot of time staring at my 16570...

Here's a Good photo of my old one illustrating the stacking.
Great information. I find this stuff fascinating (honestly).

Looks like my Tudor GMT is set up the same way with the hour hand at the bottom of the stack. No I understand why
samson66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2021, 04:53 AM   #24
CashGap
"TRF" Member
 
CashGap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Blank
Location: Romo
Posts: 1,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by WalterE View Post
I personally enjoy this kind of threads much more than those around what is the correct price to pay for such watches or their future value.
“Is it safe to wear my Rolex while I trim my nails”

“I got a few drops of olive oil on my Rolex, should I send it to the RSC for pressure test”

“Should I try for a 116595RBOW Rainbow Daytona for list price or a two-tone ladies Datejust at a discount? Which is likely to ______/go up the most as a percentage of value/cause my AD to want to offer me a a Sub Date fastest/look best with my new custom home made clothing line I’m launching next fall?”

Funnier is that those questions would draw passionate responses on both sides!
CashGap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2021, 05:32 AM   #25
SydR
"TRF" Member
 
SydR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 338
Why isn't the GMT hand in the Explorer 2 behind the hour hand?

I never even noticed what way the hands were stacked until this thread.

Interesting to hear the reason given; makes perfect sense.
SydR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2021, 05:49 AM   #26
214270Explorer
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: United States
Watch: me buy Watches
Posts: 3,955
Thanks for the interesting topic !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
The display of actual intelligence terrifies much of mankind

Rolex "some"
Tudor "some"
Damasko "some"
Misc Pieces "some"
Marathon "some"
GS Spring Drive "some"
Hamilton "some"
Findeisen "some"
214270Explorer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2021, 06:46 AM   #27
WalterE
"TRF" Member
 
WalterE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Europe
Watch: Too many says wife
Posts: 346
Quote:
Originally Posted by CashGap View Post
Funnier is that those questions would draw passionate responses on both sides!
WalterE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 May 2021, 08:33 AM   #28
carnage9191
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: NYC
Watch: Skydweller
Posts: 42
I noticed the same thing on the Tudor GMT glad I’m not the only crazy one who picked up on this!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
carnage9191 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

My Watch LLC

WatchesOff5th

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.